Lattice-based approach to building templates for natural language understanding in intelligent tutoring systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6738 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 47-54

  Devasani, Shrenik ^a   Aist, Gregory ^a   Blessing, Stephen B ^b   Gilbert, Stephen ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA   (United States)

Author keywords

authoring tool; intelligent tutoring system; natural language processing

Indexed keywords

AUTHORING TOOL; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; JUST IN TIME; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 79959306353     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H., LaVancher, C.: Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding. Cognitive Science 18, 439-477 (1994).
2. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R.: Self-explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science 13, 145-182 (1989).
3. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K., Cross, K.: Tutoring Answer Explanations Fosters Learning With Understanding. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 1999, pp. 199-206 (1999).
4. Glass, M.: Processing Language Input in the CIRCSIM-Tutor Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Moore, J.D., et al. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 210-221 (2001).
5. Rus, V., Graesser, A.: Deeper Natural Language Processing for Evaluating Student Answers in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (2006).
6. Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N.: TRG.: Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Evaluate the Contributions of Students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environemnts, 149-169 (2000).
7. Steinhart, D.: Summary Street: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Improving Student Writing Through the Use of Latent Semantic Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder (2001).
8. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259-284 (1998).
9. Blessing, S., Gilbert, S., Blankenship, L., Sanghvi, B.: From SDK to xPST: A New Way to Overlay a Tutor on Existing Software. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International FLAIRS Conference (2009).
10. Maass, J., Blessing, S.B.: xSTAT: An Intelligent Homework Helper for Students. Poster presented at the Georgia Undergraduate Research in Psychology Conference (2011).
11. Gilbert, S., Blessing, S.B., Kodavali, S.: The Extensible Problem-Specific Tutor (xPST): Evaluation of an API for Tutoring on Existing Interfaces. In: Dimitrova, V., et al. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 707-709. IOS Press, Brighton (2006)