The effect of three different levels of footwear stability on pain outcomes in women runners: A randomised control trial

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 715-721

  Ryan, Michael B ^a   Valiant, Gordon A ^b   McDonald, Kymberly ^a   Taunton, Jack E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Nike   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RUNNING; SHOE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; POSTURE; PRONATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RUNNING; SHOES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959443000     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: 14730480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069849     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bovens AM, Janssen GM, Vermeer HG, et al. Occurrence of running injuries in adults following a supervised training program. Int J Sports Med 1989;10(Suppl 3):S186-90. (Pubitemid 19258770)
2. Marti B, Vader JP, Minder CE, et al. On the epidemiology of running injuries. The 1984 Bern Grand-Prix study. Am J Sports Med 1988;16:285-94.
3. Jacobs SJ, Berson BL. Injuries to runners: a study of entrants to a 10, 000 meter race. Am J Sports Med 1986;14:151-5. (Pubitemid 16035393)
4. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, et al. A prospective study of running injuries: the Vancouver Sun Run 'In Training' clinics. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:239-44. (Pubitemid 36713714)
5. Walter SD, Hart LE, McIntosh JM, et al. The Ontario cohort study of runningrelated injuries. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2561-4. (Pubitemid 19283214)
6. McKenzie DC, Clement DB, Taunton JE. Running shoes, orthotics, and injuries. Sports Med 1985;2:334-47. (Pubitemid 15020785)
7. Butler RJ, Davis IS, Hamill J. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1998-2005. (Pubitemid 44704256)
8. Butler RJ, Hamill J, Davis I. Effect of footwear on high and low arched runners' mechanics during a prolonged run. Gait Posture 2007;26:219-25. (Pubitemid 46880347)
9. Cheung RT, Ng GY. influence of different footwear on force of landing during running. Phys Ther 2008;88:620-8. (Pubitemid 351620013)
10. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Hamill CL. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983;15:376-81. (Pubitemid 14239232)
11. Stacoff A, Kälin X, Stüssi E. The effects of shoes on the torsion and rearfoot motion in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:482-90.
12. Knapik JJ, Swedler DI, Grier TL, et al. Injury reduction effectiveness of selecting running shoes based on plantar shape. J Strength Cond Res 2009;23:685-97.
13. Richards CE, Magin PJ, Callister R. Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based? Br J Sports Med 2009;43:159-62.
14. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:89-98. (Pubitemid 41728097)
15. Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M, et al. The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:88-93. (Pubitemid 46026739)
16. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the Foot Posture Index. J Foot Ankle Res 2008;1:6.
17. Rauh MJ, Koepsell TD, Rivara FP, et al. Quadriceps angle and risk of injury among high school cross-country runners. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37:725-33.
18. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, et al. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:95-101. (Pubitemid 34289650)
19. Wen DY, Puffer JC, Schmalzried TP. Injuries in runners: a prospective study of alignment. Clin J Sport Med 1998;8:187-94. (Pubitemid 28457123)
20. Lun V, Meeuwisse WH, Stergiou P, et al. Relation between running injury and static lower limb alignment in recreational runners. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:576-80. (Pubitemid 39319208)
21. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:227-36.
22. Pledger G. Compliance in clinical trials: impact on design, analysis and interpretation. In: Schmidt D, Leppik I, eds. Compliance in epilepsy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1988:125-33.
23. Brunet ME, Cook SD, Brinker MR, et al. A survey of running injuries in 1505 competitive and recreational runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1990;30:307-15. (Pubitemid 20347025)
24. Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:1086-90.
25. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001;18:205-7.
26. Heir T, Eide G. Age, body composition, aerobic fitness and health condition as risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in conscripts. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1996;6:222-7. (Pubitemid 126479178)
27. Messier SP, Legault C, Schoenlank CR, et al. Risk factors and mechanisms of knee injury in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:1873-9.
28. van Mechelen W. Running injuries. A review of the epidemiological literature. Sports Med 1992;14:320-35.
29. Ryan M, MacLean C, Taunton JE. A review of anthropometric, biomechanical, neuromuscular and training related factors associated with injury in runners. International Sportmed Journal 2006;7:120-37.