Accuracy of scanography using storage phosphor plate systems and film for assessment of mandibular third molars

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 306-309

  Matzen, L H ^a   Christensen, J ^a   Wenzel, A ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Dental radiology; Scanography; Third molar

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR, THIRD; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959813960     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/68783877     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Radiation Protection. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. European Committee Issue No. 136, 2004.
2. Flygare L, Öhman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Invest 2008;12:291-302.
3. Benediktsdottir IS, Hintze H, Petersen JK, Wenzel A. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:39-44. (Pubitemid 40287984)
4. Benediktsdottir IS, Hintze H, Petersen JK, Wenzel A. Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:109-115.
5. Wiese M, Hintze H, Svensson P, Wenzel A. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:12-17. (Pubitemid 46499492)
6. Tammisalo T, Happonen R-P, Tammisalo EH. Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in the relation to the roots of impacted lower third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:85-89.
7. Wenzel A, Aagaard E, Sindet-Petersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: diagnostic accuracy for mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:255-263. (Pubitemid 128685563)
8. Wenzel A, Aagaard E, Sindet-Petersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: outcome following removal of mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:264-269. (Pubitemid 128685564)
9. Wenzel A. Dental students' ability for three-dimensional perception of two-dimensional images using natural stereopsis: its impact on radiographic localization. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:98-104.
10. Gotfredsen E, Kragskov J, Wenzel A. Development of a system for craniofacial analyses from monitor-displayed digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:123-126.
11. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:276-284.
12. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Tamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:253-259.