On the Panday and Huyakorn surface-subsurface hydrology test case: Analysis of internal flow dynamics

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 2085-2093

  Gaukroger, Amy M ^a   Werner, Adrian D ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Catchment modelling; Integrated hydrology model; MODHMS; Overland flow; Surface subsurface hydrology; Test case

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT MODELLING; INTEGRATED HYDROLOGY MODELS; MODHMS; OVERLAND FLOW; SURFACE-SUBSURFACE HYDROLOGY; TEST CASE;

CATCHMENTS; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); GROUNDWATER; INTEGRATION; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; TESTING; WATER RESOURCES;

SALINITY MEASUREMENT;

CATCHMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; OVERLAND FLOW; STREAMFLOW; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 79959195991     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7959     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abdul AS. 1985. Experimental and numerical studies on the effect of capillary fringe on streamflow generation. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; 210.
2. Abdul AS, Gillham RW. 1989. Field studies of the effects of the capillary fringe on streamflow generation. Journal of Hydrology 112: 1-18.
3. Bittelli M, Tomei F, Pistocchi A, Flury M, Boll J, Brooks ES, Antolini G. 2010. Development and testing of a physically based, three-dimensional model of surface and subsurface hydrology. Advances in Water Resources 33(1): 106-122.
4. Delfs J-O, Park C-H, Kolditz O. 2009. A sensitivity analysis of Hortonian flow. Advances in Water Resources 32: 1386-1395.
5. di Giammarco P, Todini E, Lamberti P. 1996. A conservative finite element approach to overland flow: the control volume finite element formulation. Journal of Hydrology 175: 267-291.
6. Ebel BA, Loague K. 2006. Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: seeing through the fog of equifinality. Hydrological Processes 20: 2887-2900.
7. Graham N, Refsgaard A. 2001. MIKE SHE: a distributed, physically based modelling system for surface water/groundwater interactions. In Proceedings of Modflow 2001 and Other Modelling Odysseys, Golden, CO; 321-327.
8. Gunduz O, Aral MM. 2005. River networks and groundwater flow: a simultaneous solution of a coupled system. Journal of Hydrology 301(1-4): 216-234.
9. Hydrogeologic Inc. 2003. MODHMS software (Version 3.0) documentation. Volume I: groundwater flow modules, Volume II: transport modules, Volume III: surface water flow modules, Herndon, USA.
10. Kollet SJ, Maxwell RM. 2006. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Advances in Water Resources 29: 945-958.
11. Korkmaz S, Ledoux E, Onder H. 2009. Application of the coupled model to the Somme river basin. Journal of Hydrology 366(1-4): 21-34.
12. Li Q, Unger AJA, Sudicky EA, Kassenaar D, Wexler EJ, Shikaze S. 2008. Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 357(3-4): 317-336.
13. Loague K, Heppner CS, Ebel BA, VanderKwaak JE. 2010. The quixotic search for a comprehensive understanding of hydrologic response at the surface: Horton, Dunne, Dunton, and the role of concept-development simulation. Hydrological Processes 24: 2499-2505.
14. Lockington DA. 1997. Response of unconfined aquifer to sudden change in boundary head. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 123(1): 24-27.
15. Markstrom SL, Niswonger RG, Regan RS, Prudic DE, Barlow PM. 2008. GSFLOW-coupled ground-water and surface-water flow model based on the integration of the precipitation-runoff modeling system (PRMS) and the modular ground-water flow model (MODFLOW-2005). United States Geological Survey, Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Section D, Chapter 1.
16. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. In Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Modeling Techniques, Book 6, Chapter A1, Geological Survey, Federal Center: Denver, USA.
17. Panday S, Huyakorn PS. 2004. A fully-coupled spatially distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow. Advances in Water Resources 27: 361-382.
18. Sulis M, Meyerhoff SB, Paniconi C, Maxwell RM, Puttio M, Kollet SJ. 2010. A comparison of two physics-based numerical models for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions. Advances in Water Resources 33: 456-467.
19. Therrien R, McLaren RG, Sudicky EA, Panday SM. 2005. HydroGeoSphere: a three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport. Groundwater Simulations Group, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 322.
20. VanderKwaak JE. 1999. Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; 242.
21. Ward AD, Trimble SW. 2004. Environmental Hydrology, 2nd edn. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press LLC: USA; 475. pp.
22. Weill S, Mouche E, Patin J. 2008. A generalized Richards equation for surface/subsurface flow modelling. Journal of Hydrology 366: 9-20.
23. Werner AD, Gallagher MR, Weeks SW. 2006. Regional-scale, fully coupled modelling of stream-aquifer interaction in a tropical catchment. Journal of Hydrology 328: 497-510.
24. Zhang Q, Werner AD. 2009. Integrated surface-subsurface modeling of Fuxianhu Lake catchment, Southwest China. Water Resources Management 23(11): 2189-2204.