Introduction: The evolving field of neurorehabilitation

CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 443-448

  Dombovy, Mary L ^a,b  

^a UNITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE REGENERATION; NEUROREHABILITATION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STROKE; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

EID: 79959343861     PISSN: 10802371     EISSN: 15386899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/01.CON.0000399065.23826.f0     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Stein DG. Concepts of CNS plasticity and their implications for understanding recovery after brain damage. In: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD, editors. Brain injury medicine: principles and practice. New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing, 2007:97-108.
2. Jones TA, Allred RP, Adkins DL, et al. Remodeling the brain with behavioral experience after stroke. Stroke 2009;40(3 suppl):S136-S138.
3. Einstein O, Ben-Hur T. The changing face of neural stem cell therapy in neurologic diseases. Arch Neurol 2008;65(4):452-456. (Pubitemid 351549952)
4. Miller RH, Bai L, Lennon DP, Caplan AI. The potential of mesenchymal stem cells for neural repair. Discovery Med;53. www. discoverymedicine.com/Robert-H- Miller/2010/03/17/the-potential-of-mesenchymalstem- cells-for-neural-repair/. Published March 17, 2010. Accessed October 11, 2010.
5. Fawcett J. Molecular control of brain plasticity and repair. Prog Brain Res 2009; 175:501-509.
6. Johnston MV. Plasticity in the developing brain: implications for rehabilitation. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009;15(2):94-101.
7. Mueller BK, Mueller R, Schoemaker H. Stimulating neuroregeneration as a therapeutic drug approach for traumatic brain injury. Br J Pharmacol 2009;157(5): 675-685.
8. Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24(2):125-135.
9. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function. Arch Neurol 2004;61(12):1844-1848. (Pubitemid 39612943)
10. Verma P, Garcia-Alias G, Fawcett JW. Spinal cord repair: bridging the divide. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22(5):429-437.
11. Savitz SI. Introduction to cellular therapy: the next frontier for stroke therapeutics. Stroke 2009;40(3 suppl):S141-S142.
12. Chopp M, Li Y, Zang ZG. Mechanisms underlying improved recovery of neurological function after stroke in the rodent after treatment with neurorestorative cell-based therapies. Stroke 2009;40(3 suppl):S143-S145.
13. Bersano A, Ballabio E, Lanfranconi S, et al. Clinical studies in stem cells transplantation for stroke: a review. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2010;8(1):29-34.
14. Kalra L, Ratan RR. Advances in stroke regenerative medicine 2007. Stroke 2008;39(2):273-275.
15. Dobkin BH. What matters in cellular transplantation for spinal cord injury: the cells, the rehabilitation or the best mix? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24(1): 7-9.
16. Ward NS, Frackowiak RS. The functional anatomy of cerebral reorganisation after focal brain injury. J Physiol Paris 2006; 99(4-6):425-436. (Pubitemid 43850797)
17. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke: a brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997;28(1):110-117. (Pubitemid 27039474)
18. Ward NS. Future perspectives in functional neurology in stroke recovery. Eura Medicophys 2007;43(2):285-294.
19. Enzinger C, Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H, et al. Functional MRI correlates of lower limb function in stroke victims with gait impairment. Stroke 2008;39(5):1507-1513.
20. Winhuisen L, Thiel A, Schumacher B, et al. Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia: a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study. Stroke 2005;36(8):1759-1763. (Pubitemid 41102236)
21. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006;129(pt 6):1371-1384. (Pubitemid 43999371)
22. Hodics T, Cohen LG, Cramer SC. Functional imaging of intervention effects in stroke motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(12 suppl 2):S36-S42.
23. Schaechter JD, Perdue KL. Enhanced cortical activation in the contralesional hemisphere of chronic stroke patients in response to motor skill challenge. Cereb Cortex 2008; 18(3):638-647. (Pubitemid 351264234)
24. Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Ameli M, Fink GR. Interhemispheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23(7):641-656.
25. Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:8.
26. Crinion JT, Leff AP. Recovery and treatment of aphasia after stroke: functional imaging studies. Curr Opin Neurol 2007;20(6): 667-673. (Pubitemid 350085008)
27. He BJ, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 2007;53(6):905-918. (Pubitemid 46367552)
28. Kim YH, Yoo WK, Ko MH, et al. Plasticity of the attentional network after brain injury and cognitive rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23(5):468-477.
29. Dobkin BH. Motor rehabilitation after stroke, traumatic brain, and spinal cord injury: common denominators within recent clinical trials. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22(6): 563-569.
30. Blesch A, Tuszynski MH. Spinal cord injury: plasticity, regeneration and the challenge of translational drug development. Trends Neurosci 2009;32(1):41-47.
31. Ibrahim AG, Kirkwood PA, Raisman G, Li Y. Restoration of hand function in a rat model of repair of brachial plexus injury. Brain 2009;132(pt 5):1268-1276.
32. Maier IC, Ichiyama RM, Courtine G, et al. Differential effects of anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment and treadmill training in rats with incomplete spinal cord injury. Brain 2009; 132(pt 6):1426-1440.
33. Girgis J, Merrett D, Kirkland S, et al. Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery. Brain 2007;130 (pt 11):2993-3003. (Pubitemid 350033978)
34. Bigbee AJ, Crown ED, Ferguson AR, et al. Two chronic motor training paradigms differentially influence acute instrumental learning in spinally transected rats. Behav Brain Res 2007;180(1):95-101. (Pubitemid 46661016)
35. Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 2006;66(4):484-493.
36. Maldonado M, Allred F, Fethauser E, et al. Motor skill training, but not voluntary exercise, improves skilled reaching after unilateral ischemic lesions of the sensorimotor cortex in rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22(3):250-261. (Pubitemid 351561675)
37. Döbrössy MD, Dunnett SB. Optimising plasticity: environmental and training associated factors in transplant-mediated brain repair. Rev Neurosci 2005;16(1):1-21.
38. Cheeran B, Cohen L, Dobkin B, et al; Cumberland Consensus Working Group. The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23(2):97-107.
39. Forsyth R, Thuy V, Salorio C, et al. Review: efficient rehabilitation trial designs using disease progress modeling: a pediatric traumatic brain injury example. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24(3): 225-234.