Inbreeding, maternal care and genomic imprinting

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 221, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 559-564

  Wilkins, Jon F ^a,b   Haig, David ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOME; INBREEDING; MATERNAL CARE;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; FERTILIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE SILENCING; GENOME; GENOME IMPRINTING; HEREDITY; INBREEDING; MATERNAL CARE; MOTHER; NATURAL SELECTION; OOCYTE; PATERNITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGENY; SILENT GENE; SPERM;

EID: 0037459922     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3206     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BEECHEY C. V. Peg1/Mest locates distal to the currently defined imprinting region on mouse proximal chromosome 6 and identifies a new imprinting region affecting growth. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 90:2000;309-314.
2. CAMERON E. Z., LINKLATER W. L., STAFFORD K. J., MINOT E. O. Aging and improving reproduc-tive success in horses: declining reproductive value or just older and wiser? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47:2000;243-249.
3. CLUTTON-BROCK T. H. The Evolution of Parental Care. 1991;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
4. HAIG D. Placental hormones, genomic imprinting, and maternal-fetal communication. J. Evol. Biol. 9:1996;357-380.
5. HAIG D. Genetic conflicts and the private life of Peromyscus polionotus. Nat. Genet. 22:1999a;131.
6. HAIG D. Asymmetric relations: internal conflicts and the horror of incest. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20:1999b;83-98.
7. HAIG D. The kinship theory of imprinting. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:2000;9-32.
8. HAIG D., Graham C. Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor-II receptor. Cell. 64:1991;1045-1046.
9. HURST L. D. Peromysci, promiscuity and imprinting. Nat. Genet. 20:1998;315-316.
10. HURST L. D., McVean G. T. Do we understand the evolution of genomic imprinting? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8:1998;701-708.
11. HURST L. D., POMIANKOWSKI A., MCVEAN G. T. Peg3 and the conflict hypothesis. Science. 287:2000;1167.
12. KANEKO-ISHINO T., KUROIWA Y., MIYOSHI N., KOHDA T., SUZUKI R., YOKOYAMA M., VIVILLE S., BARTON S. C., ISHINO F., SURANI M. A. Peg1/Mest imprinted gene on chromosome 6 identified by cDNA subtraction hybridization. Nat. Genet. 11:1995;52-59.
13. LEFEBVRE L., VIVILLE S., BARTON S. C., ISHINO F., KEVERNE E. B., SURANI M. A. Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nat. Genet. 20:1998;163-169.
14. LI L. L., KEVERNE E. B., APARICIO S. A., ISHINO F., BARTON S. C., SURANI M. A. Regulation of maternal behavior and offspring growth by paternally expressed Peg3. Science. 284:1999;330-333.
15. LI L. L., KEVERNE E. B., APARICIO S. A., BARTON S. C., SURANI M. A., ISHINO F. Peg3 and the conflict hypothesis. Science. 287:2000;1167.
16. PENN D., POTTS W. K. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc. R. Soc. London. 265:1998;1299-1306.
17. SMITS G., PARMA J., VASSART G. Peg3 and the conflict hypothesis. Science. 287:2000;1167.
18. STORZ J. F. Genetic consequences of mammalian social structure. J. Mammal. 80:1999;553-569.
19. TRIVERS R., BURT A. Kinship and genomic imprinting. Ohlsson R. Genomic Imprinting. An Interdisciplinary Approach. 1999;1-21 Springer Verlag, Berlin.
20. VRANA P. B., GUAN X. J., INGRAM R. S., TILGHMAN S. M. Genomic imprinting is disrupted in inter-specific Peromyscus hybrids. Nat. Genet. 20:1998;362-365.
21. WILKINS J. F., HAIG D. Genomic imprinting at two antagonistic loci. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 268:2001;1861-1867.