Trabecular bone texture detected by plain radiography and variance orientation transform method is different between knees with and without cartilage defects

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1161-1167

  Wolski, Marcin ^a   Stachowiak, Gwidon W ^a   Dempsey, Alasdair R ^a   Mills, Peter M ^b   Cicuttini, Flavia M ^c   Wang, Yuanyuan ^c   Stoffel, Karl K ^a   Lloyd, David G ^a,b   Podsiadlo, Pawel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

cartilage defects; fractal analysis; osteoarthritis; plain radiography; tibiofemoral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BONE CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; CHONDROPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRABECULAR BONE; VARIANCE ORIENTATION TRANSFORM;

ADULT; CARTILAGE DISEASES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE JOINT; LEG BONES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE;

EID: 79958814742     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21396     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jones G, Ding C, Scott F, et al. 2004. Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12: 169-174. (Pubitemid 38181124)
2. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Jones G,. 2007. Tibial subchondral bone size and knee cartilage defects: relevance to knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15: 479-486. (Pubitemid 46667721)
3. Buckland-Wright C,. 2006. Which radiographic techniques should we use for research and clinical practice? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20: 39-55. (Pubitemid 43230462)
4. Brandt KD, Fife RS, Braunstein EM, et al. 1991. Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Rheum 34: 1381-1386.
5. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Jones G,. 2008. How important is MRI for detecting early osteoarthritis? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 4: 4-5.
6. Adams JG, McAlindon T, Dimasi M, et al. 1999. Contribution of meniscal extrusion and cartilage loss to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis. Clin Radiol 54: 502-506. (Pubitemid 29417685)
7. Kraus VB, Feng S, Wang S, et al. 2009. Trabecular morphometry by fractal signature analysis is a novel marker of osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum 60: 3711-3722.
8. Podsiadlo P, Lohmander LS, Dahl LL, et al. 2008. Differences in trabecular bone texture between knees with and without radiographic osteoarthritis detected by fractal methods. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16: 323-329. (Pubitemid 351309185)
9. Wolski M, Podsiadlo P, Stachowiak GW, et al. 2010. Differences in trabecular bone texture between knees with and without radiographic osteoarthritis detected by directional fractal signature method. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18: 684-690.
10. Parkinson IH, Fazzalari NL,. 2000. Methodological principles for fractal analysis of trabecular bone. J Microsc 198: 134-142. (Pubitemid 30316813)
11. Pothuaud L, Benhamou CL, Porion P, et al. 2000. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 15: 691-699. (Pubitemid 30174023)
12. Wolski M, Podsiadlo P, Stachowiak GW,. 2009. Directional fractal signature analysis of trabecular bone: evaluation of different methods to detect early osteoarthritis in knee radiographs. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 223: 211-236.
13. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, et al. 1998. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone 22: 445-454. (Pubitemid 28226857)
14. Kothari M, Keaveny TM, Lin JC, et al. 1998. Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters. Bone 22: 437-443. (Pubitemid 28226856)
15. Yasar F, Akgünlü F,. 2005. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34: 261-267. (Pubitemid 41329353)
16. Cicuttini F, Ding C, Wluka A, et al. 2005. Association of cartilage defects with loss of knee cartilage in healthy, middle-age adults: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52: 2033-2039. (Pubitemid 40994326)
17. Zhai GJ, Blizzard L, Srikanth V, et al. 2006. Correlates of knee pain in older adults: Tasmanian older adult cohort study. Arthrit Rheum-Arthr 55: 264-271.
18. Wluka AE, Ding C, Jones G, et al. 2005. The clinical correlates of articular cartilage defects in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44: 1311-1316. (Pubitemid 41487968)
19. Podsiadlo P, Wolski M, Stachowiak GW,. 2008. Automated selection of trabecular bone regions in knee radiographs. Med Phys 35: 1870-1883. (Pubitemid 351614801)
20. Cohen J,. 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
21. Messent EA, Ward RJ, Tonkin CJ, et al. 2005. Cancellous bone differences between knees with early, definite and advanced joint space loss; a comparative quantitative macroradiographic study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13: 39-47. (Pubitemid 40104262)
22. Boyd SK, Matyas JR, Wohl GR, et al. 2000. Early regional adaptation of periarticular bone mineral density after anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Appl Physiol 89: 2359-2364.
23. Ding M, Odgaard A, Hvid I,. 2003. Changes in the three-dimensional microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone in early osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 906-912. (Pubitemid 36986859)
24. Ding C, Danielsen CC, Hvid I,. 2006. Age-related three-dimensional microarchitectural adaptations of subchondral bone tissues in guinea pig primary osteoarthrosis. Calcif Tissue Int 78: 113-122. (Pubitemid 43228091)
25. Boyd SK, Müller R, Matyas JR, et al. 2000. Early morphometric and anisotropic change in periarticular cancellous bone in a model of experimental knee osteoarthritis quantified using microcomputed tomography. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15: 624-631. (Pubitemid 30497264)
26. Boyd SK, Müller R, Zernicke RF,. 2002. Mechanical and architectural bone adaptation in early stage experimental osteoarthritis. J Bone Miner Res 17: 687-694. (Pubitemid 34246644)
27. Bettica P, Cline G, Hart DJ, et al. 2002. Evidence for increased bone resorption in patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal results from the Chingford study. Arthritis Rheum 46: 3178-3184. (Pubitemid 35453526)
28. Gefen A, Portnoy S, Diamant I,. 2008. Inhomogeneity of tissue-level strain distributions in individual trabeculae: mathematical model studies of normal and osteoporosis cases. Med Eng Phys 30: 624-630. (Pubitemid 351749852)
29. Liu XS, Bevill G, Keaveny TM, et al. 2009. Micromechanical analyses of vertebral trabecular bone based on individual trabeculae segmentation of plates and rods. J Biomech 42: 249-256.
30. Lindsey CT, Narasimhan A, Adolfo JM, et al. 2004. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the interrelationship between articular cartilage and trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12: 86-96. (Pubitemid 38181116)
31. Intema F, Hazewinkel HA, Gouwens D, et al. 2010. In early OA, thinning of the subchondral plate is directly related to cartilage damage: results from a canine ACLT-meniscectomy model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18: 691-698.
32. Hayami T, Pickarski M, Zhuo Y, et al. 2006. Characterization of articular cartilage and subchondral bone changes in the rat anterior cruciate ligament transection and meniscectomized models of osteoarthritis. Bone 38: 234-243. (Pubitemid 43165790)
33. Batiste DL, Kirkley A, Laverty S, et al. 2004. Ex vivo characterization of articular cartilage and bone lesions in a rabbit ACL transection model of osteoarthritis using MRI and micro-CT. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12: 986-996. (Pubitemid 39618454)
34. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39: 175-191.