Salience-based progression of visual attention

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 224, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 87-99

  Michael, George A ^a   Gálvez García, Germán ^a,b  

^a Lyon University   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Extrageniculate; Nasal temporal asymmetry; Salience; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959203871     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cog Psychol 1980, 12:97-136.
2. Koch C., Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Hum Neurobiol 1985, 4:219-227.
3. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R., Franzel S.L. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1989, 15:419-433.
4. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 1991, 50:184-193.
5. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Percept Psychophys 1992, 51:599-606.
6. Michael G.A., Garcia S., Fernandez D., Sellal F., Boucart M. The ventral premotor cortex (vPM) and resistance to interference. Behav Neurosci 2006, 120:442-467.
7. Kean M., Lambert A. The influence of a salience distinction between bilateral cues on the latency of target-detection saccades. Br J Psychol 2003, 94:373-388.
8. Pins D., Bonnet C. On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron's law and choice reaction time. Percept Psychophys 1996, 58:390-400.
9. Wright R.D., Richard C.M. Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays. Percept Psychophys 2003, 65:925-938.
10. Robinson D.L., Petersen S. The pulvinar and visual salience. Trends Neurosci 1992, 15:127-132.
11. Gottlieb J.P., Kusunoki M., Goldberg M.E. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 1998, 391:481-484.
12. Reynolds J.H., Desimone R. Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4. Neuron 2003, 37:853-863.
13. Fecteau J., Munoz D.P. Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:382-390.
14. Fecteau J, Bell A., Munoz D. Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92:1728-1737.
15. Keller E.L., McPeek R.M. Neural discharge in the superior colliculus during target search paradigms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002, 956:130-142.
16. Li Z. A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 2002, 6:9-16.
17. LaBerge D. Attentional control: brief and prolonged. Psychol Res 2002, 66:220-233.
18. Rafal R., Smith J., Krantz J., Cohen A., Brennan C. Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. Science 1990, 250:118-121.
19. Cynader M., Berman N. Receptive-field organization of monkey superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 1972, 35:187-201.
20. Williams C., Azzopardi P., Cowey A. Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: implications for "blindsight" Neuroscience 1995, 65:577-586.
21. Bompas A., Sterling T., Rafal R.D., Sumner P. Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway. J Neurophysiol 2008, 100:412-421.
22. Sylvester R., Josephs O., Driver J., Rees G. Visual fMRI responses in human superior colliculus show a temporal-nasal asymmetry that is absent in lateral geniculate and visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97:1495-1502.
23. Sapir A., Rafal R., Henik A. Attending to the thalamus: inhibition of return and nasal-temporal asymmetry in the pulvinar. Neuroreport 1999, 13:693-697.
24. Itaya S.K., Van Hoesen G.W. Retinal projections to the inferior and medial pulvinar nuclei in the Old-World monkey. Brain Res 1983, 269:223-230.
25. Cowey A., Stoerig P., Bannister M. Retinal ganglion cells labelled from the pulvinar nucleus in macaque monkeys. Neuroscience 1994, 61:691-705.
26. Lee B.B. Receptive field structure in the primate retina. Vision Res 1996, 36:631-644.
27. Hendry S.H.C., Reid C.R. The koniocellular pathway in primate vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000, 23:127-153.
28. Xu X., Ichida J.M., Allison J.D., Boyd J.D., Bonds A.B., Casagrande V.A. A comparison of koniocellular, magnocellular and parvocellular receptive field properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J Physiology 2001, 531:203-218.
29. Cowey A., Stoerig P. Detection and discrimination of chromatic targets in hemianopic macaque monkeys and humans. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 14:1320-1330.
30. Michael G.A., Buron V. The human pulvinar and stimulus-driven attentional control. Behav Neurosci 2005, 119:1353-1367.
31. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perf 1984, 10:601-621.
32. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
33. Lamb M., Robertson L., Knight R. Attention and interference in the processing of hierarchical patterns: interference from patients with right and left temporal-parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 1988, 27:471-483.
