Evidence for incipient sexual isolation within drosophila ananassae

Zoological Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 577-587

  Nanda, Punita ^a   Singh, Bashisth Narayan ^a  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Drosophila ananassae; Genetic divergence; Models of asymmetry; Natural populations; Sexual

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE;

EID: 79959224854     PISSN: 10215506     EISSN: 1810522X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Barbash DA, DF Siino, AM Tarone, J Roote. 2003. A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100: 5302-5307.
2. Bock IR, MR Wheeler. 1972. The Drosophila melanogaster species group. Univ. TX Publ. 7213: 1-102.
3. Boughman JW. 2002. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 571-577.
4. Bush GL. 1969. Sympatric host race formation and specialization in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephriditae). Evolution 23: 237-251.
5. Carson HL. 1971. Speciation and founder principle. Stadler Genet. Symp. 3: 51-70.
6. Carson HL. 1975. Genetics of speciation. Am. Nat. 109: 83-92.
7. Castrezana SJ, TA Markow. 2008. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations. Behav. Genet. 38: 437-445.
8. Chang H, Y Tai. 2007. Asymmetrical reproductive isolation between Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. Zool. Stud. 46: 638-646.
9. Coyne JA, HA Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
10. Coyne JA, HA Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer and Associates.
11. Dobzhansky T. 1935. A critique of the species concept in biology. Phil. Sci. 2: 344-345.
12. Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
13. Dobzhansky T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74: 312-321.
14. Dobzhansky T, A Dreyfus. 1943. Chromosomal aberrations in Brazilian Drosophila ananassae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 29: 301-305.
15. Doi M, M Matsuda, M Tomaru, H Matsubayashi, Y Oguma. 2001. A locus for female discrimination behaviour causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6714-6719.
16. Ehrman L. 1965. Direct observations of sexual isolation between allopatric and sympatric strains of different Drosophila paulistorum races. Evolution 19: 459-464.
17. Ehrman L, PA Parsons. 1980. Sexual isolation among widely distributed populations of Drosophila immigrans. Behav. Genet. 10: 401-407.
18. Elens AA, JM Wattiaux. 1964. Direct observation of sexual isolation. Drosoph. Inf.Serv. 39: 118-119.
19. Etges WJ, CC Oliveira, E Gragg, D Ortiz-Barrientos, MAF Noor, MG Ritchie. 2007. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions. Evolution 61: 1106-1119.
20. Futch DG. 1966. A study of speciation in South Pacific populations of Drosophila ananassae. Univ. TX Publ. 6615: 79-120.
21. Futch DG. 1973. On the ethological differentiation of Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa in Samoa. Evolution 27: 299-312.
22. Gerhardt HC, F Huber. 2002. Acoustic communications in insects and anurans. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
23. Gleason JM, JM Jallon, JD Rouault, MG Ritchie. 2005. Quantitative trait loci for cuticular hydrocarbons associated with sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 171: 1789-1798.
24. Gleason JM, RA James, C Wicker-Thomas, MG Ritchie. 2009. Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females. Heredity 103: 416-424.
25. Greenberg AJ, JR Moran, JA Coyne, CI Wu. 2003. Ecological adaptation during incipient speciation revealed by precise gene replacement. Science 302: 1754-1757.
26. Haerty W, M Lesbats, P Capy. 2005. Pre-reproductive isolation as a consequence of allopatric differentiation between populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 14: 3801-3807.
27. Henderson NR, DM Lambert. 1982. No significant deviation from random mating of worldwide populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 300: 437-440.
28. Hollocher H, CT Ting, ML Wu, CI Wu. 1997. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: the genetics of the Zimbabwe race. Genetics 147: 1191-1121.
29. Kaneshiro KY. 1976. Ethological isolation and phylogeny in planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 30: 740-745.
30. Knoppien P. 1985. The number of males stored per vial: a possible source of bias in rare male experiments. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 61: 101.
31. Koepfer HR. 1991. Asymmetrical mating patterns between geographic strains of Drosophila mercatorum: a test of the Kaneshiro hypothesis. Evolution 45: 455-458.
32. Markow TA. 1981. Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 213: 1405-1407.
33. Matsuda M, CS Ng, M Doi, A Kopp, YN Tobari. 2009. Evolution in the Drosophila ananassae species subgroup. Fly 3: 157-169.
34. Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
35. Moodie GEE. 1982. Why asymmetric mating preference may not show the direction of evolution. Evolution 36: 1096-1097.
36. Muller HJ. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6: 71-125.
37. Nanda P, BN Singh. 2008. No effect of marking procedures and choice situations on the pattern of matings in Drosophila ananassae. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 91: 10-13.
38. Nanda P, BN Singh. 2011a. Effect of chromosome arrangements on mate recognition system leading to behavioral isolation in Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 139: 273-279.
39. Nanda P, BN Singh. 2011b. Origin of sexual isolation in Drosophila ananassae due to founder effects. Genetica 139: 779-787.
40. Noor MAF. 1999. Reinfocement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503-508.
41. Noor MAF, KL Grams, LA Bertucci, J Reiland. 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12084-12088.
