Patron-driven purchase on demand programs for printed books and similar materials: A chronological review and summary of findings

Library Philosophy and Practice

Volumn 2011, Issue JUNE, 2011, Pages

  Tyler, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959596366     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15220222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aguilar, W. (1986). The application of relative use and interlibrary demand in collection development. Collection Management, 8(1), 15-24.
2. Alder, N. L. (2007). Direct purchase as a function of interlibrary loan: Buying books versus borrowing. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 18(1), 9-15.
3. Allen, M., Ward, S. M., Wray, T., & Debus-López, K. E. (2003). Patron-focused services in three US libraries: Collaborative interlibrary loan, collection development and acquisitions. Interlending & Document Supply, 31(2), 138-141.
4. American Library Association. Office for Research & Statistics. (2009). The condition of U.S. libraries: Academic library trends, 1999-2009. The Association. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/research/librarystats/academic/Condition_of_Libra ries_1999.20.pdf
5. Anderson, K. J., Freeman, R. S., Hérubel, J. V. M., Mykytiuk, L. J., Nixon, J. M., & Ward, S. M. (2002). Buy, don't borrow: Bibliographers' analysis of academic library collection development through interlibrary loan requests. Collection Management, 27(3/4), 1-10.
6. Anderson, K. J., Freeman, R. S., Hérubel, J. V. M., Mykytiuk, L. J., Nixon, J. M., & Ward, S. M. (2010). Liberal arts books on demand: A decade of patron-driven collection development, part I. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 125-141.
7. Badics, J. (2004, September). Acquisitions and interlibrary loan together: Good marriage or will George W. Bush object? Against the Grain, 16, 52-54.
8. Barnhart, A. C. (2010). Want buy-in? Let your students do the buying! A case study of course-integrated collection development. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 237-243.
9. Beaton, B., & Kirk, J. H. (1988). Applications of an automated interlibrary loan log. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 14(1), 24-27.
10. Bertuca, C., Lelonek, C., Tuohy, R., Ortner, J., Bouvier, A., Dithomas, S., et al. (2009). Two ILLiad clients, one desktop, purchase on demand: Sharing a university's collection, staff, and expertise. Journal of Access Services, 6(4), 497-512.
11. Blecic, D. D. (2000). Monograph use at an academic health sciences library: The first three years of shelf life. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(2), 145-151.
12. Bombeld, M., & Hanerfeld, A. (2004, April). The surprising truth about faculty perception and use of collection development opportunities: One library's case study. Against the Grain, 16, 18-22.
13. Britten, W. A. (1990). A use statistic for collection management: The 80/20 rule revisited. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 14(2), 183-189.
14. Brug, S., & MacWaters, C. (2004, Fall). Patron-driven purchasing from interlibrary loan requests.Colorado Libraries, 30, 36-38.
15. Bulick, S., Sabor, W. N., & Flynn, R. (1979). Circulation and in-house use of books. In A. Kent, et al. (eds.), Use of library materials: The University of Pittsburgh study (pp. 9-55). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
16. Burchfield, A., & Garewal, K. (2009). Meeting evolving research and curriculum needs: A survey of interlibrary loan and OhioLINK borrowing at an academic law library. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 19(2), 137-144.
17. Burrell, Q. L. (1985). The 80/20 rule: Library lore or statistical law? Journal of Documentation, 41(1), 24-39.
18. Byrd, G. D., Thomas, D. A., & Hughes, K. E. (1982). Collection development using interlibrary loan borrowing and acquisitions statistics. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 70(1), 1-9.
19. Campbell, S. A. (2006). To buy or to borrow, that is the question. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, DocumentDelivery & Electronic Reserve, 16(3), 35-39.
20. Carlisle Fountain, K., & Frederiksen, L. (2010). Just passing through: Patron-initiated. collection development in Northwest academic libraries. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 185-195.
