Association models for clustered data with binary and continuous responses

Biometrics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 287-293

  Lin, Lanjia ^a   Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar ^b   Lipsitz, Stuart R ^c   Sinha, Debajyoti ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bivariate binary and continuous responses; Bridge distribution; Logit link; Probability integral transformation

Indexed keywords

ETHYLENE; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; METADATA; RANDOM PROCESSES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ASSOCIATION MODELS; BIVARIATE; BIVARIATE BINARY AND CONTINUOUS RESPONSE; BIVARIATE RESPONSE; BRIDGE DISTRIBUTION; CLUSTERED DATUM; INTEGRAL TRANSFORMATIONS; LOGIT LINK; PROBABILITY INTEGRAL TRANSFORMATION; RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL;

ETHYLENE GLYCOL;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA SET; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ETHYLENE; LOGISTICS; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MODEL TEST; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMALL MAMMAL; SOFTWARE; TOXICITY;

MUS;

ETHYLENE GLYCOL;

ANIMAL; BIOMETRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MOUSE; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOXICITY;

ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; MICE;

EID: 77949750822     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01232.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aerts, M., Geys, H., Molenberghs, G., and Ryan, L. M. (2002). Topics in Modelling of Clustered Data. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall.
2. Catalano, P. and Ryan, L. M. (1992). Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87, 651-658.
3. Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 829-836.
4. Cox, D. R. and Wermuth, N. (1992). Response models for mixed binary and quantitative variables. Biometrika 79, 441-461.
5. Cox, D. R. and Wermuth, N. (1994). Multivariate Dependencies: Models, Analysis and Interpretation. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. Dunson, D. B., Chen, Z., and Harry, J. (2003). A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes. Biometrics 59, 521-530.
7. Fitzmaurice, G. M. and Laird N. M. (1995). Regression models for a bivariate discrete and continuous outcome with clustering. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 845-852.
8. Geys, H., Molenberghs, G., and Ryan, L. M. (1999). Pseudolikelihood modeling of multivariate outcomes in developmental toxicology. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 734-745.
9. Gueorguieva, R. and Agresti, A. (2001). A correlated probit model for joint modeling of clustered binary and continuous responses. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1102-1112.
10. Hougaard, P. (2000). Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data. New York: Springer.
11. Krzanowski, W. J. (1988). Principles of Multivariate Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Lehmann, E. L. and Casella, G. (1998). Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd edition. New York: Springer.
13. Little, R. J. A. and Schluchter, M. D. (1985). Maximum likelihood estimation for mixed continuous and categorical data with missing values. Biometrika 72, 497-512.
14. Price, C. J., Kimmel, C. A., Tyl, R. W., and Marr, M. C. (1985). The developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in rats and mice. Toxicological Applications in Pharmacology 81, 113-127.
15. Regan, M. M. and Catalano, P. J. (1999). Likelihood models for clustered binary and continuous outcomes: Applications to developmental toxicology. Biometrics 55, 760-768.
16. Royston, P., and Altman, D. G. (1994). Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: Parsimonious parametric modelling. Applied Statistics 43, 429-467.
17. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman and Hall.
18. Wang, Z. and Louis, T. A. (2003). Matching conditional and marginal shapes in binary mixed-effects models using a bridge distribution function. Biometrika 90, 765-775.