A single institute's experience in retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Results with 86 consecutive patients

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 999-1003

  Martina, Giorgio R ^a   Verze, Paolo ^b   Giummelli, Pierluigi ^a   Scuzzarella, Salvatore ^a   Cantoni, Federico ^a   Caruso, Giacomo ^a   Remotti, Marco ^a   Mirone, Vincenzo G ^b  

^a Ospedale di Sondalo   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959290805     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0683     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson - Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001;87:287-289.
2. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-1799. (Pubitemid 24350801)
3. Chuanyu S, Guowei X, Ke X, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases). Urology 2009;74 1036-1040.
4. Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM. Singlecenter comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2003;17:155-60. (Pubitemid 36529557)
5. Dong J, Wong J, Al-Enezi A, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The updated McMaster University experience. Can Urol Assoc J 2008;2:388-391.
6. Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, et al. Adult endopyelotomy: Impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome. J Urol 1998;160:685-689. (Pubitemid 29479487)
7. Ponsky LE, Streem SB. Retrograde endopyelotomy: A comparative study of hot-wire balloon and ureteroscopic laser. J Endourol 2006;20:823-826. (Pubitemid 44736264)
8. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692-695. (Pubitemid 29436851)
9. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44:340-345. (Pubitemid 37051703)
10. Shoma AM, El Nahas AR, Bazeed MA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 2007;178:2020-2024. (Pubitemid 47538604)
11. Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX Jr. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2005;48:973-977. (Pubitemid 41641648)
12. Hemal AK, Goel R, Goel A. Cost effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Single center experience. Int J Urol 2003;10:563-568. (Pubitemid 37506129)
13. Moore RG, Averch TD, Schulam PG, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Experience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol 1997;157:459-462. (Pubitemid 27026816)
14. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256. (Pubitemid 34132065)