Online domains of language use: Second language learners' experiences of virtual community and foreignness

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 92-108

  Pasfield Neofitou, Sarah ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958816222     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Belz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL, 13(2), 213-231.
3. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved from ttp://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/pdf/belz.pdf
4. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-99. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/pdf/belz.pdf
5. Belz, J. A. (2004, July). Telecollaborative language study: A personal overview of praxis and research. Paper presented at the National Foreign Language Resource Center Symposium: Distance Education, Distributed Learning, and Language Instruction. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/W44/index.htm
6. Belz, J. A. (2005). Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in Internet-mediated language learning partnerships. Language and Intercultural ommunication, 5(1), 3-39.
7. Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault ine. The Modern Language Journal, 87(i), 71-89.
8. Belz, J. A., & Reinhardt, J. (2004). Aspects of advanced foreign language proficiency: Internet-mediated German language play. International Journal of pplied Linguistics, 14(3), 324-362.
9. Blood, R. (2002). The weblog handbook: Practical advice on creating and maintaining your BLOG. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
10. Boyd, d. m. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. etrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/
12. Boyd, d. m., & Heer, J. (2006, January). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39), Kauai, HI.
13. Burkhalter, B. (1999). Reading race online: Discovering racial identity in Usenet discussions. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in yberspace (pp. 59-74). London: Routledge.
14. Clodius, J. (1997, January). Creating a community of interest: "Self" and "Other" on DragonMud Paper presented at the Combined Conference on MUDs. Retrieved from http://www.dragonmud.com/people/jen/mudshopiii.html
15. Crook, C., & Light, P. (2002). Virtual society and the cultural practice of study. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? Get real! Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 153-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making roups. Human Communication Research, 6, 119-146.
17. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 1(iii), 285-300.
18. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
19. Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2004). Negotiating cross-cultural difference in electric discussion. Multilingua, 23, 257-281.
20. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. etrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/
21. Herring, S. C. (2003). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). xford: Blackwell.
22. Hewling, A. (2005). Culture in the online class: Using message analysis to look beyond nationality-based frames of reference. Journal of Computer-ediated Communication, 11(1), Article 16.
23. Itakura, H., & Nakajima, S. (2001). IT jidai niokeru nihongo kyōiku: Honkon-Kagoshima no denshi mēru sōhōkōkei purojekuto wāku no kokoromi [Teaching Japanese education for the era of IT: Research findings from an e-mail project between Hong-Kong and Kagoshima]. Sekai no nihongo kyōiku [Current report on Japanese-Language Education Around the Globe], 6, 227-240.
24. Johnston, K., & Johal, P. (1999). The Internet as a 'virtual cultural region': Are extant cultural classification schemes appropriate? Internet Research: lectronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9(3), 178-186.
25. Kano, Y. (2004). Nisōhōkō bideo kaigi shisutemu to intānetto fōramu wo riyōshita jyūrai no kurasu wo koeta nihongo kōsu: Nihonjin daigakusei to no kōryū no yūkō riyō [Going beyond the classroom with videoconferencing and Internet discussion forum: Effective use of peer editing from Japanese college students]. Sekai no nihongo kyōiku [Current report on Japanese-language education around the globe], 7, 239-256.
26. Larson, P. (2003). Rethinking Japanese language pedagogy. ADFL Bulletin, 34(3), 18-20.
27. Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Matei, S. A. (2005). From counterculture to cyberculture: Virtual community discourse and the dilemma of modernity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/
30. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
31. Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
32. Nishimura, M. (1992). Language choice and in-group identity among Canadian Niseis. Journal of Asian acific Communication, 3(2), 97-113.
33. Nishimura, M. (1997). Japanese/English code-switching: Syntax and pragmatics. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
34. Pasfield-Neofitou, S. E. (2010). An analysis of L2 Japanese learners' social CMC with native speakers: Interaction, language use and language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
35. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
36. Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications.
37. Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2001). Social categories and sociolinguistics: Applying a realist approach. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 152, 1-19.
38. Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2004). Applied linguistics as a social science. London: Continuum.
39. Shibanai, Y. (2007). Shiron to yoron no henkan sōchi - 'Netto seron' no yukue [The transformation of personal opinion and public opinion - The future of "mainstream opinion on the net" ]. In A. Kitada & N. Ōtawa (Eds.), Kodomo to nyū media [Children and new media] (pp. 346-363). Tokyo: Tokyo Tosho Center.
40. Simon, L. D. (2002). Conclusion. In L. D. Simon, J. Corrales, & D. R. Wolfensberger (Eds.), Democracy and the Internet (pp. 96-102). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
41. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.
42. Sundén, J. (2003). Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment. New York: Peter ang.
43. Thorne, S. L. (1999). An activity theoretical analysis of foreign language electronic discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Education, Language Literacy and Culture, The University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
44. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Longman.
45. Watt, S. E., Lea, M., & Spears, R. (2002). How social is Internet communication? A reappraisal of bandwidth and anonymity effects. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 61-77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Yoshimura, Y., & Miyazoe-Wong, Y. (2005). Vācharu kyōshitsu ni okeru nihongo kōryū - denshi mēru kōkan jyugyō no susume [Japanese interaction in a virtual classroom - An invitation to the e-mail exchange class]. In R. Takahashi, Y. Miyazoe-Wong, T. Yamaguchi & M. Leung (Eds.), Nihon kenkyū to nihongo kyōiku ni okeru gurōbaru nettowāku [Global networking in Japanese studies and Japanese language education] (Vol. 2, pp. 171-181). Hong Kong: Honkon Nihongo Kyooku Kenkyuukai.
47. Zorn, I. (2004). Vifu: Virtual community building for networking among women. Gender, Technology nd Development, 8(1), 75-95.