Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 94, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 3642-3650

  Zhang, Z ^a,b   Ding, X ^a   Liu, J ^a   Zhang, Q ^a   De Koning, D J ^b,c  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

BayesB; Genomic selection; Low density panel; TABLUP

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; GENOME; MALE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

BOS;

EID: 79959343703     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3917     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cleveland M.A., Forni S., Deeb N., Maltecca C. Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels. BMC Proc. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):S6.
2. Coster A., Bastiaansen J.W.M., Calus M.P.L., Maliepaard C., Bink M.C.A.M. QTLMAS 2009: Simulated dataset. BMC Proc. 2010, 4(Suppl 1):S3.
3. Daetwyler H.D., Pong-Wong R., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 2010, 185:1021-1031.
4. Daetwyler H.D., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3395.
5. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman Group Ltd., New York, NY. 4th ed.
6. Goddard M. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009, 136:245-257.
7. Goddard M.E., Hayes B.J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:381-391.
8. González-Recio O., Gianola D., Long N., Weigel K.A., Rosa G.J., Avendaño S. Nonparametric methods for incorporating genomic information into genetic evaluations: An application to mortality in broilers. Genetics 2008, 178:2305-2313.
9. González-Recio O., Gianola D., Rosa G.J., Weigel K.A., Kranis A. Genome-assisted prediction of a quantitative trait measured in parents and progeny: Application to food conversion rate in chickens. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:3.
10. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 2009, 182:343-353.
11. Harris B.L., Montgomerie W.A. Current status of the use of genomic information in the national genetic evaluation in New Zealand. Proc. of the Interbull international Workshop in Genomic information in genetic evaluations 2009, 35-38.
12. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:433-443.
13. Hill W.G., Robertson A. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1968, 38:226-231.
14. Jacquard A. The Genetic Structure of Populations 1974, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
15. König S., Simianer H., Willam A. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:382-391.
16. Long N., Gianola D., Rosa G.J., Weigel K.A., Avendano S. Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: Application to early mortality in broilers. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007, 124:377-389.
17. Meuwissen T.H.E. Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:35.
18. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
19. Schaeffer L.R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006, 123:218-223.
20. Shepherd R.K., Meuwissen T.H., Woolliams J.A. Genomic selection and complex trait prediction using a fast EM algorithm applied to genome-wide markers. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:529.
21. Solberg T.R., Sonesson A.K., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2447-2454.
22. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
23. VanRaden P.M., O'Connell J.R., Wiggans G.R., Weigel K.A. Combining different marker densities in genomic evaluation. Proc. 2010 Interbull Meeting, Riga, Latvia 2010.
24. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
25. Vazquez A.I., Rosa G.J.M., Weigel K.A., de los Campos G., Gianola D., Allison D.B. Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5942-5949.
26. Weigel K.A., de los Campos G., González-Recio O., Naya H., Wu X.L., Long N., Rosa G.J., Gianola D. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5248-5257.
27. Weigel K.A., Van Tassell C.P., O'Connell J.R., VanRaden P.M., Wiggans G.R. Prediction of unobserved single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes of Jersey cattle using reference panels and population-based imputation algorithms. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:2229-2238.
28. Zhang Z., Liu J.F., Ding X., Bijma P., de Koning D.-J., Zhang Q. Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12648.