Differences in chemical composition and internal structure influence systemic host response to implants of biomaterials

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 422-431

  Scaglione, Silvia ^a,b   Cilli, Michele ^c   Fiorini, Mauro ^d   Quarto, Rodolfo ^a,e   Pennesi, Giuseppina ^a  

^a CENTRO DI BIOTECNOLOGIE AVANZATE   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^d FinCeramica Faenza SpA   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Foreign body response; Leukocyte; Lymphocyte; Monocyte; Scaffold

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; BLOOD; CELL ENGINEERING; CYTOLOGY; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE;

BIO-SCAFFOLDS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; COMPOSITION STRUCTURE; CYTOKINES; FOREIGN BODY RESPONSE; HOST RESPONSE; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; LEUCOCYTES; MONOCYTE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY;

CELLS;

BIOMATERIAL; CHEMOATTRACTANT; COLLAGEN; CYTOKINE; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYCAPROLACTONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE CONDUCTION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; HISTOLOGY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 79959242915     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/IJAO.2011.7747     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 1993; 260 (5110): 920-6. Medline. doi:10.1126/science.8493529
2. Langer RS, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering: the challenges ahead. Sci Am 1999; 280 (4): 86-9. Medline. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0499-86
3. Stock UA, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering: current state and prospects. Annu Rev Med 2001; 52: 443-51. Medline. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.443
4. Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Proc Am Philos Soc 2007; 151 (4): 395-402. Medline.
5. Boschetti F, Tomei AA, Turri S, Swartz MA, Levi M. Design, fabrication, and characterization of a composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs 2008; 31 (8): 697-707. Medline.
6. Brody S, Pandit A. Approaches to heart valve tissue engineering scaffold design. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 83 (1): 16-43. Medline. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30763
7. Cheng GX, Cai ZJ. (Nano-structured scaffold materials used in tissue engineering). Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 2002; 24 (2): 207-10. Medline.
8. Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2005; 4 (7): 518-24 Medline. doi:10.1038/nmat1421
9. Ingber DE, Mow VC, Butler D, et al. Tissue engineering and developmental biology: going biomimetic. Tissue Eng 2006; 12 (12): 3265-83. Medline. doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.3265
10. Mastrogiacomo M, Muraglia A, Komlev V, et al. Tissue engineering of bone: search for a better scaffold. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005; 8 (4): 277-84. Medline. doi:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00350.x
11. Park H, Radisic M, Lim JO, Chang BH, Vunjak-Novakovic G. A novel composite scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2005; 41 (7): 188-96. Medline. doi:10.1290/0411071.1
12. Raghunath J, Rollo J, Sales KM, Butler PE, Seifalian AM. Biomaterials and scaffold design: key to tissue-engineering cartilage. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2007; 46 (Pt 2): 73-84. Medline. doi:10.1042/BA20060134
13. Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL. Tissue engineering: the next generation. Tissue Eng 2006; 12 (12): 3261-63. Medline. doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.3261
14. Christenson EM, Dadsetan M, Hiltner A. Biostability and macrophage- mediated foreign body reaction of silicone-modified polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 74 (2): 141-55. Medline. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30317
15. Higgins DM, Basaraba RJ, Hohnbaum AC, Lee EJ, Grainger DW, Gonzalez-Juarrero M. Localized immunosuppressive environment in the foreign body response to implanted biomaterials. Am J Pathol 2009; 175 (1): 161-70. Medline. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080962
16. Hu WJ, Eaton JW, Ugarova TP, Tang L. Molecular basis of biomaterial- mediated foreign body reactions. Blood 2001; 98 (4): 1231-8. Medline. doi:10.1182/blood.V98.4.1231
17. Lypka M, Yamashita DD. Exuberant foreign body giant cell reaction to a teflon/proplast temporomandibular joint implant: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 (9): 1680-4. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.09.030
18. Rosner M, Edward DP, Tso MO. Foreign-body giant-cell reaction to the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110 (2): 173-4. Medline.
19. Rudolph CM, Soyer HP, Schuller-Petrovic S, Kerl H. Foreign body granulomas due to injectable aesthetic microimplants. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23 (1): 113-7. Medline. doi:10.1097/00000478-199901000-00013
20. Tasso R, Augello A, Carida' M, et al. Development of sarcomas in mice implanted with mesenchymal stem cells seeded onto bioscaffolds. Carcinogenesis 2009; 30 (1): 150-7. Medline. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgn234
21. Smith MJ, White KL Jr, Smith DC, Bowlin GL. In vitro evaluations of innate and acquired immune responses to electrospun polydioxanone-elastin blends. Biomaterials 2009; 30 (2): 149-159. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.019
22. Mastrogiacomo M, Scaglione S, Martinetti R, et al. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials. 2006;27(17):3230-3237. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.031
23. Gloria A, Russo T, De Santis R, Ambrosio L. 3D fiber deposition technique to make multifunctional and tailor-made scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2009;7(3):141-152. Medline.
24. Tampieri A, Sandri M, Landi E, et al. Design of graded biomimetic osteochondral composite scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008; 29 (26): 3539-46. Medline. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.008
25. Walschus U, Goldmann H, Ueberrueck T, Hoene A, Wilhelm L, Schlosser M. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a new vascular prosthesis coating by detection of prosthesis-specific antibodies. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008; 19 (4): 1595-600. Medline. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3316-y
26. Israeli E, Agmon-Levin N, Blank M, Shoenfeld Y. Adjuvants and autoimmunity. Lupus 2009; 18 (13): 1217-25. Medline. doi:10.1177/0961203309345724
27. Ciapetti G, Ambrosio L, Savarino L, et al. Osteoblast growth and function in porous poly epsilon -caprolactone matrices for bone repair: a preliminary study. Biomaterials 2003; 24 (21): 3815-24. Medline. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00263-1
28. Coombes AG, Meikle MC. Resorbable synthetic polymers as replacements for bone graft. Clin Mater 1994; 17 (1): 35-67. Medline. doi:10.1016/0267-6605(94)90046-9
29. Liu X, Ma PX. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32 (3): 477-86. Medline. doi:10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e
30. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res 2009; 37 (5): 1528-42. Medline.
31. Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 2009; 27: 451-83. Medline. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532