Technological literacy as network building

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 274-302

  Swarts, Jason ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959287711     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2011.578239     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. krich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Augé, M. (1995). Non places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). London: Verso.
4. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books.
5. Cargile Cook, K. (2002). Layered literacies: A theoretical frame for technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11, 5-29.doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1101_1
6. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. San Francisco: Wiley-Blackwell.
7. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Clarke, J. (2008). Assembling "skills for life": Actor-network theory and the new literacy studies. In M. Prinsloo & M. Baynham (Eds.), Literacies, global and local (pp. 151-169). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Diehl, A., Grabill, J. T., Hart-Davidson, W., & Iyer, V. (2008). Grassroots: Supporting the knowledge work of everyday life. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 413-435. doi: 10.1080/10572250802324937
10. Drucker, P. F. (2001). A century of social transformation-Emergence of knowledge society. The essential Drucker (pp. 299-320). New York: HarperCollins.
11. Gee, J. P. (2008). Learning in semiotic domains: A social and situated account. In M. Prinsloo & M. Baynham (Eds.), Literacies, global and local (pp. 137-150). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Geisler, C. (2003). Analyzing streams of language: Twelve steps to the systematic coding of text, talk, and other verbal data. New York: Longman.
13. Grabill, J. (2008). Making things: Rhetoric and community change. Presentation at the Rhetoric Society of America Conference, Seattle, WA.
14. Grabill, J. T., & Hicks, T. (2005). Multiliteracies meet methods: The case for digital writing in English education. English Education, 37, 301-311.
15. Gurak, L. J. (2001). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Hart-Davidson, B. (2005). Shaping texts that transform: Toward a rhetoric of objects, relationships, and views. In C. Lipson & M. Day (Eds.), Technical Communication and the World Wide Web (pp. 27-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 428-444). New York: Sage.
19. Johnson-Eilola, J. (1996). Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5, 245-270.
20. Johnson-Eilola, J. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. Kim, L., & Tolley, C. (2004). Fitting academic programs to workplace marketability: Career paths of five technical communicators. Technical Communication, 51, 376-386.
22. Lanier, C. R. (2009). Analysis of the skills called for by technical communication employers in recruitment postings. Technical Communication, 56(1), 51-61.
23. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power technology and domination (pp. 103-132). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Latour, B. (1993). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of the door-closer. In S. L. Star (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology (pp. 257-277). Albany: State University of New York Press.
27. Latour, B. (1999). A collective of humans and nonhumans: Following Daedalus's labyrinth. In B. Latour (Ed.), Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies (pp. 174-215). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5, 379-393.doi: 10.1007/BF01059830
30. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.
31. Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 21-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Lee, C. P., Dourish, P., & Mark, G. (2006). The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 483-492.doi: 10.1145/1180875.1180950
33. Martin, M., & O'Sullivan, R. (2007). The case for "technical communicator." Retrieved from http://www.stc.org/PDF_Files/caseTC.pdf
34. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35. Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24, 641-671.
36. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An introduction. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 1-22). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37. Moore, A. H. (2007). The new economy, technology, and learning outcomes assessment. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(2), 6-8. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/TheNewEconomyTechnologyandLear/161826
38. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205-242. doi: 10.1023/A:1015241914483
39. Rainey, K. T., Turner, R. K., & Dayton, D. (2005). Do curricula in technical communication jibe with managerial expectations? A report about core competencies. Proceedings from the IEEE Professional Communication Conference, 359-368. doi: 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494198
40. Rice, J. (2009). Woodward paths: Motorizing space. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 224-241.doi: 10.1080/10572250902942000
41. Rude, C. D. (1995). The report for decision making. Journal of Business and Technical ommunication, 9, 170-205.doi: 10.1177/1050651995009002002
42. Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
43. Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
44. Spafford, M. M., Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., & Mian, M. (2010). Accessibility and order: Crossing borders in child abuse forensic reports. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19, 118-143.doi: 10.1080/10572250903559324
45. Spinuzzi, C. (2007). Guest editor's introduction: Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 265-277.doi: 10.1080/ 10572250701290998
46. Spinuzzi, C. (2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2000). Genre ecologies: An open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3),169-181.doi: 10.1145/344599.344646
48. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum Of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
49. Vincent, D. (1989). Literacy and popular culture: England 1750-1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. WestEd. (2010, February). Technological literacy framework for the 2012 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: The National Assessment Governing Board. Retrieved from http://www.edgateway.net/cs/naepsci/print/docs/470
51. Whiteside, A. L. (2003). The skills that technical communicators need: An investigation of technical communication graduates, managers, and curricula. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33, 303-318. doi: 10.2190/3164-E4V0-BF7D-TDVA
52. Winsor, D. A. (2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 5-28. doi: 10.1177/105065190101500101
53. Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.