42. Paterson HE. 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci. 74: 369-371.
43. Paterson HE. 1980. A comment on 'mate recognition systems'. Evolution 34: 330-331.
44. Paterson HE. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species: collected writings. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press.
45. Powell JR. 1978. The founder-flush speciation theory: an experimental approach. Evolution 32: 465-474.
46. Presgraves DC, L Balagopalan, SM Abmayr, HA Orr. 2003. Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
47. Ritchie MG, SDF Philips. 1998. The genetics of sexual isolation. In DJ Howard, SH Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 291-308.
48. Ryan MJ. 1998. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281: 1999-2003.
49. Sawamura K, Y Tomimura, H Sato, H Yamada, M Matsuda, Y Oguma. 2006. Establishing interspecific mosaic genome lines between Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa by means of parthenogenesis. Genet. Res. 88: 1-11.
50. Sawamura K, H Zhi, K Setoguchi, H Yamada, T Miyo, M Matsuda, Y Oguma. 2008. Genetic analysis of female mating recognition between Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa: application of interspecific mosaic genome lines. Genetica 133: 179-185.
51. Schluter D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 372-380.
52. Schug MD, JF Baines, K Amada, S Mohanty, A Das, S Grath et al. 2008. Evolution of mating isolation between populations of Drosophila ananassae. Mol. Ecol. 17: 2706-2721.
53. Servedio MR, MAF Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 339-364.
54. Servedio MR, GP Saetre. 2003. Speciation as a positive feedback loop between postzygotic and prezygotic barriers to gene flow. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 1473-1479.
55. Singh BN. 1997. Mode of mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 35: 111-119.
56. Singh BN. 2010. The origin of reproductive isolating mechanisms is an important event in the process of speciation: evidences from Drosophila. In VP Sharma, ed. Nature at work: ongoing saga of evolution. New Delhi, India: Springer Private Limited, pp. 159-173.
57. Singh BN, S Chatterjee. 1985. Symmetrical and asymmetrical sexual isolation among laboratory strains of Drosophila ananassae. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27: 405-409.
58. Singh BN, S Chatterjee. 1986. Mating ability of homo- and heterokaryotypes of Drosophila ananassae from natural populations. Heredity 57: 75-78.
59. Singh P, BN Singh. 2007. Population genetics of Drosophila ananassae: genetic differentiation among Indian natural populations at the level of inversion polymorphism. Genet. Res. 89: 191-199.
60. Singh P, BN Singh. 2008. Population genetics of Drosophila ananassae: variation in the degree of genetic divergence in populations transferred to laboratory conditions. Zool Stud. 47: 704-712.
61. Singh P, BN Singh. 2010. Population genetics of Drosophila ananassae: evidence for population sub-structuring at the level of inversion polymorphism in Indian natural populations. Int. J. Biol. 2: 19-28.
62. Sisodia S, BN Singh. 2005. Genetics of sexual behavior in Drosophila. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 43: 575-595.
63. Som A, BN Singh. 1998. No effect of marking the flies either by nail polish on scutellum or by wing clipping on mating success in Drosophila ananassae. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 81: 202-203.
64. Speith HT, JM Ringo. 1983. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. In MA Ashburner, HL Carson, JN Thompson Jr, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Vol. 3c. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-284.
65. Spiess EB. 1968. Low frequency advantage in mating of Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Am. Nat. 102: 363-379.
66. Stalker HD. 1942. Sexual isolation in the species complex Drosophila virilis. Genetics 27: 238-257.
67. Templeton AR. 1996. Experimental evidence for the genetictransilience model of speciation. Evolution 50: 909-915.
68. Ting CT, A Takahashi, CI Wu. 2001. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6709-6713.
69. Tomaru M, H Matsubayashi, Y Oguma. 1995. Heterospecific inter-pulse intervals of courtship songs elicit female rejection in Drosophila biauraria. Anim. Behav. 50: 905-914.
70. Via S. 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 381-390.
71. Vishalakshi C, BN Singh. 2006. Sexual isolation between two sibling species of Drosophila: D. ananassae and D. pallidosa. Curr. Sci. 90: 1003-1006.
72. Wassermen M, HR Koepfer. 1980. Does asymmetrical mating preference show the direction of evolution? Evolution 34: 1116-1126.
73. Watanabe TK, M Kawanishi. 1979. Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 205: 906-907.
74. Yamada H, M Matsuda, Y Oguma. 2002a. Genetics of sexual isolation based on courtship song between two sympatric species, Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa. Genetica 116: 225-237.
75. Yamada H, T Sakai, M Tomaru, M Doi, M Matsuda, Y Oguma. 2002b. Search for species specific mating signal in courtship songs of sympatric sibling species, Drosophila ananassae and D. pallidosa. Gene. Genet. Syst. 77: 97-106.
76. Yukilevich R, JR True. 2008a. Incipient sexual isolation among cosmopolitan Drosophila melanogaster populations. Evolution 62: 2112-2121.
77. Yukilevich R, JR True. 2008b. African morphology, behavior and pheromones underlie incipient sexual isolation between US and Caribbean Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62: 2807-2828.
78. Zouros E, CJ d'Entremont. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34: 421-430.