Modalities of value, exchange, solidarity: The social life of stem cells in China

New Genetics and Society

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 181-192

  Rosemann, Achim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biovalue; embryo donation; hESC research; open source biology; regenerative medicine

Indexed keywords

CHINA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DONOR; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 79958809023     PISSN: 14636778     EISSN: 14699915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2011.574371     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Brown, N., 2007. Shifting tenses: reconnecting regimes of truth hope? Configurations, 13 (3), 331-355.
2. Cooper, M., 2008. Experimental labour - offshoring clinical trials to China. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 2 (1), 73-92.
3. Dickenson, D., 2006. The lady vanishes: what's missing from the stem cell debate. Biotechnical Inquiry, 3, 43-54.
4. Franklin, S., 2007. Dolly mixtures: the remaking of genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Franklin, S. and Lock, M., 2003. Animation and cessation: the remaking of life and death. In: S. Franklin and M. Lock, eds. Remaking life and death: toward an anthropology of the biosciences. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 3-23.
6. Glasner, P., 2005. Banking on immortality? Exploring the stem cell supply chain from embryo to therapeutic application. Current Sociology, 53 (2), 355-366. (Pubitemid 40358816)
7. Harvey, O., 2009. Human embryonic stem cell research in the United States: some policy options for industry development. Politics & Policy, 37 (1), 51-71.
8. Hayden, C., 2003. When nature goes public: the making and unmaking of bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Helmreich, S., 2008. Species of biocapital. Science as Culture, 17 (4), 463-478.
10. Hogle, L.F., 2005. Enhancement technologies and the body. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 695-715.
11. Hope, J., 2008. Biobazaar: the open source revolution and biotechnology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. McCormick, J.B.,Scott,C.T., andOwen Smith, J.D., 2007.Distribution of hESClines: how,whenwhere? [online]. Available from: http://bioethics.stanford. edu/stemcells/documents/ISSCRMTA.pdf [Accessed 19 November 2007].
13. Miller, D., 2002. Material cultures: why some things matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Rosemann, A., 2009. The IVF-stem cell interface in China: ontologies, value-perceptions and donation-practices of embryonic forms of life. In: O. Doering, ed. Life sciences in translation - a Sino-European dialogue on ethical governance of the life sciences. BIONET Textbook delivery to the EU Commission, 168-178 [online]. Available from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/BIOS/research/BIONET [Accessed 10 April 2011].
15. Rubin, B., 2008. Therapeutic promise in the discourse of human embryonic stem cell research. Science as Culture, 17 (1), 13-27.
16. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. and Patra, P.K., 2008. The bioethical vacuum: national policies on human embryonic stem cell research in India and China. Journal of International Bioethics and Law, 5 (1), 221-234.
17. Stephens, N., Atkinson, P. and Glasner, P., 2008. The UK stem cell bank: Securing the past, validating the present, protecting the future. Science as Culture, 17 (1), 43-56.
18. Svendsen, M.N. and Koch, L., 2008. Unpacking the "spare embryo": facilitating stem cell research in a moral landscape. Social Studies of Science, 38 (1), 93-110.
19. Waldby, C. and Cooper, M.,2006. The biopolitics of reproduction: post Fordist biotechnology and women's clinical labor. Working Paper No.15, Global Biopolitics Research Group, King's College London [online]. Available from: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/03/03/65/wp15.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2011].
20. Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R., 2006. Tissue economies: blood, organs, and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. Warrell, D. et al., 2009. Cure Committee Report: China-UK Research Ethics. UK Medical Research Council [online]. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utillities/ Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC006303 [Accessed 20 April 2011].