Genome-assisted prediction of a quantitative trait measured in parents and progeny: Application to food conversion rate in chickens

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Gonzlez Recio, Oscar ^a   Gianola, Daniel ^a   Rosa, Guilherme Jm ^a   Weigel, Kent A ^a   Kranis, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Aviagen   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BODY MASS; PHENOTYPE; POULTRY; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; YOUNG POPULATION;

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 66249089985     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Genome wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. JL Hirschhorn MJ Daly, Nat Rev Genet 2005 6 95 108 10.1038/nrg1521 15716906
2. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. THE Meuwissen BJ Hayes ME Goddard, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733
3. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. LR Schaeffer, J Anim Breed Genet 2006 123 4 218 223 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595. x 16882088
4. Bayesian methods in animal breeding theory. D Gianola RL Fernando, J Anim Sci 1986 63 217 244
5. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. S Xu, Genetics 2003 163 789 801 12618414
6. Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. D Gianola JBCHM van Kaam, Genetics 2008 178 2289 2303 18430950 10.1534/genetics.107.084285
7. Genomic-Assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. D Gianola RL Fernando A Stella, Genetics 2006 173 1761 1776 16648593 10.1534/genetics.105.049510 (Pubitemid 44127674)
8. Nonparametric methods for incorporating genomic information into genetic evaluations: An application to mortality in broilers. O Gonzlez-Recio D Gianola N Long KA Weigel GJM Rosa S Avendão, Genetics 2008 178 2305 2313 18430951 10.1534/genetics.107.084293
9. Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: Application to early mortality in broilers. N Long D Gianola GJM Rosa K Weigel S Avendão, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 6 377 389 18076475
10. Genomic selection. R Fernando D Habier C Stricker JCM Dekkers LR Totir, Acta Agric Scand Sec A 2007 57 192 195
11. Estimation by simulation of the efficiency of the French marker-assisted selection program in dairy cattle. F Guillaume S Fritz D Boichard T Druet, Genet Sel Evol 2008 40 91 102 10.1051/gse:2007036 18096117
12. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. WM Muir, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 342 355 18076471
13. Association of twelve immune-related genes with performance of three broiler lines in two different hygiene environments. X Ye S Avendão JCM Dekkers SJ Lamont, Poult Sci 2006 85 1555 1569 16977841
14. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 single nucleotide polymorphism. GK Wong B Liu J Wang Y Zhang X Yang Z Zhang Q Meng1 J Zhou D Li J Zhang P Ni S Li L Ran H Li J Zhang R Li S Li H Zheng W Lin G Li X Wang W Zhao J Li C Ye M Dai J Ruan Y Zhou Y Li X He Y Zhang J Wang X Huang W Tong J Chen J Ye C Chen N Wei G Li L Dong F Lan Y Sun Z Zhang Z Yang Y Yu Y Huang D He Y Xi D Wei Q Qi W Li J Shi M Wang F Xie J Wang X Zhang P Wang Y Zhao N Li N Yang W Dong S Hu C Zeng W Zheng B Hao LW Hillier SP Yang WC Warren RK Wilson M Brandström H Ellegren RPMA Crooijmans JJ van der Poel H Bovenhuis MAM Groenen I Ovcharenko L Gordon L Stubbs S Lucas T Glavina A Aerts P Kaiser L Rothwell JR Young S Rogers BA Walker A van Hateren J Kaufman N Bumstead SJ Lamont H Zhou PM Hocking D Morrice DJ de Koning A Law N Bartley DW Burt H Hunt HH Cheng U Gunnarsson P Wahlberg L Andersson E Kindlund MT Tammi B Andersson C Webber CP Ponting IM Overton PE Boardman H Tang SJ Hubbard SA Wilson J Yu J Wang HM Yang, et al. Nature 2004 432 717 722 15592405 10.1038/nature03156 (Pubitemid 39656286)
