Estimated within-herd prevalence (WHP) of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in a sample of Minnesota dairy herds using bacterial culture of pooled fecal samples

Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 112-116

  Raizman, Eran A ^a,d   Wells, Scott J ^a   Muñoz Zanzi, Claudia A ^b   Tavornpanich, Saraya ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c NORWEGIAN VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; DAIRY CATTLE; FECES; FEMALE; HERD; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; DAIRYING; FECES; FEMALE; MINNESOTA; MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 79959738785     PISSN: 08309000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Johnson-Ifearulundu YJ, Kaneene JB, Sprecher DJ, Gardiner JC, Lloyd JW. The effect of subclinical Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection on days open in Michigan, USA, dairy cows. Prev Vet Med 2000;46:171-181.
2. Hirst HL, Garry FB, Morley PS, et al. Seroprevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection among dairy cows in Colorado and herd-level risk factors for seropositivity. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:97-101.
3. Muskens J, Barkema HW, Russchen E, van Maanen K, Schukken YH, Bakker D. Prevalence and regional distribution of paratuberculosis in dairy herds in The Netherlands. Vet Microbiol 2000;77:253-261.
4. Groenendaal H, Nielen, M, Jalvingh AW, Horst SH, Galligan DT, Hesselink JW. A simulation of Johne's disease control. Prev Vet Med 2002;54:225-245.
5. Kalis CHJ, Hesselink JW, Barkema HW, Collins MT. Culture strategically pooled bovine fecal samples as a method to screen herds for paratuberculosis. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000;12:547-551.
6. Sergeant ES, Whittington RJ, More SJ. Sensitivity and specificity of pooled faecal culture and serology as flock-screening tests for detection of ovine paratuberculosis in Australia. Prev Vet Med 2002;52:199-211.
7. Wells SJ, Whitlock RH, Lindeman CJ, Fyock T. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1207-1211.
8. Whittington RJ, Fell S, Walker D, et al. Use of pooled fecal culture for sensitive and economic detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in flocks of sheep. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2550-2556.
9. van Schaik G, Pradenas FM, Mella NA, Kruze VJ. Diagnostic validity and costs of pooled fecal samples and individual blood or fecal samples to determine the cow- and herd-status for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Prev Vet Med 2007;82:159-165.
10. van Schaik G, Stehman SM, Schukken YH, Rossiter CR, Shin SJ. Pooled fecal culture sampling for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis at different herd sizes and prevalence. J Vet Diagn Invest 2003;15:233-241.
11. Vialard J, Lacheretz A, Thiercy-Richard Y, Prave M. Détection de l'infection paratuberculeuse chez les bovins par une technique de coproculture de groupe. Revue Méd Vét 1993;144:527-533.
12. Raizman EA, Wells SJ, Godden SM, et al. The distribution of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in the environment surrounding Minnesota dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:2959-2966.
13. Whipple DL, Callihan DR, Jarnagin JL. Cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal specimens and a suggested standardized procedure. J Vet Diagn Invest 1991;3: 368-373.
14. Martin SW, Meek AH, Willeberg P. Veterinary Epidemiology, Principles and Methods. 1st ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1987:343 p.
15. Collins MT, Gardner IA, Garry FB, Roussel AJ, Wells SJ. Consensus recommendations on the diagnostic testing for the detection of the paratuberculosis in cattle in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;229:1912-1919.
16. Cowling DW, Gardner IA, Johnson WO. Comparison of methods for estimation of individual level prevalence based on pooled samples. Prev Vet Med 1999;39:211-225.
17. Tavornpanich S, Gardner IA, Anderson RJ, et al. Evaluation of microbial culture of pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in large dairy herds. Am J Vet Res 2004;65:1061-1070.
18. Raizman EA, Wells SJ, Godden SM, Fetrow J, Friendshuh K, Oakes MJ. Characterization of Minnesota dairy herds participating in a Johne's disease control program and evaluation of the program risk assessment tool. Prev Vet Med 2006;75:22-33.
19. Wells SJ, Godden SM, Lindman CJ, Collins JE. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of individual and pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:1022-1025.
20. Whitlock RH, Rosenberger AE. Fecal culture protocol of mycobacterium paratuberculosis. A recommended procedure. Proc Ann Meetin US Anim Hlth Assoc 1990;94:280-285.
21. Whitlock RH, Rosenberger AE, Sweeney RW, Spencer PA. National survey of diagnostic laboratories; the performance of fecal culture and serologic testing for Johne's disease. Proceedings of the Fifth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis 1992:242-249.
22. Sacks JM, Bolin SR, Crowder SV. Prevalence estimation from pooled samples. Am J Vet Res 1989;50:205-206.
23. Gardner IA. The utility of Bayes' theorem and Bayesian inference in veterinary clinical practice and research. Aust Vet J 2002;80:758-761.
24. Toribio JA, Sergeant ES. A comparison of methods to estimate the prevalence of ovine Johne's infection from pooled faecal samples. Aust Vet J 2007;85:317-324.
25. Whitlock RH, Wells SJ, Sweeney RW, Van Tiem J. ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): Sensitivity and specificity of each method. Vet Microbiol 2000;77:387-398.