Tetraploidization events by chromosome doubling of nucellar cells are frequent in apomictic citrus and are dependent on genotype and environment

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-50

  Aleza, Pablo ^a   Froelicher, Yann ^b   Schwarz, Sergio ^a   Agustí, Manuel ^c   Hernández, María ^a   Juárez, José ^a   Luro, François ^d   Morillon, Raphael ^b   Navarro, Luis ^a   Ollitrault, Patrick ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRARIAS IVIA   (Spain)

^b CIRAD   (France)

^c UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^d Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

apomixis; chromosome doubling; Citrus; flow cytometry; polyembryony; SSR markers; tetraploid

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL VARIATION; APOMIXIS; CHROMOSOME; CULTIVAR; CYTOLOGY; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; POLYPLOIDY; ROOTSTOCK; SEEDLING;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CITRUS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIPLOIDY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT SEED; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SEEDLING; TETRAPLOIDY;

ALLELES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BREEDING; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CITRUS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIPLOIDY; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SEEDLING; SEEDS; TETRAPLOIDY;

CITRONCIRUS WEBBERI; CITRUS; CITRUS SINENSIS; CITRUS SINENSIS X PONCIRUS TRIFOLIATA; PONCIRUS TRIFOLIATA;

EID: 79959704050     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr099     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Adams KL, Wendel J. 2005. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135-141. (Pubitemid 40323541)
2. Adams KL, Percifield R,Wendel JF. 2004. Organ-specific silencing of duplicated genes in a newly synthesized cotton allotetraploid. Genetics 168: 2217-2226. (Pubitemid 40066356)
3. Allario T, Brumos J, Colmenero JM, et al. 2009. Autotetraploid Citrus limonia rootstocks are more tolerant to water deficit than parental diploids. In: International Conference on Polyploidy, Hybridization and Biodiversity, May 17-20, 2009, Saint-Malo, France, program and abstracts. Rennes: Université de Rennes 1, p. 98.
4. Albertin W, Brabant P, Catrice O, et al. 2005. Autopolyploidy in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) does not alter significantly the proteomes of green tissues. Proteomics 5: 2131-2139. (Pubitemid 40770577)
5. Aleza P, Juárez J, Ollitrault P, Navarro L. 2009. Production of tetraploid plants of non apomictic citrus genotypes. Plant Cell Reports 28: 1837-1846.
6. Aleza P, Juárez J, Cuenca J, Ollitrault P, Navarro L. 2010a. Recovery of citrus triploid hybrids by embryo rescue and flow cytometry from 2x x 2x sexual hybridisation and its application to extensive breeding programs. Plant Cell Reports 29: 1023-1034.
7. Aleza P, Juárez J, Ollitrault P, Navarro L. 2010b. Polyembryony in nonapomictic citrus genotypes. Annals of Botany 106: 533-545.
8. Asker S, Jerling L. 1992. Apomixis in plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
9. Baack EJ. 2005. Ecological factors influencing tetraploid establishment in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus, Ranunculaceae): minority cytotype exclusion and barriers to triploid formation. American Journal of Botany 92: 1827-1835.
10. Bacchi O. 1943. Cytological observations in citrus III. Megaesporogenesis, fertilization and polyembryony. Botanical Gazzete 105: 221-225.
11. Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT. 2006. Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:1519-1531.
12. Barrett HC, Hutchison DJ. 1978. Spontaneous tetraploidy in apomictic seedlings of Citrus. Economic Botany. 32: 27-45.
13. Benbouzas H, Jacquemin JM, Baudoin JP, Mergeai G. 2006. Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSr markers in polyacrylamide gels. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment 10: 77-81.
14. Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD. 1995. Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytologist 129: 1-22.
15. Cameron JW, Frost HB. 1968. Genetic, breeding and nucellar embryony. In: Reuther W, Batchelor LD, Webber HJ, eds. The citrus industry, vol. 1. Riverside, CA: University of California, 325-370.
