Language evolution and human history: What a difference a date makes

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 366, Issue 1567, 2011, Pages 1090-1100

  Gray, Russell D ^a   Atkinson, Quentin D ^a   Greenhill, Simon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Austronesian; Cultural evolution; Glottochronology; Indo European; Linguistics

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; CHRONOLOGY; CULTURAL CHANGE; CULTURAL HISTORY; HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY; LANGUAGE; PHYLOGENETICS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

ASIA; EUROPE; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN;

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; REVIEW; TIME;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CULTURAL EVOLUTION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79959500285     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0378     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. 1965 Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol. 8, 357-366. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(65)90083-4)
2. Evans, N. 2010 Dying words: endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3. Durie, M. & Ross, M. 1996 The comparative method reviewed: regularity and irregularity in language change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Campbell, L. & Poser, W. J. 2008 Language classification: history and method. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Kirch, P. V. & Green, R. C. 2001 Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia. An essay in historical anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Renfrew, C. 2002 The 'emerging synthesis': the archaeogenetics of farming/language dispersals and other spread zones. In Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis (eds P. Bellwood & C. Renfrew). Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
7. Renfrew, C. 2010 Archaeogenetics: towards a 'new synthesis'? Curr. Biol. 20, R162-R165. (doi:10.1016/j.cub. 2009.11.056)
8. Ho, S. Y. W. & Larson, G. 2006 Molecular clocks: when times are α-changin'. Trends Genet. 22, 79-83. (doi:10. 1016/j.tig.2005.11.006)
9. McMahon, A. & McMahon, R. 2006 Why linguists don't do dates: evidence from Indo-European and Australian languages. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 153-160. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
10. Swadesh, M. 1952 Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 96, 452-463.
11. Swadesh, M. 1955 Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 21, 121-137. (doi:10. 1086/464321)
12. Bergsland, K. & Vogt, H. 1962 On the validity of glottochronology. Curr. Anthropol. 3, 115-153. (doi:10.1086/ 200264)
13. Blust, R. 2000 Why lexicostatistics doesn't work: the 'universal constant' hypothesis and the Austronesian languages. In Time depth in historical linguistics (eds C. Renfrew, A. McMahon & L. Trask), pp. 311-332. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
14. Pagel, M. 1999 Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877-884. (doi:10.1038/ 44766)
15. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J. P. 2001 Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 2310-2314. (doi:10.1126/science.1065889)
16. Greenhill, S. J., Blust, R. & Gray, R. D. 2008 The Austronesian Basic Vocabulary Database: from bioinformatics to lexomics. Evol. Bioinformatics 4, 271-283.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1995 Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44, 17-48.
18. Sanderson, M. 2002 R8s, analysis of rates of evolution, version 1.50. See http://ginger.ucdavis.edu/r8s/.
19. Sanderson, M. 2002 Estimating absolute rates of evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 101-109.
20. Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J. & Rambaut, A. 2006 Relaxed phylogenies and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4, e88. 699-710. (doi:10.1371/ journal.pbio.0040088)
21. Diamond, J. & Bellwood, P. 2003 Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science 300, 597-603. (doi:10.1126/science.1078208)
22. Mallory, J. P. 1989 In search of the Indo Europeans: language, archaeology and myth. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.
23. Gimbutas, M. 1973 Old Europe c. 7000-3500 BC, the earliest European cultures before the infiltration of the Indo-European peoples. J. Indo-Eur. Stud. 1, 1-20.
24. Gimbutas, M. 1973 The beginning of the Bronze Age in Europe and the Indo-Europeans 3500-2500 BC. J. Indo-Eur. Stud. 1, 163-214.
25. Trask, L. 1996 Historical linguistics. New York, NY: Arnold.
26. Renfrew, C. 1987 Archaeology and language: the puzzle of Indo-European origins. London, UK: Cape.
27. Gkiasta, M., Russell, T., Shennan, S. & Steele, J. 2003 Neolithic transition in Europe: the radiocarbon record revisited. Antiquity 77, 45-62.
28. Atkinson, Q. & Gray, R. D. 2005 Curious parallels and curious connections: phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Syst. Biol. 54, 513-526. (doi:10.1080/10635150590950317)
29. Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B. & Black, P. 1997 FILE IEDATA1. See http://www.ntu.edu.au/education/langs/ ielex/IE-DATA1.
30. Embleton, S. 1986 Statistics in historical linguistics. Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer.
31. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001 MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754)
32. Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. 2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426, 435-439. (doi:10.1038/ nature02029)
33. Atkinson, Q. D. & Gray, R. D. 2006 How old is the Indo-European language family? Progress or more moths to the flame? In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 91-109. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
