Complications and clinical outcome 18 months after bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1043-1049

  Fagerström, Tim ^a   Nyman, Claes R ^a   Hahn, Robert G ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA STRICTURE;

AGED; CATHETERIZATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT READMISSION; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; TIME FACTORS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINATION;

EID: 79959317097     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0714     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ho H, Yip S, Foo KT. Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in saline: Preliminary report on clinical efficacy and safety at 1 year. J Endourol 2006;20:244-247.
2. Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: Results of a randomized trial with a 2-year followup. BJU Int 2010;106:1339-1343.
3. Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Akduman B, et al. A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 2006;76:139-143. (Pubitemid 43872563)
4. Ekengren J, Hahn RG. Blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate as measured with the HemoCue photometer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993;27:501-507. (Pubitemid 24005454)
5. Hahn RG, Sandfeldt L, Nyman CR. Double-blind randomized study of symptoms associated with absorption of glycine 1.5% or mannitol 3% during transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1998;160:397-401. (Pubitemid 29476686)
6. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: Randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2005;19:333-338. (Pubitemid 40656308)
7. Starkman JS, Santucci RA. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: Shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 2005;95:69-71. (Pubitemid 350020872)
8. Yang S, Lin WC, Chang HK, et al. Gyrus plasmasect: Is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate? Urol Int 2004;73:258-261.
9. Fagerström T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique: A single-centre randomized trial of 202 patients. BJU Int 2010;105:1560-1564.
10. Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, et al. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 2004;46:547-554. (Pubitemid 39345720)
11. Hahn RG. Ethanol monitoring of irrigating fluid absorption (review). Eur J Anaesth 1996;13:102-115. (Pubitemid 26093262)
12. Hahn RG. Calculation of irrigant absorption by measurement of breath alcohol level during transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1991;68:390-393.
13. Jansen H, Berseus O, Johansson JE. A simple photometric method for determination of blood loss during transurethral surgery. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1978;12:1-5. (Pubitemid 8281967)
14. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Stock C, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate - technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007;16:11-21. (Pubitemid 46322910)
15. Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, de la Rosette JJ. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol 2009;56:798-809.
16. Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, et al. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: A prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 2005;174:1339-1343. (Pubitemid 41318724)
17. Hon NH, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prostate: Physiological changes, early complications and long-term follow up. J Urol 2006;17:205-209. (Pubitemid 43815366)
18. Geavlete B, Multescu R, Dragutescu M, et al. Transurethral resection (TUR) in saline plasma vaporization of the prostate vs standard TUR of the prostate: "the better choice" in benign prostatic hyperplasia? BJU Int 2010;106:1695-1699.
19. Yoon CJ, Kim JY, Moon KH, et al. Transurethral resection of the prostate with a bipolar tissue management system compared to conventional monopolar resectoscope: Oneyear outcome. Yonsei Med J 2006;47:715-720.
20. Michielsen DP, Coomans D, Peeters I, et al. Conventional monopolar resection or bipolar resection in saline for the management of large (> 60 g) benign prostatic hyperplasia: An evaluation of morbidity. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2010;19:207-213.
21. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) - Incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 2006;50:969-979.
22. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, et al. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 2010;58:384-397.
23. Autorino R, Damiano R, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 2009;55:922-929.
24. de Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A randomized prospective trial. Urology 2006;67:69-72. (Pubitemid 43069258)
25. Michielsen DP, Coomans D, Braeckman JG, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline: The solution to avoid hyponatraemia and transurethral resection syndrome. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2010;44:228-235.
26. Faul P, Schlenker B, Gratzke C, et al. Clinical and technical aspects of bipolar transurethral prostate resection [Review]. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008;42:318-323.
27. Williams EL, Hildebrand KL, McCormick SA, et al. The effect of intravenous lactated Ringer's solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human volunteers. Anest Analg 1999;88:999-1003. (Pubitemid 29211528)
28. Wilkes NJ, Woolf R, Mutch M, et al. The effect of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:811-816. (Pubitemid 32905960)
29. Arieff AI. Fatal postoperative pulmonary edema: Pathogenesis and literature review. Chest 1999;115:1371-1377. (Pubitemid 29230649)
30. Hahn RG, Nennesmo I, Rajs J, et al. Morphological and x-ray microanalytical changes in mammalian tissue after overhydration with irrigation fluids. Eur Urol 1996;29:355-361. (Pubitemid 26134026)
31. Olsson J, Hahn RG. Glycine toxicity after high-dose i.v. infusion of glycine 1.5% in the mouse. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:250-254. (Pubitemid 29057625)
32. Michielsen DP, Coomans D. Urethral strictures and bipolar transurethral resection in saline of the prostate: Fact or fiction? J Endourol 2010;24:1333-1337.