The modelling and visualization of digital geoscientific data as a communication aid to land-use planning in the urban environment: An example from the Thames Gateway

Geological Society Special Publication

Volumn 305, Issue , 2008, Pages 89-106

  Royse, K R ^a   Reeves, H J ^a   Gibson, A R ^a  

^a BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOLOGICAL HAZARD; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; MODELING; SOFTWARE; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBANIZATION; VISUALIZATION;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; THAMES RIVER [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 72049101638     PISSN: 03058719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1144/SP305.10     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anonymous. 1995. The Thames Gateway Planning Framework RPG9A. HMSO, London.
2. Bates, M.R. 1998. Locating and evaluating archaeology below the alluvium: the role of sub-surface stratigraphic modeling. Lithics, 19, 4-18.
3. Bates, M.R. & Bates, C.R. 2000. Multidisciplinary approaches to the geoarchaeological evaluation of deeply stratified sedimentary sequences: examples from Pleistocene and Holocene deposits in southern England, United Kingdom. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 845-858.
4. Bell, F.G. & Culshaw, M.G. 1998. Some geohazards caused by soil mineralogy, chemistry and microfabric: a review. In: Maund, J.G. & Eddleston, M. (eds) Geohazards in Engineering Geology, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 15, 427-441.
5. Berry, F.G. 1979. Late Quaternary scour hollows and related features in central London. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 12, 9-29.
6. Bobrowsky, P.T. 2002. Geoenvironmental mapping: methods, theory and practice. Balkema, Rotterdam.
7. Bowie, R. 2005. Creating a digital landslide. Geoscientist, 15, 4-7.
8. Bristow, R., Mortimore, R.N. & Wood, C. 1997. Lithostratigraphy for mapping the Chalk of southern England. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 109, 293-315.
9. British Standards Institution. 1999. British Standard Code of Practice for Site Investigations. British Standards Institution, London.
10. Brook, D. & Marker, B.R. 1987. Thematic geological mapping as an essential tool in land use planning. In: Culshaw, M.G., Bell, F.G., Cripps, J.C. & O'Hara, M. (eds) Planning and Engineering Geology, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 4, 211-214.
11. Bruntland, G. 1987. Our Common Future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Burnett, A.D. & Fookes, P.G. 1974. A regional engineering geological study of the London Clay in the London and Hampshire Basins. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 7(3), 257-296.
13. Canadian Institute of Planners, 2000. What do planners do? About planning. Canadian Institute of Planners. World Wide Web Address: http://www.cip-icu.ca/English/aboutplan/what.htm.
14. Chandler, R.J. & Apted, J.P. 1988. The effect of weathering on the strength of London Clay. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 21, 59-68.
15. CIRIA. 2001. Sustainable urban drainage systems-best practice manual. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London.
16. Clarke, S.M. 2004. Confidence in geological interpretation. A methodology for evaluating uncertainty in common two-and three-dimensional representations of subsurface geology. British Geological Survey Internal Report, IR/04/164.
17. Communities and Local Government 2006. Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk. Full Regulatory Impact Assessment. Communities and Local Government Publications, London.
18. Culshaw, M.G. 2003. Bridging the gap between geoscience providers and the user community. In: Rosenbaum, M.S. & Turner, A.K. (eds) New Paradigms in Subsurface Prediction, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, 99, 7-26.
19. Culshaw, M.G. 2005. From concept towards reality: developing the attributed 3D model of the shallow subsurface. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 38(3), 231-284.
20. Culshaw, M.G. & Ellison, R.A. 2002. Geological maps: their importance in a user-driven digital age. In: Van Roony, J.L. & Jermy, C.A. (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment Congress, Durban, 16-20 September 2002, Keynote Lectures and Extended Abstracts Volume. South African Institute of Engineering and Environmental Geologists, Pretoria, 25-51.
21. Culshaw, M.G., Forster, A. & Northmore, K.J. 1994. Environmental geology maps for urban Britain-their relevance to less developed countries. In: Wang, S. & Wang, C. (eds) Proceedings of LANDPLAN IV. China Ocean Press, Beijing, 373-386.
22. Culshaw, M.G., Nathanial, C.P. et al. 2006. The role of web-based environmental information in urban planning-the environmental information system for planners. Science of the Total Environment, 360, 233-245.
23. De Mulder, E.F.L. 1988. Thematic applied Quaternary maps-a profitable investment or expensive wallpaper? In: De Mulder, E.F.L. & Hageman, B.P. (eds) Applied Quaternary Geology. Balkema, Rotterdam, 105-117.
24. Department for Communities and Local Government. 2006. Planning Policy Statement 9: Biodiversity and Geological Conservation. Final Regulatory Impact Assessment. DCLG Publications, London.
25. Dimmock, P.S. & Mair, R.J. 2007. Volume loss experienced on open-face London Clay tunnels. Geotechnical Engineering, 160, 3-11.
26. Dochartaigh, B.E., Ball, D.F. Macdonald, A.M. Lilly, A. Fitzsimons, V. Del Rio, M. & Auton, C.A. 2005. Mapping groundwater vulnerability in Scotland: a new approach for the Water Framework Directive. Scottish Journal of Geology, 41, 21-30.
27. Doornkamp, J.C. 1995. Perception and reality in the provision of insurance against natural perils in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20, 68-80.
28. Ellison, R.A., Arrick, A. Strange, P.J. & Hennessey, C. 1998. Earth science information in support of major development initiatives. British Geological Survey Technical Report, WA/97/84.
