A teachable-agent arithmetic game's effects on mathematics understanding, attitude and self-efficacy

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6738 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 247-255

  Pareto, Lena ^a   Arvemo, Tobias ^a   Dahl, Ylva ^b   Haake, Magnus ^c   Gulz, Agneta ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY WEST   (Sweden)

^b Uddevalla Schools   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY COGNITIVE SCIENCE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

attitude; mathematics achievement; self efficacy; teachable agents

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CONTROL GROUPS; EDUCATIONAL GAME; SELF EFFICACY; SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; STUDY DESIGN; TEACHABLE AGENTS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79959305294     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Rieber, L.P.: Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development 44(2), 43-58 (1996).
2. Schwartz, D.L., Martin, T.: Inventing to Prepare for Learning: the Hidden Efficiency of Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction. Cognition and Instruction 22, 129-184 (2004). (Pubitemid 38808943)
3. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Role of guidance, reflection and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology 97(1), 117-128 (2005). (Pubitemid 40345920)
4. Vogel, J.F., Vogel, D.S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C.A., Muse, K., Wright, M.: Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 34(3), 229-243 (2006).
5. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., Bai, H.: The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Comp. & Education 55, 427-443 (2010).
6. Ke, F.: Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structure: cognitive, metacognitive and affective evaluation. Educational Teachnology Research Development 56, 539-556 (2008).
7. Bos, B.: Virtual math objects with pedagogical, mathematical, and cognitive fidelity. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 521-528 (2009).
8. Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Brandford, J., Schwartz, D.L., TAG-V.: Extending intelligent learning environments with teachable agents to enhance learning. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C.L., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 389-397 (2001).
9. Schwartz, D.L., Chase, C., Wagster, J., Okita, S., Roscoe, R., Chin, D., Biswas, G.: Interactive Metacognition: Monitoring and Regulating a Teachable Agent. In: Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Handbook of Metacognition in Education (2009).
10. McLeod, D.B.: Research on Affect and Mathematics Learning in the JRME: 1970 to the Present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25(6), 637-647 (1994).
11. Ma, X., Kishor, N.: Attitude Toward Self, Social Factors, and Achievement in Mathematics: A Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review 9(2), 2 (1997).
12. Pajares, F., Graham, L.: Self-Efficacy, Motivation Constructs, and Mathematics Performance of Entering Middle School Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 24, 124-139 (1999).
13. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: The Foundation of Agency. L. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000).
14. Moores, T.T., Chang, J.C.-J., Smith, D.K.: Clarifying the role of self-efficacy and metacognition as predictors of performance: construct development and test. SIGMIS Database 37(2-3), 125-132 (2006).
15. Frenzel, A.C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T.: Perceived learning environment and students' emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction 17, 478-493 (2007).
16. Ke, F., Grabowski, B.: Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology 38(3), 249-259 (2007). (Pubitemid 46325307)
17. Sedig, K.: Toward operationalization of 'flow' in mathematics Learnware. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 2064-2092 (2007). (Pubitemid 46176535)
18. Pareto, L., Schwartz, D.L., Svensson, L.: Learning by guiding a teachable agent to play an educational game. In: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 662-664. IOS press, Amsterdam (2009).
19. Nilsson, A., Pareto, L.: The Complexity of Integrating Technology Enhanced Learning in Special Math Education-A Case Study. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 638-643. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
20. Mayer, R.E.: Should there Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. Educational Psychologist 59, 14-19 (2004). (Pubitemid 38161472)
21. Middleton, J.A., Spanias, P.A.: Motivation for Achievement in Mathematics: Findings, Generalizations, and Criticisms of the Research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(1), 65-88 (1999)