16. Cameron JW, Soost RK. 1969. Characters of new populations of Citrus polyploids, and the relation between tetraploidy in the pollen parent and hybrid tetraploid progeny. In: Chapman HD, ed. Proceedings of the International Citric Symposium, Vol. 1, University of California at Riverside, 199-205.
17. Chen ZJ. 2007. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58: 377-406. (Pubitemid 46986330)
18. Comai L, Tyagi AP, Winter K, et al. 2000. Phenotypic instability and rapid gene silencing in newly formed Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Plant Cell 12: 1551-1567.
19. Consendai A, Hörandl E. 2010. Cytotype stability, facultative apomixis and geographical parthenogenesis in Ranunculus kuepferi (Ranunculaceae). Annals of Botany 105: 457-470.
20. Cuenca J, Froelicher Y, Aleza P, Juárez J, Navarro L, Ollitrault P. 2011. Multilocus half tetrad analysis and centromere mapping in Citrus; evidence of SDR mechanism for 2n megagametophyte production and partial chromosome interference in mandarin cv Fortune. Heredity (in press) doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.33.
21. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, et al. 2006. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Research 16: 738-749. (Pubitemid 43830694)
22. Dellaporta J, Hicks JB. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reports 1: 19-21.
23. Esen A, Soost RK. 1971. Unexpected triploids in Citrus: their origin, identification and possible use. Journal of Heredity 62: 329-333.
24. Esen A, Soost RK. 1972. Tetraploid progenies from 2x x 4x crosses of Citrus and their origin. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 97: 410-414.
25. Esen A, Soost RK. 1973. Precocious development and germination of spontaneous triploid seeds in Citrus. Journal of Heredity 64: 147-154.
26. Esen A, Soost RK. 1977. Relation of unexpected polyploids to diploid megagametophytes and embryo: endosperm ploidy ratio in Citrus. In: Proceedings del Primer Congreso Mundial de Citricultura. Valencia: International Society of Citriculture, 53-63.
27. Esen A, Soost RK, Geraci G. 1979. Genetic evidence for the origin of diploid megagametophytes in Citrus. The Journal of Heredity 70: 5-8.
28. Flagel LE,Wendel JF. 2010. Evolutionary rate variation, genomic dominance and duplicate gene expression evolution during allotetraploid cotton speciation. New Phytologist 186: 184-193.
29. Froelicher Y, Dambier D, Bassene JB, et al. 2008. Characterization of microsatellite markers in mandarin orange (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 119-122. (Pubitemid 350231176)
30. Frost HB. 1926. Polyembryony, heterozygosis and chimeras in Citrus. Hilgardia 1: 365-402.
31. Frost HB, Soost RK. 1968. Seed reproduction, development of gametes and embryos. In: Reuther W, Batchelor LD, Webber HB, eds. The citrus industry, vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California, 290-324.
32. Galán-Sauco V, Grajal Martín MJ, Fernández Galván D, Coello Torres A, Juárez J, Navarro L. 2001. Occurrence of spontaneous tetraploid nucellar mango plants. HortScience 36: 755-757. (Pubitemid 32804413)
33. Geraci G, Esen A, Soost RK. 1975. Triploid progenies from 2x - 2x crosses of Citrus cultivars. Journal of Heredity 66: 177-178.
34. Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Grosser JW, Ollitrault P, Olivares O. 2000. Somatic hybridization in Citrus: an effective tool to facilitate variety improvement. In vitro Cellular and Development Biology - Plant 36: 434-449.
36. Grosser WJ, Hyum JA, Calovic M, et al. 2010. Production of new allotetraploid and autotetraploid Citrus breeding parents: focus on zipperskin mandarins. HortScience 45: 1160-1163.
37. Hagerup O. 1931. Über Polyploidie in Beziehung zu Klima, Ökologie und Phylogenie. Hereditas 16: 19-40.
38. Harlan JR, DeWet JM. 1975. On Ö. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy. The Botanical Review 41: 361-390.
39. Hörandl E. 2006. The complex causality of geographical parthenogenesis. New Phytologist 171: 525-538. (Pubitemid 44051306)
40. Hufft-Kao R. 2008. Origins and widespread distribution of co-existing polyploids in Arnica cordifolia (Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 101: 145-152.