29. Ellison, R.A., McMillan, A.A. & Lott, G.K. 2002. Ground characterization of the urban environment: a guide to best practice. British Geological Survey Internal Report, IR/02/044.
30. Ellison, R.A., Woods, M.A. Allen, D.J. Forster, A. Pharoah, T.G. & King, C. 2004. Geology of London. British Geological Survey, Keyworth.
31. Forster, A. 1999. The engineering geology of the London area: 1:50 000 geological sheets 256, 257, 270 and 271 British Geological Survey, Engineering Geology Series, Technical Report, WN/97/27.
32. Hack, R., Orlic, B. Ozmutlu, S. & Rengers, N. 2006. Three and more dimensional modelling in geo-engineering. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 65, 143-153.
33. Hight, D.W. & Jardine, R.J. 1993. Small strain stiffness and strength characteristics of hard London Tertiary clays. Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks, 1, 533-552.
34. Hinze, C., Sobisch, H.-G. & Voss, H.-H. 1999. Spatial modelling in geology and its practical use. Mathematische Geologie, 4, 51-60.
35. Howland, A.F. 2000. The history of the development of procedure for the rapid assessment of environmental conditions to aid the urban regeneration process at London Docklands. Engineering Geology, 60, 117-125.
36. Hutchinson, H. 1965. A survey of the coastal landslides of Essex and South Suffolk. Building Research Station Note, EN/36/65.
37. Jackson, C.R. 2001. The development and validation of the object-oriented quasi three-dimensional regional groundwater model ZOOMQ3D. British Geological Survey Internal Report, IR/01/144.
38. Jackson, I. 2004. Britain beneath our feet. British Geological Survey Occasional Publications, 4, 114.
39. Kaalberg, F., Haasnoot, J. & Netzel, H. 2003. What are the end-user issues? Settlement risk management in underground construction. In: Rosenbaum, M.S. & Turner, A.K. (eds) New Paradigms in Subsurface Prediction, Lecture notes in Earth Sciences, 99, 69-84.
40. Kessler, H. & Mathers, S. 2004. Maps to models. Geoscientist, 14, 4-6.
41. Lawrence, D.J.D., Arkley, S. et al. 2007. Northumberland National Park: Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan. British Geological Survey Report, CR/07/037N.
42. Lelliott, M.R., Bridge, D.M. Kesslar, H. Price, S.J. & Seymour, K.J. 2006. The application of 3D geological modelling to aquifer recharge assessments in an urban environment. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 39, 293-302.
43. Marker, B.R. 1998. Incorporation of information on geohazards into the planning process. In: Maund, J.G. & Eddleston, M. (eds) Geohazards in Engineering Geology, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 15, 385-389.
44. Mayor of London. 2004. The London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London. Greater London Authority, London.
45. McKirdy, A.P., Thompson, A. & Poole, J. 1998. Dissemination of information on the earth sciences to planners and other decision-makers. In: Bennett, M.R. & Doyle, P. (eds) Issues in Environmental Geology: a British Perspective. Geological Society, London.
46. McMillan, A.A., Heathcote, J.A. Klink, B.A. Shepley, M.G. Jackson, C.P. & Degnan, P.J. 2000. Hydrogeological characterisation of the onshore Quaternary sediments at Sellafield using the concept of domains. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 33, 301-323.
47. Nickless, E.F.P. 1982. Environmental geology of the Glenrothes district, Fife region. Description of 1:25 000 sheet NO 20. Institute of Geological Sciences Reports, 82, 15.
48. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2003. Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
49. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. Planning Policy Statement 23: Planning and Pollution Control. HMSO, London.
50. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister & Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2004. Creating Sustainable Communities: Greening the Gateway. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
51. Paul, T., Chow, F. & Kjekstad, O. 2002. Hidden Aspects of Urban Planning-Surface and Underground Development. Thomas Telford, London.
52. Royse, K.R., Price, S. Entwisle, D. Lelliott, M. & Terrington, R. 2005. Thames Gateway Pilot Study, Results: Is there a need for Urban Geoscience in the Gateway? British Geological Survey Report, IR/05/063, 34.
53. Site Investigation Steering Group. 1993. Without site investigation ground is a hazard. Site Investigation in Construction. Thomas Telford, London, 56.
54. Smith, A. & Ellison, R.A. 1999. Applied geological maps for planning and development: a review of examples from England and Wales, 1983 to 1996. Quaternary Journal of Engineering Geology, 32, S1-S44.
55. Sobisch, H.-G. 2000. Ein difitles raeumliches Modell des Quartaers der GK25 Blatt 3508 Nordhorn auf der Basis vernetzer Profilschnitte. Shaker, Aachen.
56. Steadman, E.J., Mitchell, P. Highley, D.E. Harrison, D.J. Linley, K.A. Macfarlane, M. & McEvoy, F.M. 2004. Strategic environmental assessment (sea) and future aggregate extraction: in the East Midlands region. British Geological Survey Report, CR/04/003N.
57. Strange, P.J., Booth, S.J. & Ellison, R.A. 1998. Development of 'rockhead' computer-generated geological models to assist geohazard prediction in London. In: Maund, J.G. & Eddleston, M. (eds) Geohazards in Engineering Geology, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 15, 409-414.
58. Thompson, A., Hine, P.D. Grief, J.R. & Poole, J.S. 1998. Environmental Geology in Land Use and Planning: Advice for Planners and Developers. Report to the Department of the Environment.
59. Turner, A.K. 2003. Putting the user first: implications for subsurface characterisation. In: Rosenbaum, M.S. & Turner, A.K. (eds) New Paradigms in Subsurface Prediction, 99, 61-83, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences.
60. Turner, A.K. 2006. Challenges and trends for geological modelling and visualisation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 65, 109-127.