21. Chadwell, F. A. (2009). What's next for collection management and managers? Usercentered collection management. Collection Management, 34(2), 69-78.
22. Chan, G. R. Y. C. (2004). Purchase instead of borrow: An international perspective. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 14(4), 23-37.
23. Clendenning, L. F. (2001, January). Purchase express for any user request. College & Research Libraries News, 62, 16-17.
24. Comer, A., & Lorenzen, E. (2006). Is purchase on demand a worthy model? Do patrons really know what they want? Charleston Conference Proceedings, 2006, Charleston, South Carolina. 26th 171-179.
25. Coopey, B. M., & Snowman, A. M. (2006, February). ATG special report -- ILL purchase express. Against the Grain, 18, 46-49.
26. Cornell University Library. (2007). Buy or borrow. Retrieved October 8, 2010, from http://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/12349/1/COL_2007-03-07Buy_or_ Borrow.pdf.
27. Dana, J. C. (1896, December). Hear the other side. Library Journal, 21, 1-5.
28. Davidson, J. S. (1943). The use of books in a college library. College & Research Libraries, 4(3), 294-297.
29. Drott, M. C., & Griffith, B. C. (1976). Interlibrary loan analysis in collection development. Library Resources & Technical Services, 20(1), 98-100.
30. Egan, N. (2007). Opportunities for interlibrary loan and interlibrary loan librarians. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 17(4), 43-54.
31. Eldredge, J. D. (1998). The vital few meet the trivial many: Unexpected use patterns in a monographs collection. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(4), 496-503.
32. Fenske, R. E. (1994). Evaluation of monograph selection in a health sciences library. Bulletin of theMedical Library Association, 82(3), 265-270.
33. Foss, M. (2007). Books-on-demand pilot program: An innovative "patron-centric" approach to enhance the library collection. Journal of Access Services, 5(1), 306-315.
34. Fussler, H. H., & Simon, J. L. (1969). Patterns in the use of books in large research libraries. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35. Gee, W., & Shirkey, C. (2010). Giving patrons what they want: An analysis of a thesis and dissertation purchase-on-demand project at East Carolina University. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 20(2), 103-114.
36. Gibson, T. M., & Kirkwood, P. E. (2009). A purchase-on-demand pilot project at the University of Arkansas for the Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposiums. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 19(1), 47-56.
37. Graziano, E. E. (1962). Interlibrary loan analysis: Diagnostic for scientific serials backfile acquisitions. Special Libraries, 53(5), 251-257.
38. Greenway, E. (1990, June 15). The "get-'em-all" theory of book buying. Library Journal, 115, 80-81.
39. Hardesty, L. (1981). Use of library materials at a small liberal arts college. Library Research, 3(3), 261-282.
40. Hodges, D., Preston, C., & Hamilton, M. J. (2010). Patron-initiated collection. development: Progress of a paradigm shift. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 208-221.
41. Houle, L. (2003). Convergence between interlibrary loan and acquisitions: Can it be done? Paper presented at the 8th Interlending & Document Supply International (ILDS) Conference, National Library of Australia in Canberra, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/ilds/abstracts/HouleL.pdf
42. Houle, L. (2004). Convergence between interlibrary loan and acquisitions: A science and engineering library experience. Paper presented at the Library Management in Changing Environment: Proceedings of the 25th Annual IATUL Conference, The Library of Cracow University of Technology, Kraków, Poland, 14 (new series) Retrieved from http://www.iatul.org/doclibrary/public/Conf_Proceedings/2004/Louis20Houl e.pdf
43. Hulsey, R. (June 1, 2003). Purchase on demand: A better customer service model. Library Journal, 128, 77.
44. Hussong-Christian, U., & Goergen-Doll, K. (2010). Buy request: Just in time v. just in case at OSU libraries. Paper presented at the 2010 Acquisitions Institute at Timberline Lodge, Timberline Lodge, OR. May 15-18. n.p. Retrieved from http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/jspui/handle/1957/16091.
