The use of 3D geological models in the development of the conceptualgroundwater model;Die Anwendung geologischer 3D-modelle bei der Entwicklung eines konzeptionellen Grundwassermodells

Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Geowissenschaften

Volumn 161, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 237-249

  Royse, Katherine R ^a   Kessler, Holger ^a   Robins, Nicholas S ^a   Hughes, Andrew G ^a   Mathers, Stephen J ^a  

^a BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aquifers; Three dimensional models; United Kingdom; Water management

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959321444     PISSN: 18601804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/1860-1804/2010/0161-0237     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aldiss, D.T., Burke, H.F., Chacksfield, B.C. & Tragheim, D.G. (2006): Absolute fixing of tide gauge benchmarks and land levels: the BGS contribution to a report on a study of the London and Thames estuary region.- British Geol. Survey Confidential Commissioned Rep., CR/07/043.
2. Barton, C.M. & Royse, K.R. (2000): Stratigraphy and geological structure of the principal aquifer sequences in the catchment of the River Avon near Malmesbury.- In: British Geol. Survey Technical Rep., CR/00/029c, 27.
3. Bassington, F. (1990): Rising groundwater levels in the United Kingdom.- Proceedings Inst. Civil Engineers, 88 (1): 1037-1057, London (Telford Serv.)
4. Bradshaw, J., Caiger, N., Halpin, M., Le Gear, R., Pearce, A., Pearman, H., Reeve, T. & Sowan, P. (1991): Kent and East Sussex underground: 128 p., Sittingbourne (Meresborough).
5. Bristow, C.R., Mortimore, R.N. & Wood, C.J. (1997): Lithostratigraphy for mapping the Chalk of southern England.- Proceed ings Geol. Assoc., 108: 293-315, Middlesex (NJ) (Geol. Soc. Publ. House).
6. Clarke, S.M. (2004): Confidence in geological interpretation. A methodology for evaluating uncertainty in common two and three-dimensional representations of subsurface geology.-British Geol. Survey Internal Rep., 29.
7. De Donatis, M., Borraccini, F. & Susini, S. (2008): Sheet 280- Fosombrone 3D: a study project for a new geological map of Italy in three dimensions.- Computers & Geosci., doi: 10.1016/j.cargeo.2007.09.004.
8. Ellison, R.A., Woods, M.A., Allen, D.J., Forster, A., Pharaoh, T.C. & King, C. (2004): Geology of London Sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales).- British Geol. Survey.
9. European Community (2000): The water framework directive 200/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.- European Community, Brussels.
10. Farrant, A.R. (2001): Karst development in southern English Chalk.- In: Beck, B.F. & Herring, J.G. (eds.): Geotechnical and environmental applications of karst geology and hydrology: 77-82, Lisse (Swets & Zeitlinger).
11. Ford, J.R., Burke, H.F., Royse, K.R. & Mathers, S.J. (2008): The 3D geology of London and the Thames Gateway: a modern approach to geological surveying and its relevance in the urban environment.- In: Cities and their underground environment: 11th European e-conference of the International Association for Engineering Geology, Madrid, Spain, September 2008: 15-19.
12. Ford, J.R., Mathers, S.J., Royse, K.R., Aldiss, D.T. & Morgan, D. J.R. (2010): Geological 3D modelling: scientific discovery and enhanced understanding of the subsurface, with examples from the UK.- Z. dt. Ges. Geowiss., 161 (2): 205-218 (this volume), Stuttgart (Schweizerbart).
13. Gibbs, B. (1993): Mineral industry software.- Min. Annu. Rev., 1993: 57-63, London (Min. J. Publ.).
14. Harris, C.S., Hart, M.B., Varley, P.M. & Warren, C.D. (1996): Engineering geology of the channel tunnel: 526 p. (Telford Publishing).
15. Howard, A., Hatton, B., Reitsma, F. & Lawrie, K. (2009): Developing a geoscience knowledge framework for a national geological survey organisation.- Computers & Geosci., 35 (4): 820-835, Amsterdam (Elsevier).
16. Jackson, C.R., Hughes, A.G., Ó Dochartaigh, B.É., Robins, N.S. & Peach, D.W. (2005): Numerical testing of conceptual models of groundwater flow: a case study using the Dumfries Basin Aquifer.- Scottish J. Geol., 41 (1): 51-60, Edinburgh (Scottish Academ. Pr.).
17. Kaufmann, O. & Martin, T. (2008): 3D geological modelling from boreholes, cross-sections and geological maps, applications over former natural gas storages in coal mines.- Computers and Geosci., 34: 278-290, Amsterdam (Elsevier).
18. Kessler, H., Mathers, S.J., Neber, A., Aldiss, D.T., Bridge, D., Ford, J.R., Garcia-Bajo, M., Hulland, V., Napier, B., Price, S.J., Royse, K., Rutter, H., Terrington, R.L. & Wildman, G. (2008): GSI3D- The software and methodology to build systematic near-surface 3-D geological models.- British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/08/001.
