Haptic subitizing across the fingers

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1579-1585

  Plaisier, Myrthe A ^a   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fingers; Numerosity judgement; Tactile

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TOUCH;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH;

EID: 79959189180     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0124-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Akin, O., & Chase, W. (1978). Quantification of three-dimensional structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 4, 397-410.
2. Atkinson, J., Campbell, F. W., & Francis, M. R. (1976). The magic number 4 ± 0: A new look at visual numerosity judgments. Perception, 5, 327-334.
3. Burr, D. C., Turi, M., & Anobile, G. (2010). Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. Journal of Vision, 10(6, Art. 20), 1-10.
4. Kaufman, E., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
5. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1997). Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1680-1707.
6. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 111, 1-22.
7. Olivers, C. N. L., & Watson, D. G. (2008). Subitizing requires attention. Visual Cognition, 16, 439-462.
8. Overvliet, K. E., Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2007a). Haptic search with finger movements: Using more fingers does not necessarily reduce search times. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 427-434.
9. Overvliet, K. E., Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2007b). Parallel and serial search in haptics. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1059-1069.
10. Oyama, T., Kikuchi, T., & Ichihara, S. (1981). Span of attention, backward masking, and reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 106-112.
11. Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009a). One, two, three, many-Subitizing in active touch. Acta Psychologica, 131, 163-170.
12. Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009b). Salient features in three-dimensional haptic shape perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 421-430.
13. Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2010a). Grabbing subitizing with both hands: Bimanual number processing. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 507-512.
14. Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2010b). Haptic object individuation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 3, 257-265.
15. Plaisier, M. A., Bergmann Tiest, W. M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2010c). Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 525-537.
16. Plaisier, M. A., Van't Woud, M., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2011). The effect of feature saliency on haptic subitizing. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 29-34.
17. Railo, H., Koivisto, M., Revonsuo, A., & Hannula, M. M. (2008). The role of attention in subitizing. Cognition, 107, 82-104.
18. Revkin, S. K., Piazza, M., Izard, V., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19, 607-614.
19. Riggs, K. J., Ferrand, L., Lancelin, D., Fryziel, L., Dumur, G., & Simpson, A. (2006). Subitizing in tactile perception. Psychological Science, 17, 271-272.
20. Ross, J. (2003). Visual discrimination of number without counting. Perception, 32, 867-870.
21. Trick, L. M. (2008). More than superstition: Differential effects of featural heterogeneity and change on subitizing and counting. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 743-760.
22. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351.
23. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
24. Watson, D. G., Maylor, E. A., Allen, G. E. J., & Bruce, L. A. M. (2007). Early visual tagging: Effects of target-distractor similarity and old age on search, subitization, and counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33, 549-569.