Review of PSR framework and development of a DPSIR model to assess greenhouse effect in Taiwan

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 177, Issue 1-4, 2011, Pages 623-635

  Huang, Hui Fen ^a   Kuo, Jeff ^b   Lo, Shang Lien ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cause effect chain; Driving Force Pressure State Impact Response; Greenhouse effect; Indicator

Indexed keywords

CAUSE-EFFECT; CAUSE-EFFECT CHAIN; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; DRIVING FORCE-PRESSURE- STATE-IMPACT-RESPONSE; DYNAMIC CORRELATION; DYNAMIC INTERACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; GHG EMISSION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LITERATURE REVIEWS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SUPPLY AND DEMAND; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE MODELS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; GREENHOUSES; POLLUTION CONTROL; RATING;

GREENHOUSE EFFECT;

CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; POLLUTION CONTROL; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POLICY; POLLUTION CONTROL; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TAIWAN;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MODELS, CHEMICAL; TAIWAN;

TAIWAN;

EID: 79959739492     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1661-7     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Aldy, J. E. (2006). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions convergence or divergence? Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 33(4), 533-555, 04.
2. Aldy, J. E. (2007). Divergence in state-level per capita carbon dioxide emissions Land Economics (Vol. 83 , pp. 353-369). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bereau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), ROC (2007). The energy situation in Taiwan. http://web2.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/About/ energy%20situation/main/en-01.html.
4. Bruun, H., Hukkinen, J., & Eklund, E. (2002). Scenarios for coping with contingency: The case of aquaculture in the Finnish Archipelago Sea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 107-127. (Pubitemid 34497480)
5. Council for Economic Planning andDevelopment (CEPD) (2003). Taiwan statistical data book. Taiwan: CEPD.
6. den Elzen, M., Berk, M., Schaeffer, M., Olivier, J., Hendriks, C., & Metz, B. (1999). The Brazilian proposal and other options for international burden sharing: An evaluation of methodological and policy aspects using the fair model. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment.
7. Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., et al. (2005). The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI): Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
8. EU-funded ODYSSEE project (2004). http://www.odyssee-indicators.org/.
9. European Environment Agency (EEA) (1999). Environmental indicators: Typology and overview. Technical report no 25. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
10. 2 Mitigation. Laxenberg: IASSA.
11. Golub, A., Markandya, A., & Marcellino, D. (2006). Does the Kyoto protocol cost too much and create unbreakable barriers for economic growth? Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(4), 520-535.
12. Harmeling, S. (2008). Global climate risk index (CRI) 2008. Weather-related loss events and their impacts on countries in 2006 and in a longterm comparison. http://www.germanwatch.org/klima/cri2008.pdf.
13. IEA (2004). Oil crises and climate challenges: 30 years of energy use in IEA countries. Paris, France: International Energy Agency. http://www.iiasa.ac. at/Research/ECS/IEW2004/docs/2004A-Unander.pdf.
14. IEA (2005). 30 key energy trends in the IEA & Worldwide. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2005/energy-trends.pdf.
15. IPCC (1995). Economic and social dimensions of climate change. In J. P. Bruce, H. Lee, & E. F. Haites (Eds.), Contribution of working group III to the second assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. IPCC (2001a). Climate change 2001: Mitigation. In B. Metz & O. Davidson (Eds.), Contribution of working group III to the third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. IPCC (2001b). Climate change 2001: WG III: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc-tar/ wg3/index.htm.
18. IPCC (2005). Report of the joint IPCC WG II & III expert meeting on the integration of adaptation, mitigation and sustainable develoment into the 4th IPCC assessment report, Reunion Island, 16-18 February 2005
19. IPCC (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Working group II report: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. Parry, O. Canziani, J. Palutik, P. van der Linden, & C. Hanson (Eds.) http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg2. htm.
20. Jorgenson, D., & Wilcoxen, P. (1995). Reducing U.S. carbon emissions: An econometric general equilibrium assessment. CA: Standard University Press.