45. Ingold, J. L. (2004, 04). Buyer beware: Using interlibrary loan requests in purchasing decisions. Against the Grain, 16, 30-34.
46. Jackson, M. E. (1989, December). Library to library. Wilson Library Bulletin, 64, 88-89.
47. Jackson, M. E. (1998). Measuring the performance of interlibrary loan operations in North American research and college libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
48. Jackson, M. E. (2004). Assessing ILL/DD services: New cost-effective alternatives. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/details/assessingillddse00jackrich
49. Khalil, M. A. (1993). Applications of an automated ILL statistical analysis as a collection development tool. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 4(1), 45-54.
50. Knievel, J. E., Wicht, H., & Connaway, L. S. (2006). Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan data in collection management. College & Research Libraries, 67(1), 35-49.
51. Kuhn, M. S. (2004, 04). The intersection where collection development and acquisitions meet interlibrary loan. Against the Grain, 16, 28-30.
52. Lahmon, J. A. (1991). Using interlibrary loan data in collection development. OCLC Micro, 7(5), 19-22.
53. Levine-Clark, M. (2010). Developing a multiformat demand-driven acquisition model. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 201-207.
54. Livingston, C., & Mays, A. (2004, 04). Using interlibrary loan data as a selection tool: Interlibrary loan trails provide collection clues. Against the Grain, 16, 22-28.
55. McGrath, W. E. (1976). Another response. Library Resources & Technical Services, 20(1), 101-103.
56. McHone-Chase, S. M. (2010). Examining change within interlibrary loan. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 20(3), 201-206.
57. Mortimore, J. M. (2005). Access-informed collection development and the academic library: Using holdings, circulation, and ILL data to develop prescient collections. Collection Management, 30(3), 21-37.
58. Mouyal, K. F. (2005). A balancing act: User demand versus programs driven collection. management at a small, regional academic library. Collection Management, 30(4), 43-57.
59. Murphy, M., & Rupp-Serrano, K. (1999). Interlibrary loan and document delivery: Lessons to be learned. Journal of Library Administration, 28(2), 15-24.
60. New, D. E., & Ott, R. Z. (1974). Interlibrary loan analysis as a collection development tool. Library Resources & Technical Services, 18(3), 275-283.
61. Nixon, J. M., Freeman, R. S., & Ward, S. M. (2010). Patron-driven acquisitions: An introduction and literature review. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 119-124.
62. Nixon, J. M., & Saunders, E. S. (2010). A study of circulation statistics of books on demand: A decade of patron-driven collection development, part 3. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 151-161.
63. Oberlander, C. (2006). Transforming the document delivery and resource sharing engine. "Libraries: Dynamic Engines for the Knowledge and Information Society." World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conference and Council, Seoul, Korea. 1-12.
64. Ochola, J. N. (2002). Use of circulation statistics and interlibrary loan data in collection management. Collection Management, 27(1), 1-13.
65. Parker, S. (1991, May). What needs to change. Wilson Library Bulletin, 65, 51-52.
66. Perdue, J., & Van Fleet, J. (1999). Borrow or buy? cost-effective delivery of monographs. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 9(4), 19-28.
67. Posner, B. (2007). Library resource sharing in the early age of Google. Library Philosophy and Practice, Special issue on Libraries and Google Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/posner.pdf.
68. Price, J., & McDonald, J. (2009). Beguiled by bananas: A retrospective study of the usage & breadth of patron vs. librarian acquired ebook collections. Paper presented at e-Book Acquisition at Academic Libraries Given at XXIX Annual Charleston Conference: Issues in Book and Serial Acquisition, Retrieved from http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php? CISOROOT=/lea&CISOPTR=175&CISOBOX=1&REC=1
69. Pritchard, S. J. (1980). Purchase and use of monographs originally requested on interlibrary loan in a medical school library. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 4(2), 135-139.
