Integrating ecological, scenic and local identity values in the management plan of an Alpine Natural Park

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 833-850

  Zanon, Bruno ^a   Geneletti, Davide ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Landscape unit; Natura 2000; Nature conservation; Zoning

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GUIDELINE; LANDSCAPE PROTECTION; LOCAL PLANNING; NATURE CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREA; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; ZONING POLICY;

ITALY; PANEVEGGIO-PALE DI SAN MARTINO NATURE PARK; TRENTINO-ALTO ADIGE; TRENTO;

EID: 79959553253     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.537544     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Beunen, R., 2000. Nature management plans as a tool to facilitate decision making processes. Paper presented at the Aesop conference, Vienna. [online] Available from: http://content.dow.wur.nl/internet/webdocs/internet/lup/beunen/AESOP2005 .pdf check website [Accessed 10 March 2010].
2. Beunen, R., 2006. European nature conservation legislation and spatial planning: For better or for worse? Journal of environmental planning and management, 49 (4), 605-619.
3. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., et al., 2004. Sharing power. Learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. Tehran: IIED and IUCN/ CEESP/ CMWG, Cenesta.
4. Boteva, D., Griffiths, G., and Dimopoulos, P., 2004. Evaluation and mapping of the conservation significance of habitats using GIS: an example from Crete, Greece. Journal for nature conservation, 12, 237-250.
5. Brabyn, L., 2009. Classifying landscape character. Landscape research, 34 (3), 299-321.
6. Brown, J. and Mitchell, B., 2000. The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. The George Wright forum, 17 (1), 70-79.
7. Brown, J. and Mitchell, N., 2006. Partnerships and protected landscapes: new conservation strategies that engage communities. In: D. Harmon, ed., People, places, and parks: proceedings of the 2005 George Wright Society conference on parks, protected areas, and cultural sites. Hancock, MI: The George Wright Society, 89-98.
8. Brown, J., Mitchell, N., and Beresford, M., 2005. Protected landscapes: a conservation approach that links nature, culture and community. In: J. Brown, N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford, eds. The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, 3-18.
9. Brunetta, G. and Voghera, A., 2008. Evaluating landscape for shared values: tools, principles, and methods. Landscape research, 33 (1), 71-87.
10. Canova, S., 2006. Protected areas and landscape conservation in the Lombardy plain (northern Italy): an appraisal. Landscape and urban planning, 74, 102-109.
11. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 1998. Communication of the European Commission to the Council and to the Parliament on a European community biodiversity strategy. COM (98) 42. Brussels: CEC.
12. CEC, 1999. ESDP - European Spatial Development Perspective: towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
13. CEC, 2001. Communication from the Commission. A sustainable Europe for a better world: a European Union strategy for sustainable development. Brussels, 15 May 2001, COM(2001)264 final.
14. CEC, 2006. Communication from the Commission: halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 -and beyond. Sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being. Brussels, COM (2006)216 final.
15. CEC, 2008. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A midterm assessment of implementing the EC biodiversity action plan. Brussels, COM(2008) 864 final.
16. CEU (Council of the European Union), 2006. Review of the EU sustainable development strategy (EU SDS) - renewed strategy. Brussels, 26 June.
17. Chemini, C. and Rizzoli, A., 2003. Land use change and biodiversity conservation in the Alps. Journal of mountain ecology, 7 (Suppl.), 1-7.
18. Collinge, S.K., 1996. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and urban planning, 36, 59-77.
19. Council of Europe, 1996. Pan-European biological and landscape diversity strategy. Nature and environment, 74. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.
20. st century. Landscape and urban planning, 54, 267-281.
21. de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., and Boumans, R.M.J., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 41, 393-408.
22. Deéjeant-Pons, M., 2006. The European landscape convention. Landscape research, 31 (4), 363-384.
23. EC, 2002. European Community, Decision No. 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme.
24. EC, 2003. Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. European Commission, DG Environment. Nature and Biodiversity.
25. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2006. Progress towards halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010, Report No 5/2006. Copenhagen: EEA.
