Age of diagnosis, tumor size, and survival after breast cancer: Implications for mammographic screening

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 259-266

  Narod, Steven A ^a,b  

^a WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Prognostic factors; Survivorship

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PALPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PALPATION; PROGNOSIS; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 79959257803     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1318-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AB Miller CJ Baines T To C Wall 1992 Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years CMAJ 147 1459 1476 1423087 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FksFyqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23008476)
2. AB Miller CJ Baines T To C Wall 1992 Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years CMAJ 147 1477 1488 1423088 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FksFyquw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23008477)
3. L Nyström LE Rutqvist S Wall A Lindgren M Lindqvist S Rydén I Andersson N Bjurstam G Fagerberg J Frisell, et al. 1993 Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials Lancet 341 973 978 8096941 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-V (Pubitemid 23109165)
4. Nystrom L, Wall S, Rutqvist I et al (1997) Pdate of the overview of the Swedish randomised trials on breast cancer screening with mammography. NIH consensus development conference. Breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49. NIH Press, Bethesda, pp 65-69
5. WD Foulkes JS Reis-Filho SA Narod 2010 Size and survival in breast cancer: a reappraisal Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7 348 353 20309006 10.1038/nrclinonc. 2010.39 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmslGgsb4%3D
6. EA Rakha JS Resios-Filho IO Ellis 2008 Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review J Clin Oncol 26 2568 2581 18487574 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1748
7. R Dent WM Hanna KI Pritchard, et al. 2007 Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence Clin Cancer Res 13 4429 4434 17671126 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045 (Pubitemid 47219710)
8. R Dent WM Hanna M Trudeau E Rawlinson P Sun P Narod 2009 Time to disease recurrence in basal type breast cancers: effects of tumor size and lymph node status Cancer 115 4917 4923 19691094 10.1002/cncr.24573
9. WD Foulkes M Grainge EA Rakha AR Green IO Ellis 2008 Tumor size is an unreliable predictor of prognosis in basal-like cancers and does not correlate closely with lymph node status Breast Cancer Res Treat 117 199 204 18600446 10.1007/s10549-008-0102-6
10. AJ Evans EA Rakha SE Pinder AR Green C Paish IO Ellis 2007 Basal phenotype: a powerful prognostic factor in small screen-detected invasive breast cancer with long-tem follow up J Med Screen 14 210 214 18078567 10.1258/096914107782912004 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjksVehuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 350223786)
11. WD Foulkes K Metcalfe W Hanna, et al. 2003 Disruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1-related breast carcinoma Cancer 98 1567 1569 10.1002/cncr.11688 (Pubitemid 37238611)
12. G Rennert S Busland-Naggan O Barnett-Griness, et al. 2007 Clinical outcomes of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations N Engl J Med 357 115 123 17625123 10.1056/NEJMoa070608 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXns12qsrk%3D (Pubitemid 47057729)
13. AM Gonzalez-Angulo JK Litton KR Broglio F Meric-Bernstam R Rakkhit F Cardoso F Peintinger EO Hanrahan A Sahin M Guray D Larsimont F Feoli H Stranzl TA Buchholz V Valero R Theriault M Piccart-Gebhart PM Ravdin DA Berry GN Hortobagyi 2009 High risk of recurrence for patients with breast cancer who have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, node-negative tumors 1 cm or smaller J Clin Oncol 27 5700 5706 19884543 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2025
14. CL Carter C Allen DE Henson 1989 Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases Cancer 63 181 187 2910416 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FovFCqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19032001)
15. WD Foulkes IM Stefansson PO Chappuis LR Bégin JR Goffin N Wong M Trudel LA Akslen 2003 Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 95 19 1482 1485 14519755 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnvVCjtrk%3D (Pubitemid 37279334)
16. SR Young RT Pilarski T Donenberg C Shapiro LS Hammond J Miller KA Brooks S Cohen B Tenenholz D Desai I Zandvakili R Royer S Li SA Narod 2009 The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer BMC Cancer 9 86 19298662 10.1186/1471-2407-9-86 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1MXjvVSitLg%3D
17. LA Carey CM Perou CA Livasay, et al. 2006 Race, breast cancer subtype and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study JAMA 295 2492 2502 16757721 10.1001/jama.295.21.2492 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlsV2rtLw%3D (Pubitemid 43854964)
18. SA Narod 1997 On being the right size: a reappraisal of mammography trials in Canada and Sweden Lancet 349 1856 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61736-9
19. L Tabar S Duffy B Vitak H-H Chen TC Prevost 1999 The natural history of breast carcinoma. What have we learned from screening? Cancer 86 449 462 10430253 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<449::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-Q 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzlslehsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29347407)
20. T Sorlie CM Perou R Tibshirani, et al. 2001 Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 10869 10874 11553815 10.1073/pnas.191367098 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXntVGmsbo%3D (Pubitemid 32878711)
21. P-H Zahl J Moehlen HG Welch 2008 The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography Arch Intern Med 168 2311 2316 19029493 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311
22. HG Welch 2009 Over diagnosis and mammography screening Br Med J 339 182 183 10.1136/bmj.b1425
23. DB Thomas DL Gao MR Ray, et al. 2002 Randomised trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results Natl Cancer Inst 94 19 1445 1457 (Pubitemid 35243743)