70. Ratcliffe, F. W. (1983). They don't make them like that any more. the national information resource. Library Review, 32(2), 177-195.
71. Rawlinson, N. (1981, November 15). Give 'em what they want! Library Journal, 106, 2188-2190.
72. Reed, C. A. (2004, September). Expanding the ILL role -- interlibrary loan contributing to collection development. Against the Grain, 16, 44-49.
73. Reighart, R., & Oberlander, C. (2008). Exploring the future of interlibrary loan: Generalizing the experience of the University of Virginia, USA. Interlending & Document Supply, 36(4), 184-190.
74. Reynolds, L. J., Pickett, C., Vanduinkerken, W., Smith, J., Harrell, J., & Tucker, S. (2010). User-driven acquisitions: Allowing patron requests to drive collection development in an academic library. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 244-254.
75. Roberts, M., & Cameron, K. J. (1984). A barometer of 'unmet demand': Interlibrary loans analysis and monographic acquisitions. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory., 8(1), 31-42.
76. Rottmann, F. K. (1991). To buy or to borrow: Studies of the impact of interlibrary loan on collection development in the academic library. Journal of Interlibrary Loan & Information Supply, 1(3), 17-27.
77. Ruppel, M. (2006). Tying collection development's loose ends with interlibrary loan. Collection Building, 25(3), 72-77.
78. Schulz, K. (2001). Your place or mine? Use of patron-initiated interlibrary loan vs. the local library collection among undergraduates at OhioLINK schools. Collection Management, 26(4), 15-28.
79. Silva, E. S., & Weible, C. L. (2010). Own not loan: Different request sources for purchase lists. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 180-184.
80. Stowell Bracke, M. (2010). Science and technology books on demand: A decade of patron-driven collection development, part 2. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 142-150.
81. Stowell Bracke, M., Hérubel, J. V. M., & Ward, S. M. (2010). Some thoughts on opportunities for collection development librarians. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 255-259.
82. Trueswell, R. L. (1969). Some behavioral patterns of library users: The 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43(5), 458-461.
83. Tyler, D. C., Xu, Y., Melvin, J. C., Epp, M., & Kreps, A. M. (2010). Just how right are the customers?: An analysis of the relative performance of patron-initiated interlibrary loan monograph purchases. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 162-179.
84. Ward, S. M. (2002). Books on demand: Just-in-time acquisitions. The Acquisitions Librarian, 14(27), 95-107.
85. Ward, S. M., Wray, T., & Debus-López, K. E. (2003). Collection development based on patron requests: Collaboration between interlibrary loan and acquisitions. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 27(2), 203-213.
86. Watson, P. D. (2004). Alternative acquisition routes. Library Technology Reports, 40(6), 59-67.
87. Way, D. (2009). The assessment of patron-initiated collection development via interlibrary loan at a comprehensive university. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & ElectronicReserve, 19(4), 299-308.
88. Wender, R. W. (1969). Analysis of loans in the behavioral sciences. Special Libraries, 60(8), 510-513.
89. Williams, B. W., & Hubbard, J. G. (1990). Collection management uses of an interlibrary loan database. The Best for the Patron: Proceedings of the Research Forum, Academic Library Section, Mountain Plains Library Association, Emporia, KS: Emporia State University. 31-49.
90. Williams, B. W., & Hubbard, J. G. (1991). Interlibrary loan and collection management applications of an ILL database management system. Journal of Interlibrary Loan & Document Supply, 1(3), 63-90.
91. Wilson, T. D. (1962). Follow-up on interlibrary loan analysis. Special Libraries, 53(8), 493-494.
92. Wood, D. N., & Bower, C. A. (1969). Survey of medical literature borrowed from the national lending library for science and technology. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 57(1), 47-63.
93. Zopfi-Jordan, D. (2008). Purchasing or borrowing: Making interlibrary loan decisions that enhance patron satisfaction. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 18(3), 387-394.