Influence control for dynamic reconfiguration of data flow systems

Journal of Software

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1-13

  Li, Wei ^a   Zhao, Zhikun ^a  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Data flow; Dynamic reconfiguration; Influence control

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DATA TRANSFER; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK (RDF); SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS;

DATA FLOW MODELING; DATA FLOW SYSTEMS; DATAFLOW; DYNAMIC RE-CONFIGURATION; INFLUENCE CONTROLS; PERFORMANCE; PLANNING ALGORITHMS; RECONFIGURABLE; RECONFIGURATION PLANNING; SCHEDULING POLICIES;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

EID: 79959306702     PISSN: 1796217X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4304/jsw.2.6.1-13     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. C. Adams, S. Lloyd, "Understanding Public-key Infrastructure", Macmillan Technical Publishing, 1999.
2. S. Ajmani, B. Liskov, and L. Shrira, "Scheduling and Simulation: How to Upgrade Distributed Systems" in 9th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOSIX), Hawaii, USA, 2003, pp.43-48.
3. T. Bures, P. Hnetynka, F. Plasil, "SOFA 2.0: Balancing Advanced Features in a Hierarchical Component Model" in 4th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA'06), Seattle, USA, 2006, pp. 40-48.
4. G. Cheng, "A Dataflow-Based Software Integration Model in Parallel and Distributed Computing and Applications", Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, Italy, 1997.
5. P. Feiler, J. Li, "Consistency in Dynamic Reconfiguration" in 4th International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, Annapolis, USA, 1998, pp.189-196.
6. J. Gorinsek, S. Van Baelen, Y. Berbers and K. De Vlaminck, "Managing Quality of Service during Evolution using Component Contracts" in ETAPS 2003 Workshop on Unanticipated Software Evolution (USE2003), Warsaw, Poland, 2003, pp.57-62.
7. J. Hillman, I. Warren, "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Reconfiguration Algorithms" in International Conference on Design, Analysis and Simulation of Distributed (DASD) Systems, Virginia, USA, 2004.
8. J. Kramer, J. Magee, "The evolving philosophers problem: Dynamic change management" in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 16, 1990, pp.1293-1306.
9. S. Kulkarni and K. Biyani, "Correctness of Componentbased Adaptation" in International Symposium on Component-based Software Engineering, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2004, pp.48-58.
10. K.K. Lau and Z. Wang, "A taxonomy of software component models" in 31st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Porto, Portugal, 2005, pp.88-95.
11. N. Medvidovic and R.N. Taylor, "A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages" in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1), 2000, pp.70-93.
12. S.R. Mitchell, "Dynamic Configuration of Distributed Multimedia Components", PhD thesis, University of London, UK, 2000.
13. W.A. Najjar et al, "Advances in the Dataflow Computational Model" in Parallel Computing, 25(13-14) 1999, pp.1907-1929.
14. A. Naveed, et al., "Deployment and Dynamic Reconfiguration Planning for Distributed Software Systems" in 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'03), Sacramento, USA, 2003, pp.39-46.
15. N.D. Palma, P. Laumay, and L. Bellissard, "Ensuring Dynamic Reconfiguration Consistency" in 6th International Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming (WCOP 2001), Budapest, Hungary, 2001.
16. I. Warren, "A Model for Dynamic Configuration which Preserves Application Integrity", PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK. 2000.
17. M. Wegdam, "Dynamic Reconfiguration and Load Distribution in Component Middleware", PhD thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands, 2003.
18. Z. Zhao and W. Li, "Influence Control for Dynamic Reconfiguration" in Australian Software Engineering Conference 2007, Melbourne, Australia, 2007, pp.59-68.