Reproductive factors associated with mammographic density: A Korean co-twin control study

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 567-572

  Sung, Joohon ^a   Song, Yun Mi ^b   Stone, Jennifer ^c   Lee, Kayoung ^d   Lee, Donghun ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast feeding; Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Menarche; Parity

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FEEDING; CANCER RISK; CHILDBIRTH; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ESTROGEN THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; KOREA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MENARCHE; MENSTRUATION; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; PARITY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; TWINS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCTIVE HISTORY; RISK FACTORS; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 79959703931     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1469-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. JL Kelsey MD Gammon EM John 1993 Reproductive factors and breast cancer Epidemiol Rev 15 36 47 8405211 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FgvFCisQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23269069)
2. T Li L Sun N Miller T Nicklee J Woo L Hulse-Smith MS Tsao R Khokha L Martin N Boyd 2005 The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14 343 349 15734956 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0490 (Pubitemid 40270095)
3. C Byrne C Schairer J Wolfe N Parekh M Salane LA Brinton R Hoover R Haile 1995 Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status J Natl Cancer Inst 87 1622 1629 7563205 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fis1aluw%3D%3D
4. NF Boyd GA Lockwood JW Byng DL Tritchler MJ Yaffe 1998 Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7 1133 1144 9865433 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FotFSgsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29001671)
5. C Nagata T Matsubara H Fujita Y Nagao C Shibuya Y Kashiki H Shimizu 2005 Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women Br J Cancer 92 2102 2106 15956963 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602643 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzgvVWjsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40966243)
6. G Maskarinec I Pagano G Lurie LR Wilkens LN Kolonel 2005 Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study Am J Epidemiol 162 743 752 16150892 10.1093/aje/kwi270 (Pubitemid 41437761)
7. G Ursin H Ma AH Wu L Bernstein M Salane YR Parisky M Astrahan CC Siozon MC Pike 2003 Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12 332 338 12692108 (Pubitemid 36427994)
8. F de Waard JJ Rombach HJ Collette B Slotboom 1984 Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns J Natl Cancer Inst 72 1277 1282 6587148 (Pubitemid 14124252)
9. J Whitehead T Carlile KJ Kopecky DJ Thompson FI Gilbert Jr. AJ Present BA Threatt P Krook E Hadaway 1985 The relationship between Wolfe's classification of mammograms, accepted breast cancer risk factors, and the incidence of breast cancer Am J Epidemiol 122 994 1006 4061448 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2FkslOqtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16170035)
10. NF Boyd GS Dite J Stone A Gunasekara DR English MR McCredie GG Giles D Tritchler A Chiarelli MJ Yaffe JL Hopper 2002 Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 886 894 12239257 10.1056/NEJMoa013390
11. J Stone GS Dite A Gunasekara DR English MR McCredie GG Giles JN Cawson RA Hegele AM Chiarelli MJ Yaffe NF Boyd JL Hopper 2006 The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 612 617 16614099 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0127
12. Sung J, Song YM, Stone J, Lee K, Jeong JI, Kim SS (2010) Genetic influences on mammographic density in Korean twin and family: the Healthy Twin study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:467-474
13. JY Hwang C Shin EA Frongillo KR Shin I Jo 2003 Secular trend in age at menarche for South Korean women born between 1920 and 1986: the Ansan Study Ann Hum Biol 30 434 442 12881142 10.1080/0301446031000111393 (Pubitemid 36872484)
14. WP Mauldin 1978 Patterns of fertility decline in developing countries, 1950-75 Stud Fam Plann 9 75 84 663991 10.2307/1965943 1:STN:280: DyaE1c3gsFWitA%3D%3D
15. J Sung SI Cho K Lee M Ha EY Choi JS Choi H Kim J Kim KS Hong Y Kim KY Yoo C Park YM Song 2006 Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea-protocols and current status Twin Res Hum Genet 9 844 848 17254419 (Pubitemid 46093768)
16. JW Byng MJ Yaffe RA Jong RS Shumak GA Lockwood DL Tritchler NF Boyd 1998 Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms Radiographics 18 1587 1598 9821201 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FjvVKnsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 128467077)
17. YM Song D Lee K Lee HJ Lee J Sung B Han 2010 Validity of the zygosity questionnaire and characteristics of zygosity-misdiagnosed twin pairs in the Healthy Twin Study of Korea Twin Res Hum Genet 13 223 230 20477720 10.1375/twin.13.3.223
