Scenario study on regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance in China

Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 680-685

  Wang, Jinnan ^a   Cai, Bofeng ^a   Cao, Dong ^a   Zhou, Ying ^a   Liu, Lancui ^a  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING   (China)

Author keywords

Allocation principles; CO2 emissions; Indicators; Regional burden differentiation model

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EQUITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GIS; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

CHINA;

EID: 79959533210     PISSN: 02532468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S. 2008. The right to development in a climate constrained world[R]. Berlin: Stockholm Environment Institute. 5-20.
2. Baumert K A, Bhandari R, KETE N. 1999. What might a developing country climate commitment look like?[R]. Washington: WRI. 1-20.
3. Den Elzen M, Hohne N, Moltmann S. 2008. The Triptych approach revisited: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation[J]. Energy Policy, 36(3): 1107-1124.
4. Den Elzen M, Lucas P, Vuuren D. 2005. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes[J]. Energy Policy, 33(16): 2138-2151.
5. Ding Z L, Duan X N, Ge Q S, et al. 2009. On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and some related issues[J]. Sci China Earth Sci, 39(12): 1659-1671(in Chinese).
6. Ekholm T, Soimakallio S, Moltmann S, et al.. 2009. Effort sharing in ambitious, global climate change mitigation scenarios[J]. Energy Policy, 38: 1797-1810.
7. Groenenberg H, Phylipsen D, Blok K. 2001. Differentiating commitments world wide: global differentiation of GHG emissions reductions based on the Triptych approach-a preliminary assessment[J]. Energy Policy, 29(12): 1007-1030.
8. Grubb M. 1989. The greenhouse effect: negotiating targets[R]. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs. 7-34.
9. Grubler A, Nakic'enovi C N. 1994. International burden sharing in greenhouse gas reduction(IIASA)[R]. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. 1-99.
10. IEA. 2009. World energy outlook 2009[R]. Paris: IEA. 112-250.
11. Phylipsen G, Bode J, Blok K, et al.. 1998. A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubble[J]. Energy Policy, 26(12): 929-943.
12. Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A. 2002. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy[J]. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2(1): 1-22.
13. Torvanger A, Ringius L. 2002. Criteria for evaluation of burden-sharing rules in international climate policy[J]. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2(3): 221-235.
14. Wang J N, Cai B F, Yan G, et al. 2010. Study on carbon dioxide total emission control in the context of emission intensity commitment[J]. China Environmental Science, 30(11): 1009-1014(in Chinese).