21. Kavuncu, Y. O., & Knabb, S. D. (2005). Stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions: assessing the intergenerational cost and benefits of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Economics, 27(3), 369-386. (Pubitemid 40678511)
22. La Rovere, E., Valente de Macedo, L., & Baumert, K. (2002). The Brazilian proposal on relative responsibility for global warming building on the Kyoto protocol: Options for protecting the climate. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
23. MacGill, I., Outhred, H., & Nolles, K. (2006). Some design lessons from market-based greenhouse gas regulation in the restructured Australian electricity industry. Energy Policy, 34, 11-25. (Pubitemid 40829495)
24. Metzger, M. J., Leemans, R., & Schröter, D. (2004). A multidisciplinary multi-scale framework for assessing vulnerability to global change. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment conference: Bridging Scales and Epistemologies - 17-20 March 2004, Alexandria, Egypt. Session 6.2: Multi-Scale Assessments: Advances, Insights, and Remaining Challenges. http://www. millenniumassessment.org/documents/bridging/papers/metzger.marc.pdf.
25. 2 emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 495-508.
26. Nordhaus, W. D. (1992). An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science, 258, 1315-1319.
27. Nordhaus, W. D. (2006). Life after Kyoto: Alternative mechanisms to control global warming polices. Prepared for the Annual Meetings of the American Economic Association, Boston, Massachusetts, 5-8 January 2006. Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/kyoto-long-2005.pdf.
28. Nordhaus, W. D. (2008). A question of balance - weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/homepage/Balance-2nd-proofs.pdf.
29. Nordhaus, W. D., & Boyer, J. (2000). Warming the world: Economic models of global warming. Cambridge: MIT.
30. OECD (1993). OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. OECD Environment Monographs No. 83. Paris: OECD.
31. OECD (2002). Overview of Sustainable Development Indicators used by National and International Agencies. OECD, STD/DOC (2002)2 OECD Statistics Working Paper 2003.
32. OECD (2007). Key environmental indicators. OECD Environment Directorat. Paris: OECD.
33. Ridgley, M. A. (1996). Fair sharing of greenhouse gas burdens. Energy Policy, 24(6), 517-529.
34. Running, S.W., & Nemani, R. R. (1988). Relating seasonal patterns of the AVHRR vegetation index to simulated photosynthesis and transpiration of forests in different climates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24, 347-367. (Pubitemid 19319672)
35. Schröter, D., Acosta-Michlik, L., Reidsma, P., Metzger, M. J. & Klein, R. J. T. (2003). Modelling the vulnerability of eco-social systems to global change: Human adaptive capacity to changes in ecosystem service provision. Paper presented at the Fifth Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, Montreal, Canada. Available online http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/openmtg/.
36. Siddiqi, T. A. (2002). Natural gas reserves/total energy consumption: A useful new ratio for addressing global climate change concerns. Energy Policy, 30, 1145-1149.
37. 2 damage costs in energy scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy, 9, 217-227.
38. Stern, N. (2006). Stern review on economics of climate change. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent-reviews/stern-review-economics- climate-change-stern-eport.htm.
39. 2 emission levels converging among industrial countries? Environmental and Resource Economics, 24, 263-271.
40. The Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI) (2008). Identifying the vulnerability of communities to changes in water resources. http://ocwr.ouce.ox. ac.uk/research/wmpg/cvi/cvi-leaflet.pdf.
41. Tsai, W.-T., & Hsien, K.-J. (2007). An analysis of cogeneration system utilized as sustainable energy in the industrial sector in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 2104-2120. (Pubitemid 46962324)
42. UNFCCC (2008). The United Nations climate change conference in Poznań, 1-12 December 2008. http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop-14/items/4481. php.
43. USEPA (1998). Guideline for reporting of daily air quality - Pollutant Standards Index (PSI). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/rprtguid.pdf.
44. World Resources Institute (WRI) (2005). Carbon emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the climate analysis indicators tool (CAIT). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. http://cait.wri.org.
45. Yeh, J. R., Lo, S. L., Lee, L. L., Liu, J. T., Wang, C. S., & Huang, S. L. (2001). Sustainable development indicators for Taiwan. Proc. of workshop on sustainable development indicators. Taiwan: Chuang-Li.
46. Yohe, G. (2004). Some thoughts on perspective. Global Environmental Change, 14, 283-286.
47. Yohe, G., Richadr, S., & Tol, J. (2002). Indicators for social and economic coping capacity-moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 12, 25-40. (Pubitemid 34443740)