18. J Stone RM Warren E Pinney J Warwick J Cuzick 2009 Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density Am J Epidemiol 170 1571 1578 19910376 10.1093/aje/kwp313
19. CM Vachon KR Brandt K Ghosh CG Scott SD Maloney MJ Carston VS Pankratz TA Sellers 2007 Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16 43 49 17220330 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI- 06-0738 (Pubitemid 46174262)
20. G Maskarinec L Meng 2000 A case-control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii Breast Cancer Res Treat 63 153 161 11097091 10.1023/A:1006486319848 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgtlGrsg%3D%3D
21. J Brisson NL Sadowsky JA Twaddle AS Morrison P Cole F Merletti 1982 The relation of mammographic features of the breast to breast cancer risk factors Am J Epidemiol 115 438 443 7064978 1:STN:280:DyaL387lslWrtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 12136757)
22. LM Butler EB Gold GA Greendale CJ Crandall F Modugno N Oestreicher CP Quesenberry Jr. LA Habel 2008 Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Breast Cancer Res Treat 112 165 174 18066689 10.1007/s10549-007-9840-0
23. D Heng F Gao R Jong E Fishell M Yaffe L Martin T Li J Stone L Sun J Hopper NF Boyd 2004 Risk factors for breast cancer associated with mammographic features in Singaporean Chinese women Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 1751 1758 15533903 (Pubitemid 39482952)
24. JS Grove MJ Goodman FI Gilbert Jr. MP Mi 1985 Factors associated with mammographic pattern Br J Radiol 58 21 25 4063637 10.1259/0007-1285-58-685-21 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2Flt1WksA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 15158878)
25. MC Pike MD Krailo BE Henderson JT Casagrande DG Hoel 1983 'Hormonal' risk factors, 'breast tissue age' and the age-incidence of breast cancer Nature 303 767 770 6866078 10.1038/303767a0 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3ksV2muw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 13054488)
26. SM Gapstur P Lopez LA Colangelo J Wolfman HL Van RE Hendrick 2003 Associations of breast cancer risk factors with breast density in Hispanic women Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12 1074 1080 14578145 (Pubitemid 37310265)
27. G Ursin CL Sun WP Koh KS Khoo F Gao AH Wu MC Yu 2006 Associations between soy, diet, reproductive factors, and mammographic density in Singapore Chinese women Nutr Cancer 56 128 135 17474857 10.1207/s15327914nc5602-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjs1yls74%3D (Pubitemid 46417671)
28. L Yang KH Jacobsen 2008 A systematic review of the association between breastfeeding and breast cancer J Womens Health 17 1635 1645 10.1089/jwh.2008.0917
29. TJ Key PK Verkasalo E Banks 2001 Epidemiology of breast cancer Lancet Oncol 2 133 140 11902563 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00254-0 1:STN:280: DC%2BD387ntFelsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33585924)
30. CC Tay AF Glasier AS McNeilly 1996 Twenty-four hour patterns of prolactin secretion during lactation and the relationship to suckling and the resumption of fertility in breast-feeding women Hum Reprod 11 950 955 8671369 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XksVOksLw%3D (Pubitemid 26177260)
31. R Das BK Vonderhaar 1997 Prolactin as a mitogen in mammary cells J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2 29 39 10887517 10.1023/A:1026369412612 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czksFOhuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 127717410)
32. E Riza SSI dos SB De N Perry E Karadedou-Zafiriadou D Linos DD Remoundos A Linos 2005 Correlates of high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns by menopausal status in a rural population in Northern Greece Eur J Cancer 41 590 600 15737565 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.12.014 (Pubitemid 40292740)
33. NF Boyd J Stone LJ Martin R Jong E Fishell M Yaffe G Hammond S Minkin 2002 The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities Br J Cancer 87 876 882 12373602 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600537 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nhsFegsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 35252963)
34. GS Dite LC Gurrin GB Byrnes J Stone A Gunasekara MR McCredie DR English GG Giles J Cawson RA Hegele AM Chiarelli MJ Yaffe NF Boyd JL Hopper 2008 Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 3474 3481 19064564 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2636
35. OC Van H Bosmans SA Van K Joossens V Celis GM Van I Verslegers K Nijs F Rogge G Marchal 2006 Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial Eur Radiol 16 1360 1366 10.1007/s00330-005-0134-9 (Pubitemid 43834724)
36. P Skaane 2009 Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review Acta Radiol 50 3 14 19037825 10.1080/02841850802563269 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FpslSrtw%3D%3D