Usefulness of Computerized Method for Lung Nodule Detection in Digital Chest Radiographs Using Temporal Subtraction Images

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1000-1005

  Aoki, Takatoshi ^a   Oda, Nobuhiro ^b   Yamashita, Yoshiko ^a   Yamamoto, Keiji ^c   Korogi, Yukunori ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

^b KYOTO COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c MITSUBISHI SPACE SOFTWARE CO LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chest radiograph; Computer aided diagnosis; Lung cancer; Lung nodule

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 79959730282     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Austin J.H., Romney B.M., Goldmith L.S. Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1992, 182:115-122.
2. Muhm J.R., Miller W.E., Fontana R.S., et al. Lung cancer detected during a screening program using 4-month chest radiographs. Radiology 1983, 148:609-615.
3. Heelan R.T., Flehinger B.J., Melamed M.R., et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the New York Screening Program. Radiology 1984, 151:289-293.
4. Samei E., Flynn M.J., Eyler W.R. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomical noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 1999, 213:727-734.
5. Uozumi T., Nakamura K., Watanabe H., et al. ROC analysis of detection of metastatic pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs with temporal subtraction. Acad Radiol 2001, 8:871-878.
6. Johkoh T., Kozuka T., Tomiyama N., et al. Temporal subtraction for detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: evaluation of a commercially available computer-aided diagnosis system. Radiology 2002, 223:806-811.
7. Kakeda S., Nakamura K., Kamada K., et al. Improved detection of lung nodules by using a temporal subtraction technique. Radiology 2002, 224:145-151.
8. Oda N., Kido S., Shono H., et al. Development of computerized system for detection of pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs using subtraction images. Jpn J IEICE Trans 2004, 87D:208-218.
9. Kano A., Doi K., MacMahon H., et al. Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. Med Phys 1994, 21:453-461.
10. Ishida T., Katsuragawa S., Nakamura K., et al. Iterative image warping technique for temporal subtraction of sequential chest radiographs to detect interval change. Med Phys 1999, 26:1320-1329.
11. Xu X.W., Doi K. Image feature analysis for computer-aided diagnosis: accurate determination of ribcage boundary in chest radiographs. Med Phys 1995, 22:617-626.
12. Katsuragawa S., Doi K., MacMahon H. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: detection and characterization of interstitial lung disease in digital chest radiographs. Med Phys 1988, 15:311-319.
13. Xu X.W., Doi K., Kobayashi T., et al. Development of an improved CAD scheme for automated detection of lung nodules in digital chest images. Med Phys 1997, 24:1395-1403.
14. Duda R.O., Hart R.E., Stork D.G. Pattern Classification 2001, John Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
15. Jain A.K., Duin P.W., Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition; a review. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2000, 22:17-24.
16. Shiraishi J., Katsuragawa S., Ikezoe J., et al. Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 174:71-74.
17. Kobayashi T., Xu X.W., MacMahon H., et al. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 1996, 199:843-848.
18. Metz C.E., Herman B.A., Shen J.H. Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998, 17:1033-1053.
19. Dorfman D.D., Berbaum K.S., Metz C.E. ROC rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992, 27:723-731.
20. Freedman M.T., Osicka T., Lo S.C.B., et al. Methods for identifying changes in radiologists' behavioral operating point of sensitivity-specificity tradeoffs within an ROC study of the use of computeraided detection of lung cancer. Prop SPIE 2001, 4324:184-194.
21. Henschke C.I., Naidich D.P., Yankelevitz D.F., et al. Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings. Cancer 2001, 92:153-159.
22. Patz E.F., Black W.C., Goodman P.C. CT screening for lung cancer: not ready for routine practice. Radiology 2001, 221:587-591.