34. Balter, M. 2003 Early date for the birth of Indo-European languages. Science 302, 1490-1491. (doi:10. 1126/science.302.5650.1490a)
35. Johnson, K. 2008 Quantitative methods in linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
36. Campbell, L. 2004 Historical linguistics: an introduction, 2nd edn. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
37. Nicholls, G.K. & Gray, R.D. 2006 Quantifying uncertainty in a stochastic Dollo model of vocabulary evolution. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 161-171. Cambridge, UK:McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
38. Ringe, D., Warnow, T. & Taylor, A. 2002 Indo-European and computational cladistics. Trans. Phil. Soc. B 100, 59-129. (doi:10.1111/1467-968X.00091)
39. Atkinson, Q., Nicholls, G. & Gray, R. D. 2005 From words to dates: water into wine, mathemagic or phylogenetic inference? Trans. Phil. Soc. 103, 193-219. (doi:10. 1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00151.x)
40. Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. 2007 BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-214)
41. Evans, S. N., Ringe, D. & Warnow, T. 2006 Inference of divergence times as a statistical inverse problem. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 119-129. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
42. Kitchen, A., Ehret, C., Assefa, S. & Mulligan, C. J. 2009 Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2703-2710. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2009.0408)
43. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. 2006 Estimating rates of lexical replacement on phylogenetic trees of languages. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 173-182. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
44. Garrett, A. 2006 Convergence in the formation of Indo-European subgroups: phylogeny and chronology. In Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages (eds P. Forster & C. Renfrew), pp. 139-152. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
45. Greenhill, S. J., Currie, T. E. & Gray, R. D. 2009 Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies? Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2299-2306. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2008.1944)
46. Nicholls, G. K. & Gray, R. D. 2008 Dated ancestral trees from binary trait data and its application to the diversification of languages. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 70, 545-566. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00648.x)
47. Blust, R. 1999 Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (eds E. Zeitoun & P. J. K. Li), pp. 31-94. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.
48. Pawley, A. 2002 The Austronesian dispersal: languages, technologies and people. In Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis (eds P. Bellwood & C. Renfrew), pp. 251-274. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
49. Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J. & Greenhill, S. J. 2009 Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323, 479-483. (doi:10.1126/science.1166858)
50. Spriggs, M. 2010 'I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now': why the dates keep changing for the spread of Austronesian languages. In A journey through Austronesian and Papuan linguistic and cultural space: papers in honour of Andrew K. Pawley (eds J. Bowden, N. Himmelmann & M. Ross), pp. 113-140. Canberra, Australia: Pacific Linguistics.
51. Oppenheimer, S. & Richards, M. 2001 Fast trains, slow boats and the ancestry of the Polynesian islanders. Sci. Prog. 84, 157-181. (doi:10.3184/00368500178 3238989)
52. Hill, C. et al. 2007 A mitochondrial stratigraphy for island southeast Asia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 29-43. (doi:10.1086/510412)
53. Soares, P. et al. 2008 Climate change and postglacial human dispersals in southeast Asia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1209-1218. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msn068)
54. Richards, M., Oppenheimer, S. & Sykes, B. 1998 mtDNA suggests Polynesian origins in eastern Indonesia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 1234-1236. (doi:10. 1086/302043)
55. Pawley, A. 1999 Chasing rainbows: implications of the rapid dispersal of Austronesian languages for subgrouping and reconstruction. In Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, vol. 1 (eds E. Zeitoun & P. J. K. Li), pp. 95-138. Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.
56. Ross, M. 1996 Contact-induced change and the comparative method: cases from Papua New Guinea. In The comparative method reviewed: regularity and irregularity in language change (eds M. Durie & M. D. Ross), pp. 180-217. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57. Nettle, D. 1999 Is the rate of linguistic change constant? Lingua 108, 119-136. (doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(98) 00047-3)
58. Thurgood, G. 1999 From ancient Cham to modern dialects: two thousand years of language contact and change. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
59. Greenhill, S. J., Drummond, A. J. & Gray, R. D. 2010 How accurate and robust are the phylogenetic estimates of Austronesian language relationships? PLoS ONE 5, e9573. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009573)
60. Irwin, G. 1998 The colonization of the Pacific: chronological, navigational and social issues. J. Polynesian Soc. 107, 111-144.
61. Blust, R. 2008 Remote Melanesia: one history or two? An addendum to Donohue and Denham. Oceanic Linguist. 47, 445-459. (doi:10.1353/ol.0.0012)
62. Fracchia, J. & Lewontin, R. C. 2005 The price ofmetaphor. History Theory 44, 14-29. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303. 2005.00305.x)
63. Gray, R. D., Greenhill, S. J. & Ross, R. M. 2007 The pleasures and perils of Darwinzing culture (with phylogenies). Biol. Theory 2, 360-375. (doi:10.1162/ biot.2007.2.4.360)