Likelihood Methods for Binary Responses of Present Components in a Cluster

Biometrics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 629-635

  Li, Xiaoyun ^a   Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar ^b   Lipsitz, Stuart ^c   Sinha, Debajyoti ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge density; Clustered data; Logistic link; Random effects

Indexed keywords

RANDOM PROCESSES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING;

BINARY RESPONSE; BRIDGE DENSITY; CLUSTER COMPONENTS; CLUSTER SIZES; CLUSTERED DATUM; LIKELIHOOD METHODS; LOGISTIC LINK; LOGISTICS REGRESSIONS; RANDOM EFFECTS; REGRESSION EFFECTS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

BRIDGE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DISEASE PREVALENCE; ESTIMATION METHOD; HEALTH STATUS; LITERATURE REVIEW; LOGISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79959363634     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01483.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aerts, M., Geys, H., Molenberghs, G., and Ryan, L. M. (2002). Topics in Modelling of Clustered Data. London Chapman and Hall.
2. Agresti, A. (2006). Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edition. New York Wiley.
3. Armitage, G. C. (1999). Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Annals of Periodontology 4, 1-6.
4. Breslow, N. E. and Day, N. E. (1980). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume 1: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Lyon International Agency for Research on Cancer.
5. Darby, M. L. and Walsh, M. M. (1995). Dental Hygiene: Theory and Practice, Philadelphia W. B. Saunders Company.
6. Dunson, D. B., Chen, Z., and Harry, J. (2003). A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes. Biometrics 59, 521-530.
7. Fernandez, J. K., Wiegand, R. E., Salinas, C. F., Grossi, S. G., Sanders, J. J., Lopes-Virella, M. F., and Slate, E. H. (2009). Periodontal disease status in Gullah African Americans with Type 2 diabetics living in South Carolina. Journal of Periodontology 80, 1062-1068.
8. Hoffman, E. B., Sen, P. K., and Weinberg, C. R. (2001). Within-cluster resampling. Biometrika 88, 1121-1134.
9. Liang, K. Y. and Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 13-22.
10. Lin, L., Bandyopadhyay, D., Lipsitz, S. R., and Sinha, D. (2009). Association models for clustered data with binary and continuous responses. Biometrics 66, 287-293.
11. Panageas, K. S., Schrag, D., Localio, A. R., Venkatraman, E. S., and Begg, C. B. (2007). Properties of analysis methods that account for clustering in volume-outcome studies when the primary perdictor is cluster size. Statistics in Medicine 26, 2017-2035.
12. Wang, Z. and Louis, T. A. (2003). Matching conditional and marginal shapes in binary mixed-effects models using a bridge distribution. Biometrika 90, 765-775.
13. White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation under mis-specified models. Econometrica 50, 1-26.
14. Williamson, J. M., Datta, S., and Satten, G. A. (2003). Marginal analysis of clustered data when the cluster size is informative. Biometrics 59, 36-42.
15. Williamson, J. M., Kim, H.-Y., Manatunga, A., and Addiss, D. G. (2008). Modeling survival data with informative cluster size. Statistics in Medicine 27, 543-555.