Qualitative research for international business

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 582-590

  Doz, Yves ^a  

^a INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

international business research agenda; qualitative research; research methods; theory building

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959250743     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2011.18     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Aguilar, F. J. 1973. Daag Europe, Harvard Business School Case 9-374-037.
2. Aharoni, Y. 1966. The foreign investment decision process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Allison, G. 1971. Essence ofdecision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
4. Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
5. Axelrod, R. 1997. The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Bartlett, C. 1979. Multinationalstructuralevolution: Thechanging decision environment in international divisions, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
7. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Bower, J. L. 1970. Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
9. Brannen, M. Y., & Peterson, M. 2009. Merging without alienating: Interventions promoting cross-cultural organizational integration and their limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3): 468-489.
10. Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 1-34. (Pubitemid 127172357)
11. Buckley, P.J. 2002. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365-373.
12. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 2009. The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1563-1580.
13. Buckley, P. J., & Lessard, D. R. 2005. Regaining the edge for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 595-599. (Pubitemid 41655849)
14. Burgelman, R. 1994. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 24-56.
15. Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history ofindustrialenterprise. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
16. Cheng,J. L. C. 2007. Critical issues in international management research: An agenda forfuture advancement. European Journal of International Management, 1(1/2): 23-38.
17. Christensen, C. 1997. The innovators' dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
18. DiMaggio, P. 1995. Comments on "what theory is not". Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 391-397.
19. Dore, 1973. British factory-Japanese factory: The origins of national diversity in industrial relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20. Doz, Y. 1976. National policies and multinational management, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
21. Doz, Y. 2004. Toward a managerial theory of the MNC. Advances in International Management, 16: 3-30. (Pubitemid 39753616)
22. Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. K. 1991. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1): 145-164.
23. Dubois, A., & Gibbert, M. 2010. From complexity to transpar-ency: Managing the interplay between theory, method and empirical phenomena in IMM case studies. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1): 129-136.
24. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
25. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. 1994. Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of Management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 91-112.
26. Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. 2010. The "what" and "how" of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4): 710-737.
27. Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13): 1465-1474.
28. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
29. Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Business and Management Series.
30. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of Knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23-32.
31. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625-645.
32. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 257-272.
33. Peng, M. 2004. Identifying the big question in international business research. Journal of Business Studies, 35(2): 99-108. (Pubitemid 38554235)
34. Pettigrew, A. 1973. Thepolitics oforganizationaldecision-making. London: Tavistock Press.
35. Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (Eds) 2010. Rethinking the case study in international business research. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
36. Piekkari, R., Welch, C., & Paavilainen, E. 2009. The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3): 567-589.
37. Poole, M., Van de Ven, A., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. 2000. Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Prahalad, C. K. 1975. The strategic process in a multinational corporation, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Busi-ness School, Boston, MA.
39. Pratt, M. 2009. For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5): 856-862.
40. Quinn, J. B. 1980. Strategies forchange: Logicalincrementalism. Homewood, IL: Irwin Press.
41. Rangan, S. 2009. The influence of macro structure on the foreign market performance of transnational firms: The value of IGO connections, export dependence, and immigration links. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2): 229-267.
42. Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 20-24.
43. Thomas, D., Brannen, M. Y., & Garcia, D. 2010. Bicultural individuals and intercultural effectiveness. European Journal of Cross-cultural Competence and Management, 1(4): 315-333.
44. Van de Ven, A. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizationalandsocialresearch. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
45. Van Maanen, J. 1988. Tales from the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Weick, K. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 516-531.
47. Weick, K. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4): 628-652.
48. Weick, K. 2007. The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 14-19.
49. Wilkins, M. 1970. The emergence of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from the colonial era to 1914. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Wilkins, M. 1974. The maturing of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from 1914 to 1970. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Wilkins, M. 1997. The conceptual domain of international business inquiry. In B. Tyne & D. Nigh (Eds), International business: An emerging vision. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
52. Yin, R. K. 1989. Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
53. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.