Advanced maturation by electrical stimulation: Differences in response between C2C12 and primary muscle progenitor cells

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 529-539

  Langelaan, Marloes L P ^a   Boonen, Kristel J M ^a   Rosaria Chak, Kang Yuen ^a   van der Schaft, Daisy W J ^a   Post, Mark J ^a   Baaijens, Frank P T ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biophysical stimulation; Cell line vs. primary cell source; Maturation; Muscle progenitor cells; Sarcomere assembly; Skeletal muscle tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

CELL ENGINEERING; CELLS; MUSCLE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOPHYSICAL STIMULATION; CELL LINE VS.; CELL LINES; CELL SOURCES; MATURATION; MUSCLE PROGENITOR CELLS; MUSCLE TISSUES; PRIMARY CELL SOURCE; PRIMARY CELLS; SARCOMERE ASSEMBLY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SKELETAL MUSCLE TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

CELL CULTURE;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; MATRIGEL; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; CELL MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HYDROGEL; IN VITRO STUDY; MONOLAYER CULTURE; MOUSE; MUSCLE TISSUE; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SARCOMERE; STEM CELL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 79959492541     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.345     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bach AD, Beier JP, Stern-Staeter J, et al. 2004; Skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med 8(4): 413-422.
2. Bayol S, Brownson C, Loughna PT. 2005; Electrical stimulation modulates IGF binding protein transcript levels in C2C12 myotubes. Cell Biochem Funct 23(5): 361-365.
3. Bian W, Bursac N. 2008; Cellular/tissue engineering. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 27(5): 109-113.
4. Boldrin L, Malerba A, Vitiello L, et al. 2008; Efficient delivery of human single fiber-derived muscle precursor cells via biocompatible scaffold. Cell Transpl 17(5): 577-584.
5. Boonen KJ, Post MJ. 2008; The muscle stem cell niche; regulation of satellite cells during regeration. Tissue Eng B Rev 14(4): 419-431.
6. Boonen KJ, Rosaria-Chak KY, Baaijens FP, et al. 2009; Essential environmental cues from the satellite cell niche: optimizing proliferation and differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296(6): C1338-1345.
7. Boonen KJM, Langelaan MLP, Polak RB, et al. 2010; Effects of a combined mechanical stimulation protocol: value for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J Biomech (in press).
8. Boontheekul T, Hill EE, Kong HJ, et al. 2007; Regulating myoblast phenotype through controlled gel stiffness and degradation. Tissue Eng 13(7): 1431-1442.
9. Brady MA, Lewis MP, Mudera V. 2008; Synergy between myogenic and non-myogenic cells in a 3D tissue-engineered craniofacial skeletal muscle construct. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2(7): 408-417.
10. Collins CA, Olsen I, Zammit PS, et al. 2005; Stem cell function, self-renewal, and behavioral heterogeneity of cells from the adult muscle satellite cell niche. Cell 122(2): 289-301.
11. Dennis RG, Kosnik PE, Gilbert ME, et al. 2001; Excitability and contractility of skeletal muscle engineered from primary cultures and cell lines. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280(2): C288-295.
12. Donnelly K, Khodabukus A, Philp A, et al. 2010; A novel bioreactor for stimulating skeletal muscle in vitro. Tissue Eng C Methods 16(4): 711-718.
13. Dusterhoft S, Pette D. 1990; Effects of electrically induced contractile activity on cultured embryonic chick breast muscle cells. Differentiation 44(3): 178-184.
14. Edelman PD, McFarland DC, Mironov VA, et al. 2005; Commentary: in vitro-cultured meat production. Tissue Eng 11(5-6): 659-662.
15. Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, et al. 2004; Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 166(6): 877-887.