41. Husband BC, Schemske DW, Goodwillie C, Burton TL. 2002. Pollen competition as a unilateral mechanism of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London 269: 2565-2571. (Pubitemid 36071837)
42. Hutchison DJ, Barrett HC. 1981. Tetraploid frequency in nucellar seedlings from single trees of Carrizo and Troyer Citrus hybrids. In: Proceedings of 4th International Citrus Congress. Tokyo: International Society of Citriculture, 27-29.
43. Iwamasa M, Nito N, Ling JT. 1988. Intra and intergeneric hybridization in the orange subfamily, Auranthioideae. In: Proceedings of 6th International Citrus Congress. Balaban, PA: International Society of Citriculture, 123-130.
44. Johnson AW, Packer JG, Reese G. 1965. Polyploidy, distribution, and environment. In: Wright HE Jr, Frey DG, eds. The Quaternary of the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 497-507.
45. Kamiri M, Stift M, Srairi I, et al. 2011. Evidence for non-disomic inheritance in a Citrus interspecific tetraploid somatic between C. reticulata and C. lemon hybrid using SSR markers and cytogenetic analysis. Plant Cell Reports, doi:10.1007/s00299-011-1050-x.
46. Kijas JMH, Thomas MR, Fowler JCS, Roose ML. 1997. Integration of trinucleotide microsatellites into a linkage map of Citrus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 701-706. (Pubitemid 27201463)
47. Kobayashi S, Ieda I, Nakatani M. 1981. Role of the primordium cell in nucellar embryogenesis in citrus. In: Proceedings of 4th International Citrus Congress. Tokyo: International Society of Citriculture, 44-48.
48. Koltunow AM. 1993. Apomixis: embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization in ovules. Plant Cell 5: 1425-1437. (Pubitemid 2001897)
49. Koltunow AM, Grossniklaus U. 2003. Apomixis, a developmental perspective. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54: 547-574.
50. Krug CA. 1943. Chromosome numbers in the subfamily Aurantioideae with special reference to the genus Citrus. Botanical Gazette 48: 602-611.
51. Lai Z, Gross BL, Zou Y, Andrews J, Rieseberg LH. 2006. Microarray analysis reveals differential gene expression in hybrid sunflower species. Molecular Ecology 15: 1213-1227.
52. Landry CR, Hartl DL, Ranz JM. 2007. Genome clashes in hybrids: insights from gene expression. Heredity 99: 483-493. (Pubitemid 350006183)
53. Lapin WK. 1937. Investigations on polyploidy in Citrus. USSR all-Union Science Research Institute Humid Subtropics Works 1: 1-68.
54. Lee LS. 1988. Citrus polyploidy. Origins and potential for cultivar improvement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39: 735-747.
55. Longley AE. 1925. Polycary, polyspory and polyploidy in Citrus and Citrus relatives. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science 15: 347-351.
56. Löve Á, Löve D. 1957. Arctic polyploidy. Proceedings of the Genetics Society of Canada 2: 23-27.
57. Luro F, Maddy F, Ollitrault P, Rist D. 2000. Identification of 2n gamete parental origin and mode of nuclear restitution of spontaneous triploid Citrus hybrids. Proceedings of 9th International Citrus Congress, December 3-7, Orlando, Florida: International Society of Citriculture, 168-169.
58. Luro F, Maddy F, Jacquemond C, et al. 2004. Identification and evaluation of diplogyny in clementine (Citrus clementina) for use in breeding. In: XI Eucarpia Symposium on Fruit Breeding and Genetics. Acta Horticulturae 663: 841-847.
59. Luro F, Costantino G, Terol JF, et al. 2008. Transferability of the EST-SSRs developed on Nules clementine (Citrus clementina Hort ex Tan) to other Citrus species and their effectiveness for genetic mapping. BMC Genomics 9: 287. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-287.
60. Manton I. 1950. Problems of cytology and evolution in the Pteridophyta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Marsden JE, Schwager SJ, May B. 1987. Single-locus inheritance in the tetraploid treefrog Hyla versicolor with an analysis of expected progeny ratios in tetraploid organisms. Genetics 116: 299-311.
62. Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264: 421-424.
63. Mather K. 1936. Segregation and linkage in autotetraploids. Journal of Genetics. 32: 287-314.
64. McClintock B. 1984. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226: 792-801. (Pubitemid 15200674)
65. Muller HJ. 1914. A new mode of segregation in Gregory's tetraploid primulas. American Naturalist 48: 508-512.
66. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-479.
67. Ollitrault P, Dambier D, Luro F, Froelicher Y. 2008. Ploidy manipulation for breeding seedless triploid citrus. Plant Breeding Reviews 20: 323-354.
68. Ollitrault P, Terol J, Chen C, et al. 2011. A Reference linkage map of C. clementina based on SNPs, SSRs and indels. In: Plant & Animal Genomes XIX Conference, January 15-19, 2011, San Diego, California. http://www.intl-pag.org/ 19/abstracts/P05h-PAGXIX-477.html.
69. Osborn TC, Pires JC, Birchler JA, et al. 2003. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends in Genetics 19: 141-147. (Pubitemid 36279181)
70. Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401-437. (Pubitemid 32065927)
71. Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP. 2006. DARwin software. Available at http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin.
72. Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F. 2003. Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC, eds. Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Montpellier: Enfield, Science Publishers, 43-76.
73. Raghuvanshi SS. 1962. Cytologenetical studies in genus Citrus IV. Evolution in genus Citrus. Cytologia 27: 172-188.
74. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501. (Pubitemid 29033040)
75. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plant. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639.
76. Richards AJ. 1996. Why is gametophytic apomixis almost restricted to polyploids? The gametophyte- expressed lethal model. Apomixis Newsletter 9: 1-3.
77. Roche D, Hanna WW, Ozias-Akins P. 2001. Is supernumerary chromatin involved in gametophytic apomixis of polyploid plants? Sexual Plant Reproduction 13: 343-349.
78. Saleh B, Allario T, Dambier D, Ollitrault P, Morillon R. 2008. Tetraploid citrus rootstocks are more tolerant to salt stress than diploid. Comptes rendus biolgies 331: 703-710.
79. Salmon A, Ainouche ML, Wendel JF. 2005. Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Molecular Ecology 14: 1163-1175. (Pubitemid 40466242)
80. Schranz ME, Dobes C, Koch MA, Mitchell-Olds TM. 2005. Sexual reproduction, hybridization, apomixis, and polyploidization in the genus Boechera (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1797-1810. (Pubitemid 41540861)
81. Schwarz SF. 2001. Autotetraploides espontáneos en patrones de cítricos: incidencia, características y comportamiento en vivero y campo. PhD thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain.
82. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1993. The dynamic nature of polyploid genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92: 8089-8091.
83. Soost RK. 1987. Breeding citrus-genetics and nucellar embryony. In: Abbott AJ, Atkin RK, eds. Improving vegetatively propagated crops. London: Academic Press, 83-110.
84. Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
85. Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.
86. Stupar RM, Bhaskar PB, Yandell BS, et al. 2007. Phenotypic and transcriptomic changes associated with potato autopolyploidization. Genetics 176: 2055-2067. (Pubitemid 47360641)
87. Swingle WT, Reece PC. 1967. The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Batchelor LD, Webber HJ, eds. The citrus industry, vol. 1. Riverside, CA: University of California, 190-430.
88. Tachikawa T, Tanaka Y, Hara S. 1961. Investigation on the breeding of Citrus trees. Study on the breeding of triploid Citrus varieties. Bulletin of the Shizuoka Prefectural Citrus Experiment Station 4: 33-44.
89. Thompson JD, Lumaret R. 1992. The evolutionary dynamics of polyploid plants: origins, establishment and persistence. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7: 302-307. (Pubitemid 23398264)
90. Wang J, Tian L, Madlung A, et al. 2004. Stochastic and epigenetic changes of gene expression in Arabidopsis polyploids. Genetics 167: 1961-1973. (Pubitemid 39265930)
91. Wang JL, Tian L, Lee HS, et al. 2006. Genome wide non additive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics 172: 507-517. (Pubitemid 43345511)
92. Wendel J, Doyle J. 2005. Polyploidy and evolution in plants. In: Henry RJ, ed. Plant diversity and evolution. Genotypic and phenotypic variation in higher plants. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 97-117.