Network intrusion detection based on improved proximal SVM

Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 132-140

  Gu, Chengjie ^a   Zhang, Shunyi ^a   Xue, Xiaozhen ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b Texas Tech University   (United States)

Author keywords

Intrusion detection; Kernel function; Network flow; Proximal SVM

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL TIME; DETECTION PERFORMANCE; KERNEL FUNCTION; NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS; NETWORK FLOW; NETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION; NETWORK INTRUSIONS; PROXIMAL SVM; SECURITY INFRASTRUCTURE; SVM ALGORITHM; TRAINING TIME;

INTRUSION DETECTION;

EID: 79958850284     PISSN: 19763700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4156/aiss.vol3.issue4.16     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fazal Wahab Karam, Terje Jensen, A Survey on QoS in Next Generation Networks, Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 91-102, 2010.
2. Haffner P, Sen S, Spatscheck O, Wang D. ACAS: Automated construction of application signatures. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM'05 Workshops, pp. 197-202, 2005.
3. Siwar Boujelbene, Dorra Mezghani, Noureddine Ellouze. Improving SVM by modifying kernel functions for speaker identification task. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 100-105, 2010.
4. Janakiraman S, Vasudevan V. An intelligent distributed intrusion detection system using genetic algorithm, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 70-76, 2009.
5. Prasanta G, Borah B, Bhattacharyya D. Anomaly detection analysis of intrusion data ising supervised & unsupervised approach, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 95-110, 2010.
6. Janakiraman S, Vasudevan V. ACO based distributed intrusion detection system, International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 66-72, 2009.
7. Hu W, Liao Y, Vemuri V. Robust support vector machines for anomaly detection in computer security, In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on machine learning and applications. pp. 23-24, 2003.
8. Zhang Z, Shen H. Application of online-training SVMs for real-time intrusion detection with different considerations, Computer Communications, vol. 28, no.12, pp. 1428-1442, 2005.
9. Peddabachigari S, Abraham A, Grosan C. Modeling intrusion detection system using hybrid intelligent systems. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 114-132, 2007.
10. Su Ming-Yang. Prevention of selective black hole attacks on mobile ad hoc networks through intrusion detection systems. Computer Communications, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 107-117, 2011.
11. Guinde Nitesh, Ziavras Sotirios. Efficient hardware support for pattern matching in network intrusion detection. Computers and Security, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 756-769, 2010.
12. Zhuang Zhenyun, Li Ying, Chen, Zesheng. Enhancing intrusion detection system with proximity information. International Journal of Security and Networks, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 207-219, 2010.
13. Park Nam, Sang Hyun, Lee Won. Anomaly intrusion detection by clustering transactional audit streams in a host computer. Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 12, pp. 2375-2389, 2010.
14. Soewito Benfano, Vespa Lucas, Weng Ning. Hybrid pattern matching for trusted intrusion detection. Security and Communication Networks, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33-43, 2011.
15. Zhou Chenfeng, Leckie Christopher, Karunasekera Shanika. A survey of coordinated attacks and collaborative intrusion detection. Computers and Security, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 124-140, 2010.
16. Lee W, Stolfo S, Mok K. A data mining framework for building intrusion detection models. In Proceeding of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 120-132, 1999.
17. Asaka M, Onabura T, Inoue S. A new intrusion detection method based on discriminant analysis. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 570-577, 2001.
18. Sang H, Won S. An anomaly intrusion detection method by clustering normal user behavior. Computers and Security. vol.22, no.7, pp. 596-612, 2003.
19. Jing J, Papavassiliou S. Enhancing network traffic prediction and anomaly detection via statistical network traffic separation and combination strategies. Computer Communications, vol.29, no. 10, pp. 1627-1638, 2006.
20. Mangasarian O L, Musicant D R. Lagrangian support vector machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 161-177, 2001.
21. Sahbi Hichem, Geman Donald. A hierarchy of support vector machines for pattern detection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 2087-2123, 2006.