Online asynchronous collaboration in mathematics teacher education and the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching

Teacher Educator

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 54-73

  Silverman, Jason ^a   Clay, Ellen L ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959762554     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730903386831     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ball, D., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.
2. Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 157-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
4. Blanton, M. L. (2002). Using an undergraduate geometry course to challenge pre-service teachers' notions of discourse. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Edu-cation, 5, 117-152.
5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
6. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
7. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In R. A. Lesh & E. Kelly (Eds.), New methodologies in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflexive discourse and collective reflection. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258-277.
10. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood.
11. Even, R., Robinson, N., & Carmeli, M. (2003). The work of providers of professional development for teachers of mathematics: Two case studies of experienced practitioners. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 227-249.
12. Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2008). No common denominator: The preparation of ele-mentary teachers in mathematics. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
13. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-469.
14. Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 247-271.
15. Lortie, D. (1975). The schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Lotman, Y. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32-51.
17. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understand-ing of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
20. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor-A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Develop-ment, 52(4), 53-65.
22. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning on line. London: Kogan Page.
23. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
24. Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
25. Simon, M. (2000). Research on the development of mathematics teachers: The teacher development experiment. In R. A. Lesh & E. Kelly (Eds.), New methodologies in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
26. Sowder, J., Sowder, L., & Nickerson, S. (2008a). Reconceptualizing mathematics. New York: W. H. Freeman.
27. Sowder, J., Sowder, L., & Nickerson, S. (2008b). Reconceptualizing mathematics (Instructor's guide). New York: W. H. Freeman.
28. Stein, M. K., Smith, M., & Silver, E. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237-269.
29. Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. A. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In D. Aichele & A. Coxford (Eds.), 1994 yearbook of the NCTM: Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 79-92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
30. Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, Part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 2-24.
31. Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviety psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
32. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Original work published in 1934)
33. Wertsch, J., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Zeichner, K. (1996). Designing educative practicum experiences for prospective teachers. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 215-233). New York: Teachers College Press.