19. Kessler, H., Mathers, S. & Sobisch, H.-G. (2009): The capture and dissemination of integrated 3D geospatial knowledge at the British Geological Survey using GSI3D software and methodology.- Computers & Geosci., 35 (6): 1311-1321, Amsterdam (Elsevier).
20. Lemon, A.M. & Jones, N.L. (2003): Building solid models from boreholes and user-defined cross-sections.- Computers and Geosci., 29: 547-555, Amsterdam (Elsevier).
21. Lucas, H. & Robinson, V. (1995): Modelling of rising groundwater levels in the Chalk aquifer of the London Basin.- Quart. J. Engng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 28: S51-S62, London (Geol. Soc. London).
22. Newell, A.J. & Bloomfield, J.P. (2007): Geological characterization of the Cray catchment with some implications for the hydrogeology.- British Geol. Survey Commissioned Rep., I.: 42.
23. Newman, T. (2009): The impact of adverse geological conditions on the design and construction of the Thames Water Ring Main in Greater London, UK.- Quart. J. Engng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 42 (1): 5-21, London (Geol. Soc. London).
24. Perrin, M., Zhu, Z., Rainaud, J.-F. & Schnieder, S. (2005): Knowledge- driven applications for geological modelling.- J. Petroleum Sci. Engng., 47: 89-104, Amsterdam (Eldevier).
25. Robins, N.S., Rutter, H.K., Dumpleton, S. & Peach, D.W. (2005): The role of 3D visualisation as an analytical tool preparatory to numerical modelling.- J. Hydrol., 301 (1-4): 287-295, Amsterdam (Elsevier).
26. Rosenbaum, M.S. (2003): Characterisation of the shallow subsurface: implications for urban infrastructure and environmental assessment.- In: Rosenbaum, M.S. & Turner, A.K. (eds.): New paradigms in subsurface prediction.- Lect. Notes Earth Sci., 99: 3-6, Berlin (Springer).
27. Rosenbaum, M.S. & Turner, K. (2003): New paradigms in subsurface prediction: characterization of the shallow subsurface: implications for urban infrastructure and environmental assessment.- Lect. Notes Earth Sci., 99: 105-114, Berlin (Springer).
28. Royse, K.R. (2008): The London Chalk model.- British Geol. Survey Commissioned Rep.,CR/08/125.
29. Royse, K.R. (2009): New insights into the geology under London through the analysis of 3D models.- 6th EUREGEO 2009, Munich.
30. Royse, K.R. (2010) Combining numerical and cognitive 3D modeling approaches in order to determine the structure of the Chalk in the London Basin.- Computers & Geosci., 36: 500-511, Amsterdam (Elsevier).
31. Royse, K.R., Reeves, H.J. & Gibson, A.R. (2008): The modeling and visualisation of digital geoscientific data as an aid to landuse planning in the urban environment, an example from the Thames Gateway.- In: Liverman, D.G.E., Pereira, C. & Marker, B. (eds.): Communicating environmental geoscience.- Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ., 305: 89-106, London (Geol. Soc. London).
32. Royse, K.R., Rutter, H.K. & Entwisle, D.C. (2009): Property attribution of 3D geological models in the Thames Gateway: new ways of visualising geoscientific information.- Bull. Engng. Geol. Environm., 68: 1-16, Berlin (Springer).
33. Sharpe, D.R., Hinton, M.J., Russell, H.A.J. & Desbarats, A.J. (2002): The need for basin analysis in regional hydrogeological studies: Oak Ridges Moraine, Southern Ontario.- Geosci. Canada, 29 (1): 3-20, Waterloo (Ontario) (Geol. Assoc. Canada).
34. Simpson, B., Blower, T., Craig, R. & Wilkinson, W. (1989): The engineering implications of rising groundwater levels in the deep aquifer beneath London.- CIRIA Spec. Publ., 89: 116 p., London (CIRIA).
35. Sobisch, H.-G. (2000): Ein digitales räumliches Modell des Quartärs der GK 25 Blatt 3508 Nordhorn auf der Basis vernetzter Profilschnitte: 113 p., Aachen (Shaker).
36. Sumbler, M.G. (1996): British regional geology: London and the Thames Valley.- HMSO for the British Geol. Survey, London.
37. Turner, A.K. (2006): Challenges and trends for geological modeling and visualisation.- Bull. Engng. Geol. Environm., 65: 109-127. Berlin (Springer).
38. Wonderen, J. (2003): London Basin groundwater model report on model upgrade and re-calibration: 149 p. Cambridge (Mott Macdonald).
39. Wycisk, P., Hubert, T., Gossel, W. & Neumann, C. (2009): Highresolution 3D spatial modelling of complex geological structures for an environmental risk assessment of abundant mining and industrial megasites.- Computers & Geosci., 35 (1): 165-182.Amsterdam (Elsevier).
40. Xue, Y., Sun, M. & Ma, A. (2004): On the reconstruction of threedimensional complex geological objects using Delaunay triangulation.- Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 20: 89-104. Amsterdam (Elsevier)