16. Fujita H, Nedachi T, Kanzaki M. 2007; Accelerated de novo sarcomere assembly by electric pulse stimulation in C2C12 myotubes. Exp Cell Res 313(9): 1853-1865.
17. Gawlitta D, Boonen KJ, Oomens CW, et al. 2008; The influence of serum-free culture conditions on skeletal muscle differentiation in a tissue-engineered model. Tissue Eng A 14(1): 161-71.
18. Grossi A, Yadav K, Lawson MA. 2007; Mechanical stimulation increases proliferation, differentiation and protein expression in culture: stimulation effects are substrate dependent. J Biomech 40(15): 3354-3362.
19. Langelaan MLP, Boonen KJM, Polak RB, et al. 2010; Meet the new meat: tissue engineered skeletal muscle. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(2): 59-66.
20. Legerlotz K, Smith HK. 2008; Role of MyoD in denervated, disused, and exercised muscle. Muscle Nerve 38(3): 1087-1100.
21. Machida S, Spangenburg EE, Booth FW. 2004; Primary rat muscle progenitor cells have decreased proliferation and myotube formation during passages. Cell Proliferation 37(4): 267-277.
22. Maley MAL, Davies MJ, Grounds MD. 1995; Extracellular matrix, growth factors, genetics: their influence on cell proliferation and myotube formation in primary cultures of adult mouse skeletal muscle. Exp Cell Res 219(1): 169-179.
23. Midrio M. 2006; The denervated muscle: facts and hypotheses. A historical review. Eur J Appl Physiol 98(1): 1-21.
24. Montarras D, Morgan J, Collins C, et al. 2005; Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science 309(5743): 2064-2067.
25. Moon du G, Christ G, Stitzel JD, et al. 2008; Cyclic mechanical preconditioning improves engineered muscle contraction. Tissue Eng A 14(4): 473-482.
26. Naumann K, Pette D. 1994; Effects of chronic stimulation with different impulse patterns on the expression of myosin isoforms in rat myotube cultures. Differentiation 55(3): 203-211.
27. Park H, Bhalla R, Saigal R, et al. 2008; Effects of electrical stimulation in C2C12 muscle constructs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2(5): 279-287.
28. Pedrotty DM, Koh J, Davis BH, et al. 2005; Engineering skeletal myoblasts: roles of three-dimensional culture and electrical stimulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288(4): H1620-1626.
29. Pette D, Vrbova G. 1999; What does chronic electrical stimulation teach us about muscle plasticity? Muscle Nerve 22(6): 666-677.
30. Radisic M, Park H, Shing H, et al. 2004; Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(52): 18129-18134.
31. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. 2008; Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3(6): 1101-1108.
32. Serena E, Flaibani M, Carnio S, et al. 2008; Electrophysiologic stimulation improves myogenic potential of muscle precursor cells grown in a 3D collagen scaffold. Neurol Res 30(2): 207-214.
33. Shefer G, Wleklinski-Lee M, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. 2004; Skeletal muscle satellite cells can spontaneously enter an alternative mesenchymal pathway. J Cell Sci 117(22): 5393-5404.
34. Stern-Straeter J, Bach AD, Stangenberg L, et al. 2005; Impact of electrical stimulation on three-dimensional myoblast cultures-a real-time RT-PCR study. J Cell Mol Med 9(4): 883-892.
35. 2+-ATPase gene. Biochem J 321(3): 845-848.
36. Vandenburgh H, Del Tatto M, Shansky J, et al. 1996; Tissue-engineered skeletal muscle organoids for reversible gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 7(17): 2195-2200.
37. Vandenburgh HH, Karlisch P. 1989; Longitudinal growth of skeletal myotubes in vitro in a new horizontal mechanical cell stimulator. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 25(7): 607-616.
38. Vandenburgh HH, Shansky J, Benesch-Lee F, et al. 2008; Drug-screening platform based on the contractility of tissue-engineered muscle. Muscle Nerve 37(4): 438-447.
39. Wilson SJ, Harris AJ. 1993; Formation of myotubes in aneural rat muscles. Dev Biol 156(2): 509-518.
40. Yamasaki K, Hayashi H, Nishiyama K, et al. 2009; Control of myotube contraction using electrical pulse stimulation for bio-actuator. J Artif Organs 12(2): 131-137.