Tying collection development's loose ends with interlibrary loan

Collection Building

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 72-77

  Ruppel, Margie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collections management; Interlending; Libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746363825     PISSN: 01604953     EISSN: 20545592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01604950610677530     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen, M. (2003), “Patron-focused services in three US libraries: collaborative interlibrary loan, collection development and acquisitions”, Interlending & Document Supply, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 138-41.
2. Anderson, K., Freeman, R.S., Hérubel, J.-P.V.M., Mykytiuk, L.J., Nixon, J.M. and Ward, S.M. (2002), “Buy, don't borrow: bibliographers' analysis of academic library collection development through interlibrary loan requests”, Collection Management, Vol. 27 Nos 3/4, pp. 1-11.
3. Blackwell Book Services (2005), “US approval coverage and cost study 2003/2004”, available at: www.blackwell.com/downloads/CC0304.pdf (accessed 16 March 2006).
4. Council of National Library Associations (2003), Bowker Annual of Library and Book Trade Information, R.R. Bowker, New York, NY.
5. Fussler, H.H. and Simon, J.L. (1969), Patterns in the Use of Books in Large Research Libraries, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
6. Higginbotham, B.B. and Bowdoin, S. (1993), Access versus Assets: A Comprehensive Guide to Resource Sharing for Academic Librarians, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
7. Jackson, M.E. (2004a), Assessing ILL/DD Services: New Cost-effective Alternatives, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
8. Jackson, M.E. (2004b), “The future of interlending”, Interlending & Document Supply, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 88-93.
9. Livingston, D. (2004), “Using interlibrary loan data as a selection tool: ILL trails provide collection clues”, Against the Grain, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 22-8.
10. Parker, S. (1991), “What needs to change”, Wilson Library Bulletin, Vol. 65, p. 51.
11. Perdue, J. and Van Fleet, J.A. (1999), “Borrow or buy? Cost-effective delivery of monographs”, Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 19-28.
12. Roberts, M. and Cameron, K.J. (1984), “A barometer of ‘unmet demand’: interlibrary loans analysis and monographic acquisitions”, Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, Vol. 8, pp. 88-93.
13. Southern Illinois University Carbondale (2006), “Fast facts about SIUC”, available at: http://news.siu.edu/publications/Facts2006/index.pdf (accessed 16 March 2006).
14. Thornton, G.A. (1993), An Examination of the Relationship between Published Book Reviews and the Circulation of Books at an Academic Library, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
15. Ward, S. (2002), “Books on demand: just-in-time acquisitions”, The Acquisitions Librarian, Vol. 27 No. 27, pp. 95-107.
16. Ward, S. (2003), “Collection development based on patron requests: collaboration between interlibrary loan and acquisitions”, Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 203-13.