Does the Kyoto protocol cost too much and create unbreakable barriers for economic growth?

Contemporary Economic Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 520-535

  Golub, Alexander ^a   Markandya, Anil ^b,c   Marcellino, Dominic ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^c FONDAZIONE ENI ENRICO MATTEI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749634619     PISSN: 10743529     EISSN: 14657287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cep/byl012     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Aulisi, A., D. J. Dudek, J. Goffman, M. Oppenheimer, A. Petsonk, and S. Wade. From Obstacle to Opportunity: How Acid Rain Emissions Trading Is Delivering Cleaner Air. New York: Environmental Defense, 2000.
2. Carraro, C., R. Gerlagh, and B. C. C. van der Zwaan. "Endogenous Technical Change in Environmental Macroeconomics." Resource and Energy Economics, 25, 2003, 1-10.
3. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
4. Energy Information Administration. 2004. http://www. eia.doe.gov/.
5. Gerlagh, R. "A Climate-Change Policy Induced Shift from Innovations in Energy Production to Energy Savings." Working Papers no. 2004.128, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 2004.
6. Gerlagh, R., and B. C. C. van der Zwaan. "Long-Term Substitutability between Environmental and Man-Made Goods." Journal of Environmental and Economic Management, 44, 2002, 329-45.
7. 2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change." Working Paper no. W6494, NBER, 1998.
8. 2 Abatement Policies." Resource and Energy Economics, 21, 1999, 211-53.
9. Grossman, G., and A. B. Krueger. "Economic Growth and the Environment." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1995, 353-77.
10. Interlaboratory Working Group. Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2000.
11. International Congress. "Economic Modelling of Environmental Policy and Endogenous Technological Change." Contributors B. C. C. van der Zwaan, R. Gerlagh, C. Carraro, and G. Klaassen. Trippenhuis, Amsterdam, 16-17 November 2000.
12. IPCC. Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
13. Krause, F., S. J. DeCanio, J. A. Hoerner, and P. Baer. "Cutting Carbon Emissions at a Profit (Part I): Opportunities for the United States." Contemporary Economic Policy, 20, 2002, 339-65.
14. Maddison, A. The World Economy: Historical Statistics. OECD Development Centre, Paris, 2004.
15. Markandya, A. "Policy Failures as a Cause of Environmental Degradation," in The Handbook of Environmental Economics, edited by Karl-Goran Maler and Jeffery Vincent. General editors: Kenneth Arrow and Michael Intriligator. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 2005.
16. 2 Emissions in Selected European Countries." Nota Di Lavoro 1.2004, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy, 2004. http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/Wpapers/default.htm.
17. Mastrandrea, M., and S. Schneider. "Probabilistic Integrated Assessment of 'Dangerous' Climate Change." Science, 304, 2004, 571-5.
18. Nakicenovic, N. "Technological Change and Diffusion as a Learning Process," in Technological Change and the Environment, edited by A. Grubler, N. Nakicenovic, and W. D. Nordhaus. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2002.
19. Nordhaus, W. D. "Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy," in Technological Change and the Environment, edited by A. Grubler, N. Nakicenovic, and W. D. Nordhaus. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2002.
20. Paltsev, S., J. Reilly, H. Jacoby, A. D. Ellerman, and K. H. Tay. "Emissions Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States: The McCain-Lieberman Proposal." MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Climate Change Report No. 97, 2003.
21. Rock, M. T. "Pollution Intensity of GDP and Trade Policy: Can the World Bank Be Wrong?" World Development, 24, 1996, 471-9.
22. RIVM, EFTEC, NTUA. "European Environmental Priorities: An Environmental and Economic Assessment." Report to DGXI of the European Commission, 2000.
23. Selden, T. M., and D. Song. "Environmental Quality and Development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution?" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 1994, 147-62.
24. Shafik, N., and S. Bandyopadhyay. "Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence." Papers 904, World Bank, Country Economics Department, 1992.
25. Smulders, S. "Endogenous Growth Theory and the Environment," in Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by J. C. J. M. van den Bergh. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1999, 610-21, chap. 42.
26. Stern, D. 2004. Website providing data for research. http://www.rpi.edu/ ~sternd/datasite.html.
27. Tol, R. "The Marginal Damage Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment of the Uncertainties." Energy Policy, 33, 2005, 2064-74.
28. UNFCCC. Kyoto Protocol, 1997. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/ kpeng.pdf.
29. van Vuuren, D., J. Cofala, H. Eerens, R. Oostenrijk, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, M. den Elzen, and M. Amann. "Exploring the Ancillary Benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for Air Pollution in Europe." Energy Policy, 34, 2006, 444-60.