Randomized controlled trial comparing store-and-forward teledermatology alone and in combination with web-camera videoconferencing

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 311-317

  Romero, G ^a   Sanchez P ^a   Garcia M ^a   Cortina, P ^a   Vera, E ^a   Garrido, J A ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CIUDAD REAL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; STORE AND FORWARD; TELECONSULTATION; TELEDERMATOLOGY; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DERMATOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN DISEASES; TELEMEDICINE; VIDEOCONFERENCING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77749328348     PISSN: 03076938     EISSN: 13652230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03503.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wurm EM, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Wurm R, Soyer HP. Telemedicine and teledermatology: past, present and future. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2008 6 : 106 112.
2. Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. Br J Dermatol 2001 144 : 696 707.
3. Hersh W, Hickam D, Severance S et al. Telemedicine for the Medicare Population: Update. AHRQ no. 06-E007, 2006.
4. Whited JD. Summary of the status of Teledermatology Research. ATA 2005. Available at: http://www.americantelemed.org/files/public/membergroups/ teledermatology/Telederm-Research-Summary-2008.pdf (accessed 10 February 2009).
5. Burdick AE, Berman B. Teledermatology. Adv Dermatol 1997 12 : 19 45.
6. Baba M, Seckin D, Kapdagli S. A comparison of teledermatology using store-and-forward methodology alone, and in combination with web camera videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 2005 11 : 354 360.
7. Burg G, Hasse U, Cipolat C et al. Teledermatology: just cool or a real tool? Dermatology 2005 210 : 169 173.
8. Ribera M, Peñas PF, Barco L. La teledermatología hoy. Piel 2001 16 : 225 237.
9. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. BMJ 2000 320 : 1252 1256.
10. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R et al. A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study. Br J Dermatol 2000 143 : 1241 1247.
11. Romero G, Garcia M, Vera E et al. Preliminary results of DERMATEL. Prospective randomized study comparing synchronous and asynchronous modalities of teledermatology. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2006 97 : 630 636.
12. Krupinski EA, LeSueur B, Ellsworth L et al. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Telemed J 1999 5 : 257 263.
13. Pak HS, Harden D, Cruess D et al. Teledermatology: an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study, part I. Cutis 2003 71 : 399 403. (Pubitemid 38010798)
14. Lim AC, Egerton IB, See A, Shumack SP. Accuracy and reliability of store-and-forward teledermatology: preliminary results from the St George Teledermatology Project. Australas J Dermatol 2001 42 : 247 251.
15. Taylor P, Goldsmith P, Murray K et al. Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals. Br J Dermatol 2001 144 : 328 333.
16. High WA, Houston MS, Calobrisi SD et al. Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000 42 : 776 783.
17. Whited JD, Hall RP, Simel DL et al. Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999 41 : 693 702.
18. Lesher JL Jr., Davis LS, Gourdin FW et al. Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneous diseases: a blinded comparative study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998 38 : 27 31.
19. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care. J Telemed Telecare 2000 6 (Suppl. 1 S1 3.
20. Du Moulin MF, Bullens-Goessens YI, Henquet CJ et al. The reliability of diagnosis using store-and-forward teledermatology. J Telemed Telecare 2003 9 : 249 252.
21. Zelickson BD, Homan L. Teledermatology in the nursing home. Arch Dermatol 1997 133 : 171 174.
22. Moreno-Ramirez D, Ferrandiz L, Nieto-Garcia A et al. Store-and-forward teledermatology in skin cancer triage: experience and evaluation of 2009 teleconsultations. Arch Dermatol 2007 143 : 479 484.
23. Martinez-Garcia S, Boz-Gonzalez J, Martin-Gonzalez T et al. Teledermatology. Review of 917 teleconsults. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007 98 : 318 324.
24. Edison KE, Ward DS, Dyer JA et al. Diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and management concordance in live-interactive and store-and-forward teledermatology compared to in-person examination. Telemed J E Health 2008 14 : 889 895.
25. Romero G. Fiabilidad de la teleconsulta en dermatología [Reliability of teleconsultations in dermatology]. PhD Thesis. Madrid : Faculty of Medicine, University Complutense de Madrid, 2007.
26. Romero G, Cortina P, Vera E. Telemedicine and teledermatology (II): current state of research on dermatology teleconsultation. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2008 99 : 586 507.