Breast cancer screening beliefs, recommendations and practices

Cancer

Volumn 117, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 3101-3111

  Meissner, Helen I ^a   Klabunde, Carrie N ^b   Han, Paul K ^c   Benard, Vicki B ^d   Breen, Nancy ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c MAINE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; mammography; physicians; primary care; screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST SELF EXAMINATION; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URBAN POPULATION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79959697178     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25873     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Meissner HI, Rimer BK, Davis WW, Eisner E, Siegler IC,. Another round in the mammography controversy. J Womens Health. 2003; 12: 1-16.
2. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC,. Cochrane Review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1340-1342. (Pubitemid 33016501)
3. The Editors. When evidence collides with anecdote, politics, and emotion: breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152: 531-532.
4. Meissner HI, Smith RA, Rimer BK, et al. Promoting cancer screening: learning from experience. Cancer. 2004; 101 (suppl 5): 1107-1117. (Pubitemid 39100409)
5. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S,. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1644-1656. (Pubitemid 23315423)
6. National Institutes of Health, Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 1015-1026.
7. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 716-726.
8. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003; 53: 141-169. (Pubitemid 36722306)
9. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 42: breast cancer screening. ACOG Pract Bull. 2003; 101: 821-831.
10. Ryerson AB, Miller JW, Eheman CR, Leadbetter S, White MC,. Recent trends in US mammography use from 2000-2006: a population-based analysis. Prev Med. 2008; 47: 477-482.
11. Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C, Lewis R, Sowden A, Kleijnen J,. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4: 1-133.
12. Klabunde CN, O'Malley MS, Kaluzny AD,. Physicians' reactions to change in recommendations for mammography screening. Am J Prev Med. 1997; 13: 432-438. (Pubitemid 28006736)
13. Saint M, Gildengorin G, Sawaya GF,. Current cervical neoplasia screening practices of obstetrician/gynecologists in the US. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 414-421. (Pubitemid 40214973)
14. Yabroff K, Saraiya M, Meissner H, et al. Specialty differences in primary care physician reports of Papanicolaou test screening practices: a national survey, 2006 to 2007. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 602-611.
15. Nadel M, Berkowitz Z, Klabunde C, Smith R, Coughlin S, White M,. Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of US primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25: 833-839.
16. American Cancer Society. 1989 Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 1990; 40: 77-101.
17. Klabunde C, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW,. A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med. 2003; 36: 352-362. (Pubitemid 36299087)
18. Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 9.0.1. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2005.
19. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 344-346.
20. Han PKJ, Kobrin SC, Klein WMP, Davis WW, Stefanek M, Taplin SH,. Perceived ambiguity about screening mammography recommendations: association with future mammography uptake and perceptions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16: 458-466. (Pubitemid 46548649)
21. Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, et al. Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. Radiology. 2005; 236: 37-46. (Pubitemid 40853292)
22. Berlin L,. Breast cancer, mammography, and malpractice litigation: the controversies continue. Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 1229-1237. (Pubitemid 36504607)
23. Haggerty J, Tudiver F, Brown J, Herbert C, Ciampi A, Guibert R,. Patients' anxiety and expectations: how they influence family physicians' decisions to order cancer screening tests. Cancer Fam Physician. 2005; 51: 1659.
24. Qaseem A, Snow V, Sherif K, et al. Screening mammography for women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 511-515. (Pubitemid 351650560)
25. Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L,. Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations? J Am Board Fam Med. 2001; 14: 352-361. (Pubitemid 33607162)
26. Bhosle M, Samuel S, Vosuri V, Paskett E, Balkrishnan R,. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007; 103: 53-59. (Pubitemid 46653259)
27. Lane DS, Caplan LS, Grimson R,. Trends in mammography use and their relation to physician and other factors. Cancer Detect Prev. 1996; 20: 332-341. (Pubitemid 26311802)
28. Lafata JE, Simpkins J, Lamerato L, Poisson L, Divine G, Johnson CC,. The economic impact of false-positive cancer screens. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004; 13: 2126-2132. (Pubitemid 40054307)
29. Lipkus I, Halabi S, Strigo T, Rimer BK,. The impact of abnormal mammograms on psychosocial outcomes and subsequent screening. Psychooncology. 2000; 9: 402-410.
30. Swan J, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States. Cancer. 2010; 116: 4872-4881.
31. Peres J,. Mammography screening: after the storm, calls for more personalized approaches. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102: 9-11.