Which proximate factor determines sexual size dimorphism in tiger snakes?

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 668-680

  Bonnet, Xavier ^a   Lorioux, Sophie ^a   Pearson, David ^b   Aubret, Fabien ^c   Bradshaw, Don ^d   Delmas, Virginie ^a   Fauvel, Thomas ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION   (Australia)

^c USR 2936   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Body condition; Diet; Food intake; Growth pattern; Sexual dimorphism; Survival

Indexed keywords

BODY CONDITION; BODY SIZE; DIET; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FOOD INTAKE; GROWTH RATE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE COST; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SNAKE; SURVIVAL;

NOTECHIS SCUTATUS; SPILOTES PULLATUS PULLATUS;

EID: 79959215981     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01633.x     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Abbott I. 1980. The distribution and cover of plant species on Carnac Island, Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 63: 39-45.
2. Abouheif E, Fairbairn DJ. 1997. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch's rule. American Naturalist 149: 340-362.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey, UK: Princeton University Press, 624.
4. Anderson DR, Burnham KP. 1999. Understanding information criteria for selecting among capture-recapture or ring recover models. Bird Study 46: S14-S21.
5. Andrews RM. 1982. Patterns of growth in reptiles. In: Gans C, Pough H, eds. Biology of Reptilia 13. London: Academic Press, 273-312.
6. Arak A. 1988. Sexual dimorphism in body size: a model and a test. Evolution 42: 820-825.
7. Arnold SJ. 1994. Is there a unifying concept of sexual selection that applies to both plants and animals? American Naturalist 144: S1-S12.
8. Aubret F, Bonnet X, Maumelat S, Bradshaw D, Schwaner T. 2004a. Diet divergence, jaw size and scale counts in two neighbouring populations of tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus). Amphibia-Reptilia 25: 9-17.
9. Aubret F, Bonnet X, Maumelat S, Burghardt G, Bradshaw D. 2006. Feeding preferences in two disjunct populations of tiger snakes, Notechis scutatus. Behavioral Ecology 17: 716-725.
10. Aubret F, Bonnet X, Shine R, Maumelat S. 2003. Clutch size manipulation, hatching success and offspring phenotype in the ball python (Python regius). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78: 263-272.
11. Aubret F, Shine R, Bonnet X. 2004b. Adaptive plasticity in snakes. Nature 431: 61-262.
12. Avery RA. 1994. Growth in reptiles. Gerontology 40: 193-199.
13. Badyaev AV. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 369-378.
14. Badyaev AV. 2005. Maternal inheritance and rapid evolution of sexual size dimorphism: passive effects or active strategies? American Naturalist 166: S17-S30.
15. Badyaev AV, Whittingham LA, Hill GE. 2001. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch. III. Developmental basis. Evolution 55: 76-189.
16. Beaupre SJ. 2003. Modeling time-energy allocation in vipers: individual responses to environmental variation and implication for populations. In: Schuett GW, Höggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW, eds. Biology of the vipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, 463-482.
17. Beaupre SJ, Duvall D, O'Leile J. 1998. Ontogenetic variation in growth and sexual size dimorphism in a central Arizona population of the western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). Copeia 1998: 40-47.
18. Blanckenhorn WU, Dixon AFG, Fairbairn DJ, Foellmer MW, Gibert P, van der Linde K, Meier R, Nylin S, Pitnick S, Schoff C, Signorelli M, Teder T, Wiklund C. 2007. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? American Naturalist 169: 245-257.
19. Bonnet X. 2010. The evolution of semelparity. In: Reproductive biology and phylogeny of snakes. Reproductive biology and phylogeny series. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 645-672.
20. Bonnet X, Aubret F, Lourdais O, Ladyman ML, Bradshaw D, Maumelat S. 2005. Do 'quiet' places make animals placid? Island versus mainland Tiger snakes. Ethology 111: 573-592.
21. Bonnet X, Bradshaw D, Shine R, Pearson D. 1999. Why do snakes have eyes? The (non-) effect of blindness in island tiger snakes. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 46: 267-272.
22. Bonnet X, Lourdais O, Shine R, Naulleau G. 2002b. Reproduction in snakes (Vipera aspis): costs, currencies and complications. Ecology 83: 2124-2135.
23. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Lourdais O. 2003. The benefits of complementary techniques: using capture-recapture and physiological approaches to understand costs of reproduction in the asp viper. In: Schuett GW, Höggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW, eds. Biology of the vipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, 483-495.
24. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Mauget R. 1994. The influence of body condition on 17-β estradiol levels in relation to vitellogenesis in female Vipera aspis (Reptilia viperidae). General and Comparative Endocrinology 93: 424-437.
25. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine P. 1999c. The dangers of leaving home: dispersal and mortality in snakes. Biological Conservation 89: 39-50.
26. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine R, Lourdais O. 1999b. What is the appropriate time scale for measuring costs of reproduction in a capital breeder such as the aspic viper? Evolutionary Ecology 13: 485-497.
27. Bonnet X, Naulleau G, Shine R, Lourdais O. 2000. Reproductive versus ecological advantages to larger body size in female Vipera aspis. Oikos 89: 509-518.
28. Bonnet X, Pearson D, Ladyman ML, Lourdais O, Bradshaw D. 2002a. 'Heaven' for serpents? A mark-recapture study of tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus) on Carnac Island, Western Australia. Austral Ecology 27: 442-450.
29. Bonnet X, Shine R, Naulleau G, Thiburce C. 2001. Plastic vipers: environmental influences on the size and shape of Gaboon vipers, Bitis gabonica. Journal of Zoology 255: 341-351.
30. Bonnet X, Shine R, Naulleau G, Vacher-Vallas M. 1998a. Sexual dimorphism in snakes: different reproductive roles favour different body plans. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 265: 1-5.
31. Brischoux F, Bonnet X, Shine R. 2007. Foraging ecology of sea kraits (Laticauda spp.) in the Neo-Caledonian Lagoon. Marine Ecology Progress Series 350: 145-151.
32. Bronikowski AM. 2000. Experimental evidence for the adaptive evolution of growth rate in the garter snake Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 54: 1760-1767.
33. Brown GP, Shine R. 2002. Reproductive ecology of a tropical natricine snake, Tropidonophis mairii (Colubridae). Journal of Zoology 258: 63-72.
34. Brown GP, Weatherhead PJ. 2000. Thermal ecology and sexual size dimorphism in northern water snakes, Nerodia sipedon. Ecological Monographs 70: 311-330.
35. Buckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH. 1997. Model selection: and integral part of inference. Biometrics 53: 603-618.
36. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
37. Burton-Chellew MN, Sykes EM, Patterson S, Shuker DM, West SA. 2007. The cost of mating and the relationship between body size and fitness in males of the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 921-934.
38. Cabana G, Frewin A, Peters RH, Randall L. 1982. The effect of sexual size dimorphism on variations in reproductive effort of birds and mammals. American Naturalist 120: 17-25.
39. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH, Rudder B. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269: 797-800.
40. Cox RM, Butler MA, John-Alder HB. 2007. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in reptiles. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blackenhorn WU, Szekely T, eds. Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 38-49.
41. Cox RM, John-Alder HB. 2005. Testosterone has opposite effects on male growth in lizards (Sceloporus spp.) with opposite patterns of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 4679-4687.
42. Cox RM, John-Alder HB. 2007. Growing apart together: the development of contrasting sexual size dimorphisms in sympatric Sceloporus lizards. Herpetologica 63: 245-257.
43. Cox RM, Skelly SL, John-Alder HB. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57: 1653-1669.
44. Cox RM, Stenquist DS, Calsbeek R. 2009. Testosterone, growth, and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 1586-1598.
45. Cox RM, Zilberman V, John-Alder HB. 2006. Environmental sensitivity of sexual size dimorphism: laboratory common garden removes effects of sex and castration on lizard growth. Functional Ecology 20: 880-888.
46. Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
47. Emlen DJ, Hunt J, Simmons LW. 2005. Evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary lability, and constraint. American Naturalist 166: S42-S68.
48. Fabens AJ. 1965. Properties and fitting of the Von Bertalanffy growth curve. Growth 29: 265-289.
49. Fairbairn DJ. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659-687.
50. Fairbairn DJ. 2005. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis. American Naturalist 166: S69-S84.
51. Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenborn WU, Székely T. 2007. Sex, size and gender roles. Chippenham, Wiltshire, UK: Oxford University Press.
52. Fernandez-Montraveta C, Moya-Laran J. 2007. Sex-specific plasticity of growth and maturation size in a spider: implications for sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1689-1699.
53. Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ. 2005. Sexual selection in an orb-weaving spider. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 629-641.
54. Haenel GJ, John-Alder HB. 2002. Experimental and demographic analyses of growth rate and sexual size dimorphism in a lizard, Sceloporus undulatus. Oikos 96: 70-81.
55. Hayes JP, Shonkwiler JS. 2001. Morphometric indicators of body condition: worthwhile or wishful thinking? In: Speakman JR, ed. Body composition analysis of animals: a handbook of non-destructive methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8-38.
56. Hedrick AV, Temeles EJ. 1989. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: hypotheses and tests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 136-138.
57. Høye TT, Hammel JU, Fuchs T, Toft S. 2009. Climate change and sexual size dimorphism in an Arctic spider. Biology Letters Biol Left 5: 542-544. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0169.
58. John-Alder HB, Cox RM, Taylor EN. 2007. Proximate developmental mediators of sexual dimorphism in size: case studies from squamate reptiles. Integrative and Comparative Biology 47: 258-271.
59. Jones PC, King RB, Stanford KM, Lawson TD, Thomas M. 2009. Frequent consumption and rapid digestion of prey by the lake Erie watersnake with implications for an invasive prey species. Copeia 2009: 437-445.
60. LaBarbera M. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 97-117.
61. Le Galliard JF, Ferrière R, Clobert J. 2005. Juvenile growth and survival under dietary restriction: are males and females equal? Oikos 111: 368-376.
62. Le Galliard JF, Massot M, Landys MM, Meylan S, Clobert J. 2006. Ontogenic sources of variation in sexual size dimorphism in a viviparous lizard. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 690-704.
63. Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62: 67-118.
64. Lerner DT, Mason RT. 2001. The influence of sex steroids on the sexual size dimorphism in the red-spotted garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis concinnus. General and Comparative Endocrinology 124: 218-225.
65. Lester NP, Shuter BJ, Abrams PA. 2004. Interpreting the von Bertalanffy model of somatic growth in fishes: the cost of reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271: 1625-1631.
66. Lourdais O, Bonnet X, Shine R, Taylor E. 2003. When does a reproducing female viper 'decide' on her litter size? Journal of Zoology 259: 123-129.
67. Luiselli L, Capula M, Shine R. 1996. Reproductive output, costs of reproduction, and ecology of the smooth snake, Coronella austriaca, in the eastern Italian Alps. Oecologia 106: 100-110.
68. Madsen T, Shine R. 1993a. Phenotypic plasticity in body sizes and sexual size dimorphism in European grass snakes. Evolution 47: 321-325.
69. Madsen T, Shine R. 1993b. Costs of reproduction in a population of European adders. Oecologia 94: 488-495.
70. McDonnell RJ, Mulkeen CJ, Gormally MJ. 2005. Sexual dimorphism and the impact of temperature on the pupal and adult stages of Sepedon spinipes spinipes, a potential biological control agent of fascioliasis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115: 291-301.
71. Moore SL, Wilson K. 2002. Parasites as a viability cost of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Science 297: 2015-2018.
72. Moyes K, Coulson T, Morgan BJT, Donald A, Morris SJ, Clutton- Brock TH. 2006. Cumulative reproduction and survival costs in female red deer. Oikos 115: 241-252.
73. Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W. 2000. Bone development. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16: 191-220.
74. Olsson M, Shine R, Wapstra E. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56: 1538-1542.
75. Osmundson DB. 2006. Proximate causes of sexual size dimorphism in Colorado pikeminnow, a long-lived cyprinid. Journal of Fish Biology 68: 1563-1588.
76. Pearson D, Shine R, Williams A. 2002. Geographic variation in sexual size dimorphism within a single snake species (Morelia imbricata, Pythonidae). Oecologia 131: 418-426.
77. Penn DJ, Smith KR. 2007. Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 553-558.
78. Peters RH. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. Prenter J, Elwood RW, Montgomery WI. 1999. Sexual size dimorphism and reproductive investment by female spiders: a comparative analysis. Evolution 53: 1987-1994.
80. Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ. 1997. Sexual dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: lifetime fecundity selection on female total length and its components. Evolution 51: 467-474.
81. Reading CJ, Luiselli LM, Akani GC, Bonnet X, Amori G, Ballouard JM, Filippi E, Naulleau G, Pearson D, Rugiero L. 2010. Are snake populations in widespread decline? Biology Letters 6: 77-780.
