Who should manage protected areas in the Swedish mountain region? A survey approach to co-management

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 154-164

  Zachrisson, Anna ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Co management; Protected areas; Swedish mountain region

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CASE-STUDIES; CO-MANAGEMENT; COMMON POOL RESOURCES; ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; MULTILEVELS; PROTECTED AREAS; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; SWEDISH MOUNTAIN REGION; SWEDISHS;

ECONOMICS;

COMANAGEMENT; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; MOUNTAIN REGION; NATIONAL PLANNING; PROTECTED AREA; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; LAND BIOME; MALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SWEDEN; URBAN RURAL DIFFERENCE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

RANGIFER TARANDUS;

EID: 38549153317     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anttila, S., 1999. The Snowmobile Issue as a Commons Dilemma. Rapport 1999:2, Fjällforskningsinstitutet, Östersund.
2. Baland J.-M., and Platteau J.-P. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is there a Role for Rural Communities? (1996), Clarendon Press, Oxford, NY
3. Bardhan P., and Dayton-Johnson J. Unequal irrigators: heterogeneity and commons management in large-scale multivariate research. In: Ostrom E., et al. (Ed). The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academies Press, Washington, DC 87-112
4. In: Berkes F. (Ed). Common Property Resources. Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development (1989), Belhaven Press, London
5. Berkes F. Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. In: Ostrom E., et al. (Ed). The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
6. In: Berkes F., and Folke C. (Eds). Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Berkes F., George P., and Preston R.J. Co-management: the evolution in theory and practice of the joint administration of living resources. Alternatives 18 2 (1991) 12-18
8. In: Brandon K., Redford K.H., and Sanderson S.E. (Eds). Parks in Peril (1998), The Nature Conservancy Island Press, Washington, DC
9. In: Brechin S.R., Wilshusen P.R., Fortwangler C.L., and West P.C. (Eds). Contested Nature (2003), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
10. In: Bromley D.W. (Ed). Making the Commons Work. Theory, Practice, and Policy (1992), Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Fransisco
11. Buttolph-Johnson J. Political Science Research Methods (2005), CQ Press, Washington, DC
12. Campbell T. Co-management of aboriginal resources. Information North 22 1 (1996)
13. Carlsson L. Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal 28 3 (2000) 502-520
14. Carrus G., Bonaiuto M., and Bonnes M. Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy. Environmental Behaviour 37 2 (2005) 237-257
15. Dietz T., Dolšak N., Ostrom E., and Stern P.C. Introduction: the drama of the commons. In: Ostrom E., et al. (Ed). The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 3-35
16. In: Dolšak N., and Ostrom E. (Eds). The Commons in a New Millennium (2003), MIT Press, London
17. Edwards V., and Steins N.A. Special issue introduction: the importance of context in common pool resource research. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 1 (1999) 195-204
18. Ericsson, G. et al., 2005. Delrapport om jakt och fiske-omfattning, betydelse och förvaltning. FjällMistrarapport 14, The Mountain Mistra Programme, Umeå.
19. Folke C. The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development. Conservation Biology 20 3 (2006) 686-688
20. Ghimere K., and Pimbert M.P. Social Change and Conservation (1997), Earthscan Publications Limited and UNRISD, London
21. In: Gibson C.C., McKean M.A., and Ostrom E. (Eds). People and Forests. Communities, Institutions, and Governance (2000), MIT Press, London
22. Gordon S.H. The economic theory of a common-property resource. Journal of Political Economy 62 (1954) 124-142
23. Gorenflo L.J., and Brandon K. Key human dimensions of gaps in global biodiversity conservation. BioScience 56 9 (2006) 723-731
24. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (1968) 1243-1247
25. Heberlein T.A., and Ericsson G. Ties to the countryside: accounting for urbanites attitudes toward hunting, wolves, and wildlife. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10 3 (2005) 1-23
26. Imperial M.T. Institutional analysis and eco-system-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management 24 4 (1999) 449-465
27. In: Jentoft S. (Ed). Commons in a Cold Climate (1998), UNESCO and Parthenon Publishing, Paris, NY
28. Jentoft S. Co-management-the way forward. In: Wilson D.C., Nielsen J.R., and Degnbol P. (Eds). The Fisheries Co-management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects. Fish and Fisheries Series (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1-14
29. Jentoft S., and McCay B.J. The place of civil society in fisheries management. In: Wilson D.C., Nielsen J.R., and Degnbol P. (Eds). The Fisheries Co-management Experience. Fish and Fisheries Series (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 293-307
30. Lam W.F. Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action (1998), ICS Press, San Fransisco, CA
31. In: McCay B.J., and Acheson J.M. (Eds). The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources (1987), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, USA
32. Mulder M.B., and Coppolillo P. Conservation (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton
33. Naturvårdsverket, 2006a. Skyddad natur. 〈http://www.naturvardsverket.se/index.php3?main=/dokument/natur/naturres/reservat.html〉, 17/10/2006.
34. Naturvårdsverket, 2006b. Natur och naturvård. 〈http://www.naturvardsverket.se/index.php3?main=/dokument/natur/naturres/reservat.html〉, 17/10/2006.
35. Naturvårdsverket, 2006c. Right of Public Access. 〈http://www.allemansratten.se/templates/Page.asp?id=2060〉, 17/10/2006.
36. Nepal S.K., and Weber K.E. Managing resources and resolving conflicts: national parks and local people. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 2 (1995) 11-25
37. Oakerson R. Analyzing the commons: a framework. In: Bromley D.W. (Ed). Making the Commons Work. Theory, Practice, and Policy (1992), The Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Fransisco
38. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons (1990), Cambridge University Press, New York
39. Ostrom E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review 92 1 (1998) 1-22
40. Ostrom E. Reformulating the commons. Swiss Political Science 6 1 (2000) 29-52
41. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford
42. In: Ostrom E., et al. (Ed). The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
43. Ostrom E., Gardner R., and Walker J. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources (1994), The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI
44. Pampel F.C. Logistic Regression: A Primer. Sage Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, 132 (2001), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
45. In: Pinkerton E. (Ed). Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development (1989), University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver
46. Rådelius, C., 2002. Självstyre eller samförvaltning? Problem och möjligheter utifrån en studie av världsarvet Laponia. Licentiate Thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå.
47. Rothstein B. Sociala fällor och tillitens problem (2003), SNS Förlag, Kristianstad
48. Rudd M.A. An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecological Economics 48 (2004) 109-124
49. SCB, 2006. Skyddad natur 31 dec 2004. Sveriges officiella statistik, Statistiska meddelanden MI 41SM 0501. 〈http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI0603/2004A02/MI0603_2004A02_SM_MI41SM0501.pdf〉, 07/11/2006.
50. Skogen K., and Krange O. A wolf at the gate: the anti-carnivore alliance and the symbolic construction of community. Sociologia Ruralis 43 3 (2003) 309-325
51. Skr 2001/02:173. En samlad naturvårdspolitik. Miljö- och samhällsbyggnadsdepartementet.
52. In: Stevens S. (Ed). Conservation through Cultural Survival. Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas (1997), Island Press, Washington, DC
53. Stoll-Kleeman S. Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (2001) 369-385
54. Svarstad, H., 2003. Rovviltkonflikter i noen europeiske land. NINA Fagrapport 68, NINA, Trondheim.
55. Wade R. Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India (1988), ICS Press, San Fransisco
56. Wilson M.A. The wolf in yellowstone: science, symbol or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use. Society & Natural Resources 10 5 (1997) 453-468