26. EEC (Council of the European Communities), 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Official Journal of the European Communities, L206.
27. EEC, 1993. Council Decision of 25 October 1993 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 93/626/EEC.
28. Ente Parco Colli Euganei, 1994. Parco regionale dei Colli Euganei: piano ambientale. Coord. R. Gambino.
29. Fahrig, L., 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 34, 487-515.
30. Farina, A., 2004. Lezioni di ecologia. Torino: UTET Libreria. Finke, L., 1993. Introduzione all'ecologia del paesaggio. Milan: Angeli.
31. Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M., 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.
32. Gambino, R., 1995. Separare quando necessario, integrare ovunque possibile. Urbanistica, 104, 57-64.
33. Gambino, R., 1996. Progetti per l'ambiente. Milan: Angeli.
34. Gambino, R., 1997. Conservare innovare. Paesaggio, ambiente, territorio. Torino: Utet Libreria.
35. Gambino, R., 2000. Parks for the future: a European perspective. The George Wright Forum, 17 (2), 52-28.
36. Gambino, R., 2008. Conclusioni, workshop Federparchi, CED PPN, AIAP, Classificare per innovare la gestione delle aree protette. Un contributo italiano al processo di classificazione, Torino, 19-20 maggio. [online] Available from: http://www.aidap.it/pdf/relatori/gambino-CED-PPN.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2011].
37. Gambino, R., Talamo, D., and Thomasset, F., 2008. Parchi d'Europa. Verso una politica europea per le aree protette. Pisa: ETS. Abridged version: Parks for Europe. Towards a European policy for protected areas. Pisa: ETS.
38. Geneletti, D. and van Duren, I., 2008. Protected area zoning for conservation and use: a GISbased integration of multicriteria and multiobjective analysis. Landscape and urban planning, 85, 97-110.
39. Hamilton, K. and Selman, P., 2005. The 'landscape scale' in planning: recent experience of bio-geographic planning units in Britain. Landscape research, 30 (4), 549-558.
40. Heinen, J.T. and Shrestha, S.K., 2006. Evolving policies for conservation: an historical profile of the protected area system of Nepal. Journal of environmental planning and management, 49 (6), 798-812.
41. Hjortsø C.N., Stræde, S., and Helles, F., 2006. Applying multi criteria decision making to protected areas and buffer zone management. Journal of forest economics, 12 (2), 91-108.
42. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources), 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: CNPPA with the assistance of WCMC, IUCN.
43. IUCN, 2005. Benefits beyond boundaries. Proceedings of the Vth IUCN World Park Congress. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
44. IUCN, 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland Switzerland: IUCN.
45. James, P. and Gittins, J.W., 2007. Local landscape character assessment: an evaluation of community-led schemes in Cheshire. Landscape research, 32 (4), 423-442.
46. Jones, M., 2007. The European landscape convention and the question of public participation. Landscape research, 32 (5), 613-633.
47. Jongman, R., 2004. The context and concept of ecological networks. In: R.H.G. Jongman and G. Pungetti, eds. Ecological networks and greenways. Concepts, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, 7-33.
48. Jongman, R.H.G., Kuülvik, M., and Kristiansen, I., 2004. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and urban planning, 68, 305-319.
49. Krause, C.L., 2001. Our visual landscape. Managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects. Landscape and urban planning, 54, 239-254.
50. Kundrata, M. and Hušková, B., 2005. Sustaining rural landscapes and building civil society: experience from Central Europe. In: J. Brown, N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford, eds. The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN, 131-146.
51. Lange, E., 2008. Our shared landscape: design, planning and management of multifunctional landscapes. Journal of environmental management, 89, 143-145.
52. Lin, F.T., 2000. GIS-based information flow in a land-use zoning review process. Landscape and urban planning, 52, 21-32.
53. Machlis, G.E., 1995. Social science and protected area management: the principles of partnership. In: J.A. McNeely, ed. Partnership for conservation: an introduction. Washington DC: Island Press, 45-57.
54. Malahide, 2004. Final message from Malahide. Halting the decline of biodiversity - priority objectives and targets for 2010, stakeholders' conference. Biodiversity and the EU - Sustaining life, sustaining livelihoods. Malahide, Ireland, 25-27 May.
55. Marisaldi, L., et al., 1997. Un mondo di acque rocce e foreste: il Parco Naturale di Paneveggio-Pale di San Martino. Firenze: Giunti.
56. Mulongoy, K.J. and Chape, S., 2004. Protected areas and biodiversity. An overview of key issues, UNEP-WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 21.
57. Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A.S., 1984. Landscape ecology. Theory and application. New York: Springer-Verlag.