82. Rennie MD, Purchase CF, Lester N, Collins NC, Shuter BJ, Abrams PA. 2008. Lazy males? Bioenergetic differences in energy acquisition and metabolism help to explain sexual size dimorphism in percids. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 916-926.
83. Richards FJ. 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany 10: 290-300.
84. Rutherford PL. 2004. Proximate mechanisms that contribute to female-biased sexual size dimorphism in an anguid lizard. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82: 817-822.
85. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS, Gibbs HL. 2002. Female-biased sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus): sex specific patterns of annual reproductive success and survival. Evolution 56: 2519-2529.
86. Schwaner TD, Sarre SD. 1990. Body size and sexual dimorphism in mainland and island Tiger Snakes. Journal of Herpetology 24: 320-322.
87. Shelby JA, Madewell R, Moczek AP. 2007. Juvenile hormone mediates sexual dimorphism in horned beetles. Journal of Experimental Zoology B 308B: 1-11.
88. Shine R. 1977. Reproduction in Australian elapid snakes. II. Female reproductive cycles. Australian Journal of Zoology 25: 655-666.
89. Shine R. 1978. Growth rates and sexual maturation in six species of Australian elapid snakes. Herpetologica 34: 73-79.
90. Shine R. 1987. Ecological comparisons of island and mainland populations of Australian tigersnakes (Notechis, Elapidae). Herpetologica 43: 233-240.
91. Shine R. 1988. The evolution of large body size in females: a critique of Darwin's 'fecundity advantage' model. American Naturalist 131: 124-131.
92. Shine R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. The Quarterly Review of Biology 64: 419-464.
93. Shine R. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994: 326-346.
94. Shine R. 2003. Reproductive strategies in snakes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 995-1004.
95. Shine R, Charnov EL. 1992. Patterns of survival, growth and maturation in snakes and lizards. American Naturalist 139: 1257-1269.
96. Stamps JA. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism in species with asymptotic growth after maturity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 50: 123-145.
97. Stephens PR, Wiens JJ. 2009. Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, Rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence. Evolution 63: 910-925.
98. Stillwell RC, Fox CW. 2007. Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle. Oecologia 153: 273-280.
99. Székely T, Lislevand T, Figuerola J. 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in birds. In: Fairbairn D, Blanckenhorn W, Székely T, eds. Sex, size and gender roles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-37.
100. Tamate T, Maekawa K. 2006. Latitudinal variation in sexual size dimorphism of Sea-Run Masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou. Evolution 60: 196-201.
101. Taylor EN, DeNardo DF. 2005. Sexual size dimorphism and growth plasticity in snakes: an experiment on the Western Diamond-backed Rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). Journal of Experimental Zoology 303A: 598-607.
102. Taylor EN, Malawy MA, Browning DM, Lemar SV, DeNardo DF. 2005. Effects of food supplementation on the physiological ecology of female western diamondbacked rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox). Oecologia 144: 206-213.
103. Tomovic L, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Ajtic R, Sterijovski B, Jelic D, Djordjevic S, Djurakic M, Bonnet X. 2010. Sexual size and shape dimorphism of the Vipers in the Balkans. In: Zuffi MAL, ed. Third Biology of the Vipers Conference. Calci, Italy, March 30-April 2 2010, 56.
104. Warner DA, Bonnet X, Hobson KA, Shine R. 2008. Lizards flexibility combines stored energy and recently-acquired nutrients to fuel reproduction. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 1242-1249.
105. Watkins GG. 1996. Proximate causes of sexual size dimorphism in the Iguanian lizard Microlophus occipitalis. Ecology 77: 1473-1482.
106. Weatherhead PJ, Barry FE, Brown GP, Forbes MRL. 1995. Sex ratios, mating behavior and sexual size dimorphism of the northern water snake, Nerodia sipedon. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 301-311.
107. Webb JK, Brook BW, Shine R. 2003. Does foraging mode influence life history traits? A comparative study of growth, maturation and survival of two species of sympatric snakes from south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecology 28: 601-610.
108. Webb TJ, Freckleton RP. 2007. Only half right: species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch's rule. PLoS One 2: e897.
109. White GC, Burnham KP. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: S120-S138.
110. Wikelski M, Trillmich F. 1997. Body size and sexual size dimorphism in marine iguana fluctuate as a result of opposing natural and sexual selection: an island comparison. Evolution 51: 922-936.