Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 129, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 3181-3193

  Goldman, Simon A ^a   Baer, Thomas ^a   Moore, Brian C J ^a  

^a University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTER FREQUENCY; COMODULATION MASKING RELEASE; ENVELOPE STATISTICS; LINEAR FREQUENCY; NOISE BANDS; SIGNAL FREQUENCIES; TEMPORAL FINE STRUCTURE;

FREQUENCY BANDS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH PERCEPTION; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959617230     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3560122     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bregman, A. S., Abramson, J., Doehring, P., and Darwin, C. J. (1985). Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation., Percept. Psychophys. 37, 483-493.
2. Buss, E., Grose, J. H., and Hall, J. W. III (2009). Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2455-2466.
3. Buss, E., Hall, J. W., and Grose, J. H. (1998). Change in envelope beats as a possible cue in comodulation masking release (CMR)., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 1592-1597. (Pubitemid 28115170)
4. Dau, T., Ewert, S., and Oxenham, A. J. (2009). Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2182-2188.
5. Ernst, S. M., and Verhey, J. L. (2006). Role of suppression and retro-cochlear processes in comodulation masking release., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3843-3852. (Pubitemid 44888080)
6. Ernst, S. M., and Verhey, J. L. (2008). Peripheral and central aspects of auditory across-frequency processing., Brain Res. 1220, 246-255. (Pubitemid 352004024)
7. Fantini, D. A., Moore, B. C. J., and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1993). Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2106-2115.
8. Glasberg, B. R., and Moore, B. C. J. (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data., Hear. Res. 47, 103-138.
9. Gockel, H., Moore, B. C. J., and Carlyon, R. P. (2001). Influence of rate of change of frequency on the overall pitch of frequency modulated tones., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 701-712. (Pubitemid 32144004)
10. Goldman, S. A., Baer, T., and Moore, B. C. J. (2010). Within-channel cues to comodulation masking release for single and symmetrically placed pairs of flanking bands., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 2988-2997.
11. Grose, J. H., and Hall, J. W. (1993). Comodulation masking release: Is comodulation sufficient, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2896-2902.
12. Grose, J. H., Buss, E., and Hall, J. W. III (2009). Within- and across-channel factors in the multiband comodulation masking release paradigm., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 282-293.
13. Hall, J. W., and Grose, J. H. (1990). Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 119-125. (Pubitemid 20243592)
14. Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., and Haggard, M. P. (1990). Effects of flanking band proximity, number, and modulation pattern on comodulation masking release., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 269-283. (Pubitemid 20090731)
15. Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., and Hatch, D. R. (1996). Effects of masker gating for signal detection in unmodulated and modulated bandlimited noise., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 2365-2372.
16. Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., and Mendoza, L. (1995). Across-channel processes in masking., in Hearing, edited by, B. C. J. Moore, (Academic Press, San Diego), pp. 243-266.
17. Hall, J. W., Haggard, M. P., and Fernandes, M. A. (1984). Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 50-56. (Pubitemid 14069271)
18. Hatch, D. R., Arné, B. C., and Hall, J. W. (1995). Comodulation masking release (CMR): Effects of gating as a function of number of flanking bands and masker bandwidth., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3768-3774.
19. Hicks, M. L., and Bacon, S. P. (1995). Some factors influencing comodulation masking release and across-channel masking., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2504-2514.
20. ISO 389-8 (2004). Acoustics-Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment-Part 8: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Circumaural Earphones (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).
21. Johnson, D. H. (1980). The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68, 1115-1122. (Pubitemid 11202534)
22. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477.
23. Martens, J. -P. (1982). A new theory for multi-tone masking., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 397-405.
24. McFadden, D. (1986). Comodulation masking release: Effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 1658-1667. (Pubitemid 17208421)
25. Moore, B. C. J. (1975). Mechanisms of masking., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 391-399.
26. Moore, B. C. J., and Glasberg, B. R. (1987). Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 69-79.
27. Moore, B. C. J., and Sek, A. (2009). Sensitivity of the human auditory system to temporal fine structure at high frequencies., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3186-3193.
28. Moore, B. C. J., Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1990). Some factors affecting the magnitude of comodulation masking release., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1694-1702.
29. Piechowiak, T., Ewert, S. D., and Dau, T. (2007). Modeling comodulation masking release using an equalization-cancellation mechanism., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2111-2126. (Pubitemid 46548412)
30. Richards, V. M. (1988). Components of monaural envelope correlation perception., Hear. Res. 35, 47-58.
31. Robles, L., and Ruggero, M. A. (2001). Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea., Physiol. Rev. 81, 1305-1352. (Pubitemid 32606671)
32. Schooneveldt, G. P., and Moore, B. C. J. (1987). Comodulation masking release (CMR): Effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1944-1956.
33. Schooneveldt, G. P., and Moore, B. C. J. (1989a). Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth and signal duration., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 273-281. (Pubitemid 19041123)
34. Schooneveldt, G. P., and Moore, B. C. J. (1989b). Comodulation masking release (CMR) for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency and flanking bands., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 262-272. (Pubitemid 19041122)
35. Verhey, J. L., and Ernst, S. M. (2009). Comodulation masking release for regular and irregular modulators., Hear. Res. 253, 97-106.
36. Verhey, J. L., Rennies, J., and Ernst, S. M. (2007). Influence of envelope distributions on signal detection., Acta Acust. Acust. 93, 115-121. (Pubitemid 46279427)