58. Nohl, W., 2001. Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception - preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and urban planning, 54, 223-237.
59. Noss, R.F. and Cooperrider, A.Y., 1994. Saving nature's legacy. Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Washington DC: Island Press.
60. Ode, Å., Tveit, M.S., and Fry, G., 2008. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape research, 33 (1), 89-117.
61. Olwig, K.R., 2007. The practice of landscape 'conventions' and the just landscape: the case of the European landscape convention. Landscape research, 32 (5), 579-594.
62. Phillips, A., 2002. Management guidelines for IUCN Category V protected areas - protected landscapes/seascapes. Cambridge and Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
63. Phillips, A., 2003. Turning ideas on their head. The new paradigm for protected areas. The George Wright Forum, 20 (2), 8-32.
64. Phillips, A., 2005. Landscape as a meeting ground: Category V protected landscapes/seascapes and World Heritage cultural landscapes. In: J. Brown, N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford, eds. The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN, 19-35.
65. Raymond, C. and Brown, G., 2006. A method for assessing protected area allocation using a typology of landscape values. Journal of environmental planning and management, 49 (1), 41-58.
66. Rössler, M., 2005. World Heritage Cultural Landscapes: a global perspective. In: J. Brown, N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford, eds. The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN, 37-46.
67. Sabatini, M.C., et al., 2006. A quantitative method for zoning of protected areas and its spatial ecological implications. Journal of environmental management, 83 (2), 198-206.
68. Selman, P. and Knight, M., 2006. On the nature of virtuous change in cultural landscapes: exploring sustainability through qualitative models. Landscape research, 31 (3), 295-307.
69. Swanwick, C., 2002. Landscape character assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. The Countryside Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage.
70. Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P., and van der Brink, A., 2007. Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landscape and urban planning, 79, 374-384.
71. Thomas, L. and Middleton, J., 2003. Guidelines for management planning of protected areas. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
72. Tveit, M., Ode, Å., and Fry, G., 2006. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape research, 31 (3), 229-255.
73. United Nations, 1992. Convention on biological diversity. [online] Available from: http:// www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf [Accessed 10 March 2011].
74. Unnerstall, H., 2006. 'Sustainable development' as a criterion for the interpretation of Article 6 of the Habitats Directive. European environment, 16, 73-88.
75. Velázquez, A. and Bocco, G., 2001. Land unit for biodiversity mapping. In: D. Zee and I.S. van der, Zonneveld, eds. Landscape ecology applied in land evaluation, development and conservation. Some worldwide selected examples. Enschede: ITC publication 81, IALE publication MM-1, 273-285.
76. West, P. and Brockington, D., 2006. An anthropological perspective on some unexpected consequences of protected areas. Conservation biology, 20 (3), 609-616.
77. Wilson, E. and Piper, J., 2008. Spatial planning for biodiversity in Europe's changing climate. European environment, 18, 135-151.
78. Zachrisson, A., 2008. Who should manage protected areas in the Swedish mountain region? A survey approach to co-management. Journal of environmental management, 87, 154-164.
79. Zachrisson, A., et al., 2006. Tourism and protected areas: motives, actors and processes. International journal of biodiversity science and management, 2 (4), 350-358.
80. Zanon, B., ed., 2004. Documento metodologico e programmatico per la revisione del piano del parco. Trento: Universitàdegli Studi di Trento - Parco Paneveggio-Pale di S. Martino.
81. Zanon, B., ed., 2006. Percorso di revisione del Piano del Parco. Università degli Studi di Trento. Trento: Parco Paneveggio-Pale di S. Martino.
82. Zanon, B. and Franceschini, A., 2009. Leggere il paesaggio, pianificare con lo sguardo. In: Il progetto dell'urbanistica per il paesaggio, proceedings XII Conferenza Nazionale Società Italiana degli Urbanisti. Bari, 19-20 febbraio 2009, Mario Adda Editore, Bari.
83. Zanon, B., Geneletti, D., and Franceschini, A., 2007. L'integrazione dei valori antropici, visuali e ambientali nella zonizzazione dei parchi naturali. Agribusiness, paesaggio & ambiente, X (2), 126-137.
84. Zonneveld, I.S., 1989. The land unit - a fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications. Landscape ecology, 3, 67-86.
85. Zonneveld, I.S., 1995. Land ecology. An introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation, land management and conservation. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.