34. Michael G.A. A significance test of interaction in 2×K designs with proportions. Tutorials Quant Methods Psychol 2007, 3:1-7.
35. Godefroy O., Lhullier-Lamy C., Rousseaux M. SRT lengthening: role of an alertness deficit in frontal damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:2234-2241.
36. Michael G.A., Boucart M., Degreef J.-F., Godefroy O. The thalamus interrupts top-down attentional control for permitting exploratory shiftings to sensory signals. Neuroreport 2001, 12:2041-2048.
37. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:201-215.
38. Rafal R.D., Calabresi P.A., Brennan C.W., Sciolto T.K. Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1989, 15:673-685.
39. Zackon D.H., Casson E.J., Zafar A., Stelmach L., Racette L. The temporal order judgment paradigm: subcortical attentional contribution under exogenous and endogenous cueing conditions. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:511-520.
40. Berger A., Henik A. The endogenous modulation of IOR is nasal-temporal asymmetric. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12:421-428.
41. Michael G.A., Ojéda N. Visual field asymmetries in selective attention: evidence from a modified search paradigm. Neurosci Lett 2005, 388:65-70.
42. Ratcliff R., Rouder J.N. Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol Sci 1998, 9:347-356.
43. Braun J. Visual search among items of different salience: Removal of visual attention mimics a lesion in extrastriate area V4. J Neurosci 1994, 14:554-567.
44. Cohen L., Gray F., Meyrignac C., Dehaene S., Degos J.-D. Selective deficit of visual size perception: two cases of hemimicropsia. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 1994, 57:73-78.
45. Feber S., Karnath H.-O. Size perception in hemianopia and neglect. Brain 2001, 124:527-536.
46. Miossec Y., Kolinsky R., Morais J. Illusory conjunctions and the cerebral hemispheres. Percept Psychophys 1993, 54:604-616.
47. Corballis P., Funnell M., Gazzaniga M. Hemispheric asymmetries for simple visual judgments in the split brain. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:401-410.
48. Razak K.A., Pallas S.L. Dark rearing reveals the mechanism underlying stimulus size tuning of superior colliculus neurons. Vis Neurosci 2006, 23:741-748.
49. Wallace M.T., McHaffie J.G., Stein B.E. Visual response properties and visuotopic representation in the newborn monkey superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 1997, 78:2732-2741.
50. Allman J., Miezin F., McGuinness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 1985, 8:407-430.
51. Petersen S., Robinson D., Keys W. Pulvinar nuclei of the bahaving rhesus monkey: visual responses and their modulation. J Neurophysiol 1985, 54:867-886.
52. Ruksenas O., Bulatov A., Heggelund P. Dynamics of spatial resolution of single units in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cat during brief visual stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2007, 97:1445-1456.
53. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev 1989, 96:433-458.
54. Schmolesky M.T., Wang Y., Hanes D.P., Thompson K.G., Leutgeb S., Schall J.D., et al. Signal timing across the macaque visual system. J Neurophysiol 1998, 79:3272-3278.
55. Kaas J.H., Lyon D.C. Pulvinar contributions to the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing in primates. Brain Res Rev 2007, 55:285-296.
56. Schneider K.A., Richter M.C., Kastner S. Retinotopic organization and functional subdivisions of the human lateral geniculate nucleus: a high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2004, 24:8975-8985.
57. Bender D.B. Retinotopic organization of macaque pulvinar. J Neurophysiol 1981, 46:672-693.
58. Ward R., Danziger S., Owen V., Rafal R. Deficits in spatial coding and feature binding following damage to spatiotopic maps in the human pulvinar. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:99-100.
59. Dixon P. Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perf 1986, 12:133-148.
60. Chokron S., Brickman A.M., Wei T., Buchsbaum M.S. Hemispheric asymmetry for selective attention. Cogn Brain Res 2000, 9:85-90.
61. Michael G.A., Desmedt S. The human pulvinar and attentional processing of visual distractors. Neurosci Lett 2004, 372:176-181.
62. Intriligator J., Cavanagh P. The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cogn Psychol 2001, 43:171-216.
63. Kurimoto Y., Kondo M., Ueno S., Sakai T., Machida S., Terasaki H. Asymmetry of focal macular photopic negative responses (PhNRs) in monkeys. Exp Eye Res 2010, 88:92-98.