Selection of potential enterococcus faecium isolated from Thai native chicken for probiotic use according to the in vitro properties

Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 9-14

  Lertworapreecha, Napaporn ^a   Poonsuk, Kriengsak ^b   Chalermchiakit, Thongchai ^a  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Enterococcus faecium; Native chicken; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959507518     PISSN: 01253395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Agus, W. 2003. Investigation into the influence of a bacteriocin- producing Enterococcus strain on the intestinal microflora. Thesis, Graduate School, Karlsruhe University, Germany.
2. Bellomo, G., Mangiagle, A., Nicastto, L. and Frigerio, O. 1980. A controlled double blind study of Enterococcus faecium SF68 strain as a new biological preparation for the treatment of diarrhea in pediatrics. Current Therapeutic Research. 70, 1717-1720.
3. CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). 2007. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Seventeenth Informational Supplement. Document M100-S17. 27(1), 52-55.
4. De, S., Van, H.L., Vande, W.M., Christiaens, H. and Verstracte, W. 1995. Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of Lactobacilli. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 78, 292-301.
5. Ehrmann, M.A., Kurzak, P., Bauer, J., and Vogel, R.F. 2002. Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 92, 966-975.
6. Ezaki, T., Hashimoto, Y. and Yabuuchi, E. 1989. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 39, 224-229.
7. Franz, C., Holzapfel, W.H. and Stiles, M.E. 1999. Enterococci at the crossroads of food safety? International Journal of Food Microbiology. 47, 1-24.
8. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 66, 365-378.
9. Jin L.Z., Marquardt, R.R. and Zhao, X. 2000. A strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) inhibits adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to porcine small intestine mucus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 66, 4200-4204.
10. Kariyama, R., Mitsuhata, R., Chow, J.W., Clewell, D.B. and Kumon, H. 2000. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for surveillance isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 38 (8), 3092-5.
11. Ketkaew, W., Assavanig, A. and Boonkumklao, P. 2005. Production of bacteriocin by Enterococcus faecium HF84 from human gastro-intestinal tract. Proceedings of the 31st Congress on Science and Technology of Thailand, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, October 18 -20, 2005, 1-3.
12. Kobayashi, H., Suzuki, T., and Unemoto, Y. 1986. Streptococcal cytoplasmic pH is regulated by changes in amount and activity of a proton-translocating ATPase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 261, 627-630.
13. Laukava, A., Guba, P., Nemcova, R. and Vaslikova, Z. 2003. Reduction of Salmonella in gnotobiotic Japanese quails caused by the enterocin A-producing EK 13 strain of Enterococcus faecium. Veterinary Research Communications. 27, 275-280.
14. Lorca, G.L. and Valdez, G.F. 2001. A Low-pH-Inducible, Stationary- Phase Acid Tolerance Response in Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL 639. Current Microbiology. 42, 21-25
15. Rinkinen, M., Jalava, K., Westermarck, E., Salminen, S. and Ouwehand, A.C. 2003. Interaction between probiotic lactic acid bacteria and canine enteric pathogens: a risk factor for intestinal Enterococcus faecium colonization? Veterinary Microbiology. 92, 111-119.
16. Saarela, M., Mogensen, G., Fondén, R., Mättö, J. and Mattila-Sandholm, T. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. Journal of Biotechnology, 84, 197-215,
17. Schillinger, U. and Lücke, F.K. 1989. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 55, 1901-1906.
18. Strompfova, V. and Laukova, A. 2007. In vitro study on bacteriocin production of Enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe. 13, 228-237
19. Strompfova, V., Laukova, A., and Ouwehand, A. C. 2004. Selection of enterococci for potential canine probiotic additives. Veterinary Microbiology. 100, 107-114.
20. Sturkie, P.D. 1976. Avian Physiology. Springer-Verlag New York, New York. pp 1-400.
21. Tanaka, H., Hashiba, H., Kok, J. and Mierau, I. 2000. Bile salt hydrolase of Bifidobacterium longum: biochemical and genetic characterization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 66, 2502-2512.
22. Tanasupawat, S., Ezaki, T., Suzuki, K., Okada, S., Komagata, K. and Kozaki, M. 1992a Characterization and identification of Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus plantarum strains from fermented foods in Thailand. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 38, 121-134.
23. Wunderlich, P.F., Braun, L., Fumagalli, I., D'Apuzzo, V., Heim, F., Karly, M., Lodi, R., Politta, G., Vonbank, F. and Zeltner, L. 1989. Double-blind report on the efficacy of lactic acid-producing Enterococcus SF68 in the prevention of antimicrobial-associated diarrhea and in the treatment of acute diarrhea. Journal of International Medical Research. 17, 333-338