15. Linkage disequilibrium in related breeding lines of chickens. C Andreescu S Avendano S Brown A Hassen SJ Lamont JCM Dekkers, Genetics 2007 177 2161 2169 17947400 10.1534/genetics.107.082206 (Pubitemid 350276996)
16. WJ Ewens GR Grant, Statistical Methods in Bioinformatics: an introduction New York: Springer-Verlag 2005 49 51
17. DA Sorensen D Gianola, Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC methods in Quantitative Genetics New York: Springer-Verlag 2002 588 595
18. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. CR Henderson, Biometrics 1975 31 423 447 10.2307/2529430 1174616
19. Analysis of litter size and average litter weight in pigs using a recursive model. L Varona DA Sorensen R Thompson, Genetics 2007 177 1791 1799 17720909 10.1534/genetics.107.077818 (Pubitemid 350277071)
20. Some results on Tchebycheffian spline functions. G Kimeldorf G Wahba, J Math Anal Appl 1971 33 82 95 10.1016/0022-247X(71)90184-3
21. G Wahba, Spline model for observational data Philadelphia: Society for industrial and applied mathematics 1990
22. Support vector machines, reproducing kernel Hilbert space and randomized GACV. G Wahba, Advances in Kernel MethodsSupport Vector Learning Cambridge: MIT Press, Scholkopf B, Burges C, Smola A, 1999 68 88
23. L Wasserman, All of Non-parametric Statistics New York: Springer 2006 55 56
24. Optimal properties and adaptive tuning of standard and non-standard support vector machines. G Wahba Y Lin Y Lee H Zhang, Nonlinear estimation and classification New York: Springer, Denison D, Hansen M, Holmes C, Mallick B, Yu B, 2002 125 143
25. Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. B Efron, Ann Stat 1979 7 1 1 26 10.1214/aos/1176344552
26. Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. B Efron, Biometrika 1981 68 589 599 10.1093/biomet/68.3.589
27. MCMC based estimations of variance components in a very large dairy cattle data set. L Janss G de Jong, Proceedings of the Computational Cattle Breeding '99 Workshop Tuusula, Finland 1999 62 67
28. Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. A Legarra I Misztal, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 360 366 10.3168/jds.2007-0403 18096959
29. Indirect solution of mixed model equations. I Misztal D Gianola, J Dairy Sci 1987 70 716 723
30. Heritability and genetic correlation estimates for performance and carcass and body composition traits in a male broiler line. LG Gaya JB Ferraz FM Rezende GB Mourao EC Mattos JP Eler TM Filho, Poult Sci 2006 85 837 843 16673760
31. Selection for food conversion in broilers: Direct and correlated responses to selection for body-weight gain, food consumption and food conversion ratio. RAE Pym PJ Nicholls, Br Poult Sci 1979 20 1 73 86 10.1080/00071667908416551
32. Genetics of phytate phosphorus bioavailability: heritability and genetic correlations with growth and feed utilization traits in a randombred chicken population. W Zhang SE Aggrey GM Pesti HM Edwards RI Bakalli, Poult Sci 2003 82 1075 1079 12872962
33. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. R Tibshirani, J Royal Stat Soc B 1996 58 267 288
34. The Bayesian Lasso. T Park G Casella, J Am Statist Assoc 2008 103 681 686 10.1198/016214508000000337
35. Extending Xu's Bayesian model for estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. CJF ter Braak MP Boer MCAM Bink, Genetics 2005 170 1435 1438 15911578 10.1534/genetics.105.040469 (Pubitemid 41105496)
36. Validation of genomic selection in an outbred mice population. A Legarra JM Elsen E Manfredi C Robert-Graniè Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of European Association for Animal Production: 26-29 August 2007; Ireland, Dublin 2007 session 18, abstract 1071
37. Commercial application of marker-and gene-assisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons. J Dekkers, J Anim Sci 2004 82 313 E328 15471812