Bayesian change detection based on spatial sampling and Gaussian mixture model

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1635-1642

  Çelik, Turgay ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Bayesian inferencing; Binary thresholding; Change detection; Difference image; Gaussian mixture model; Log ratio image

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN INFERENCING; CHANGE DETECTION; DIFFERENCE IMAGE; GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODEL; LOG-RATIO IMAGES; THRESHOLDING;

FACE RECOGNITION; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; PIXELS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 79959277603     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A. Baraldi Impact of radiometric calibration and specifications of spaceborne optical imaging sensors on the development of operational automatic remote sensing image understanding systems IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observation Remote Sens. 2 2 2009 104 134
2. Y. Bazi, L. Bruzzone, and F. Melgani An unsupervised approach based on the generalized Gaussian model to automatic change detection in multitemporal sar images IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 4 2005 874 887
3. F. Bovolo, and L. Bruzzone A detail-preserving scale-driven approach to change detection in multitemporal sar images IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 12 2005 2963 2972 (Pubitemid 41788560)
4. L. Bruzzone, and D. Prieto Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38 3 2000 1171 1182
5. T. CÇelik Multiscale change detection in multitemporal satellite images IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 6 4 2009 820 824
6. T. CÇelik Unsupervised change detection in satellite images using principal component analysis and k-means clustering IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 6 4 2009 772 776
7. T. CÇelik Change detection in satellite images using a genetic algorithm approach IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 7 2 2010 386 390
8. T. CÇelik, and K.-K. Ma Unsupervised change detection for satellite images using dual-tree complex wavelet transform IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 48 3 2010 1199 1210
9. M. Dinguirard, and P.N. Slater Calibration of space-multispectral imaging sensors: a review Remote Sens. Environ. 68 3 1999 194 205 (Pubitemid 29294388)
10. M. Figueiredo, and A. Jain Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 24 3 2002 381 396 (Pubitemid 35289353)
11. B.-C. Gao, M.J. Montes, C.O. Davis, and A.F. Goetz Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean Remote Sens. Environ. 113 Supplement 1 2009 S17 S24 Imaging Spectroscopy Special Issue
12. T. Kim, and Y.-J. Im Automatic satellite image registration by combination of matching and random sample consensus IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41 5 2003 1111 1117
13. S. Leprince, S. Barbot, F. Ayoub, and J.-P. Avouac Automatic and precise orthorectification, coregistration, and subpixel correlation of satellite images, application to ground deformation measurements IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45 6 2007 1529 1558 (Pubitemid 46853269)
14. NASA.; 2011. Landsat images of Alaska. URL .
15. R.A. Redner, and H.F. Walker Mixture densities maximum likelihood and the em algorithm SIAM Rev. 26 2 1984 195 239
16. D. Schlapfer, and R. Richter Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data - Part 1: Parametric orthorectification Int. J. Remote Sens. 23 2002 2609 2630 (Pubitemid 34817285)
17. D. Schlapfer, and R. Richter Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data - Part 2: Atmospheric/topographic correction Int. J. Remote Sens. 23 13 2002 2631 2649 (Pubitemid 34817286)
18. E. Sertel, S.H. Kutoglu, and S. Kaya Geometric correction accuracy of different satellite sensor images: application of figure condition Int. J. Remote Sens. 28 2007 4685 4692 (Pubitemid 47471122)
19. H. Xie, L. Pierce, and F. Ulaby SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40 10 2002 2196 2212