Learning objects, pedagogy and reuse

Learning Technology in Transition: from Individual Enthusiasm to Institutional Implementation

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 31-44

  Boyle, Tom ^a   Cook, John ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959700252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Beetham, H., Taylor, J., & Twining, P. (2001). SoURCE Evaluation Report. [On-Line]. Available: http://www.eres.ac.uk/source/docs/met-del-2.pdf.
2. Boyle, T. (2002). Towards a theoretical base for educational multimedia design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. [On-Line]. Available: http://wwwjime. open.ac.uk/2001/boyle/boyle.html
3. Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19,1, 46-58.
4. Boyle, T., & Cook, J. (2001). Towards a pedagogically sound basis for learning object portability and re-use. In G. Kennedy., M. Keppell., C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.) Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 101-109). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne. [On-Line] Available: http://www.medfac.unimelb.edu.au/ascilite2001/pdf/papers/boylet.pdf
5. Bradley, C. & Boyle, T. (2003). The development and deployment of multimedia learning objects. In E. Duval., W. Hodgkins., D. Rehak and R. Robson (Eds.) Proceedings of Learning Objects 2003 Symposium: Lessons Learned, Questions Asked (pp13-18) Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. [On-Line] Available: http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~erikd/PRES/2003/LO2003/Bradley.pdf
6. Bradley, C., Boyle, T. & Haynes, R.(2003). Design and evaluation of multimedia learning objects. In D. Lasner and C. McNaught (Eds.) Proceedings of Ed Media 2003, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Hawaii, June 2003 (pp.1239-1245). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts, Journal of Child Language, 2, 1-19.
8. Currier, S. (2003). Quality Assurance for Digital Learning Object Repositories: Can Authors Create Good Metadata? Research paper presented at ALT-C 2003, Sheffield.
9. Duval, E., Hodgkins W., Rehak D. & Robson, R. (2003). Introduction. In E. Duval., W. Hodgkins., D. Rehak and R. Robson (Eds.) Proceedings of Learning Objects 2003 Symposium: Lessons Learned, Questions Asked (pp13-18) Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. [On-Line] Available [On-Line] Available:http://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/symposium2003.htm
10. Hanley, G. (2003). MERLOT: Multimedia Online Resource for Learning and Online Teaching. In D. Lasner & C. McNaught (Eds.) Proceedings of Ed Media 2003, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Hawaii, June 2003 (pp.1281-1284). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
11. IEEE. (2002). Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. [On-Line]. Available:http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_WD6_4.pdf.
12. IMS Global learning Consortium. (2001) IMS Content Packaging Specification. [On-Line]. Available: http://www.imsproject.org/content/packaging/index.cfm.
13. Koppi, T., & Hodgson, L. (2001). Universitas 21 Learning Resource Catalogue using IMS Metadata and a New Classification of Learning Objects. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001(1), 998-1001. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/8646
14. Koppi, T., & Lavitt, N. (2003). Institutional use of learning objects three years on: lessons learned and future directions. Paper presented at Learning Objects 2003 Symposium Hawaii June 24. [On-line]. Available:http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~erikd/PRES/2003/LO2003/Koppi.pdf
15. Jenkins, T. (2002). On the difficulty of learning to program. In Proceedings of 3rd annual conference of the LTSN-ICS, Loughborough, UK. Loughborough: LTSN-ICS.
16. Jenkins, T., & Davy, J. (2001). Diversity and motivation in introductory programming.Italics, 1,1. [On-line]. Available:http://www.ics.ltsn.ac.uk/pub/italics/issue1/tjenkins/003.html.
17. Mayes, T. (2003). Vision and Theoretical Perspectives: Introduction to Part 1. In Littlejohn, A. and Buckingham Shum, S. (Eds.) Reusing Online Resources (Special Issue)Journal of Interactive Media in Education. [On-line]. Available: http://wwwjime. open.ac.uk/2003/1/
18. McGee, P. (2003). Remark made during the opening panel of the Learning Objects 2003 Symposium. Hawaii, June 24 2003.
19. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. New York:Basic Books.
20. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine. New York: Basic books.
21. Piaget, J. (1970) Piaget’s Theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.) Carmichael’s manual of child psychology, 3rd Edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
22. Polsani, P.R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3, 4. [On-Line]. Available:http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v03/i04/Polsani/
23. Wiley, D. (2003). Learning objects: difficulties and opportunities. [On-line]. Available:http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/lo_do.pdf
24. Wiley, D., Padron, S., Brent, L., Dawson, D., Nelson, L., Barclay, M., & Wade, D. (2003). Using O2 to overcome learning objects limitations. In E. Duval., W. Hodgkins., D. Rehak & R. Robson (Eds.) Proceedings of Learning Objects 2003 Symposium:Lessons Learned, Questions Asked (pp61-70) Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. [On-line]. Available:http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~erikd/PRES/2003/LO2003/Wiley.pdf
25. Vygotsky L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.