Teledermatology: A tool for remote supervision of a general practitioner with special interest in dermatology

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 489-494

  Thind, C K ^a   Brooker, I ^b,c   Ormerod, A D ^a  

^a ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b Macduff Medical Practice   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RURAL AREA; SCHOOL CHILD; SKIN CARE; TELECONSULTATION; TELEDERMATOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DERMATOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; SCOTLAND; SKIN DISEASES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 79959357927     PISSN: 03076938     EISSN: 13652230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2011.04073.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Nieto-Garcia A et al. Store-and-forward teledermatology in skin cancer triage: experience and evaluation of 2009 teleconsultations. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143: 479-84.
2. May C, Giles L, Gupta G. Prospective observational comparative study assessing the role of store and forward teledermatology triage in skin cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33: 736-9.
3. Bowns IR, Collins K, Walters SJ et al. Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10: iii-xi, 1-39.
4. Eminovic N, de Keizer NF, Bindels PJ et al. Maturity of teledermatology evaluation research: a systematic literature review. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 412-19.
5. English JS, Eedy DJ. Has teledermatology in the U.K. finally failed? Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 411.
6. Fruhauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros-Rudolph CM et al. Pilot study using teledermatology to manage high-need patients with psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 200-1.
7. Caumes E, Le BV, Couzigou C et al. Dermatoses associated with travel to Burkina Faso and diagnosed by means of teledermatology. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150: 312-16.
8. van den Akker TW, Reker CH, Knol A et al. Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7: 193-8.
9. van der Heijden JP, Spuls PI, Voorbraak FP et al. Tertiary teledermatology: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2010; 16: 56-62.
10. Romero G, Sanchez P, Garcia M et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing store-and-forward teledermatology alone and in combination with web-camera videoconferencing. Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35: 311-17.
11. Halpern SM. Does teledermoscopy validate teledermatology for triage of skin lesions? Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 709-10.
12. Tan E, Yung A, Jameson M et al. Successful triage of patients referred to a skin lesion clinic using teledermoscopy (IMAGE IT trial). Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 803-11.
13. Warshaw EM, Lederle FA, Grill JP et al. Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61: 753-65.
14. Warshaw EM, Gravely AA, Bohjanen KA et al. Interobserver accuracy of store and forward teledermatology for skin neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62: 513-16.
15. van der HJ. Teledermatology integrated in the Dutch national healthcare system. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24: 615-16.
16. Coast J, Noble S, Noble A et al. Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care. BMJ 2005; 331: 1444-9.