Enhancement technologies and the body

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 34, Issue , 2005, Pages 695-716

  Hogle, Linda F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Medical anthropology; Technology

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 27844541289     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144020     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Allen D, Fost N. 1990. Growth hormone therapy for short stature: panacea or Pandora's box? J. Pediatr. 117(1):116-21
2. Am. Soc. Plastic Surgeons. 2004. Procedural Statistics Trends 1992-2004. http://www.plasticsurgery.org
3. Basalmo A. 1992. On the cutting edge: cosmetic surgery and the technological production of the gendered body. Camera Obscura 28:207-39
4. Behar M. 2004. Will genetics destroy sports? A new age of biotechnology promises bigger, faster, better bodies. Discover 25(7):32-40
5. Blume S. 1997. The rhetoric and counter-rhetoric of a "bionic" technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 22(1):31-56
6. Bordo S. 1998. Braveheart, babe and the contemporary body. In Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications. ed. E Patens, pp. 189-220. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
7. Bordo S. 1999. The Mak Body. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
8. Bostrom N. 2003. Human genetic enhancements: a transhumanist perspective. J. Value Inq. 37(4):493-506
9. Brock D. 1998. Enhancement of human function: some distinctions for policymakers. In Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Issues. ed. E Patens, pp 48-69. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
10. Buchanan A, Brock D, Daniels N, Wikler D. 2000. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
11. Canguilhem G. 1989. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books
12. Caplan A, Elliott C. 2004. Is it ethical to use enhancement technologies to make us better than well? PLoS Med. 1(3):172-75 http:// www.plosmedicine.org
13. Daniels N. 2000. Normal functioning and the treatment-enhancement distinction. Camb. Q. Healthc. Ethics 9(3):309-22
14. Davis K. 1995. Reshaping the Female Body: the Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. New York: Routledge
15. Davis K. 2002. 'A dubious equality': men, women and cosmetic surgery. Body Soc. 8(1):49-65
16. Davis L. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body. New York: Verso
17. Davis L. 2002. Bending Over Backwards. Disability, Dismodernism and Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York Univ. Press
18. Dumit J. 2003. Liminality, ritual and the brain image: pharmaceutical reflections. Presented at ASA Decentennial, Manchester, UK, July 14-18
19. Dutton K. 1995. The Perfectible Body. New York: Continuum
20. Elliott C. 2003. Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream. New York: Norton
21. Farah M, Wolpe P. 2004. Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hastings Cent. Rep. 34(3):35-45
22. Featherstone M. 1991. The body in consumer culture. In The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory, ed. M Featherstone, M Hepworth, B Turner, pp. 170-96. London: Sage
23. Featherstone M. 2000. Body modification: an introduction. In Body Modification, ed. M Featherstone, pp. 1-14. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
24. Foucault M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon
25. Franklin S. 2001. Culturing biology: cell lines for the second millennium. Health 5(3):335-54
26. Franklin S. 2005. Stem cells R us: emergent life forms and the global biological. In Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, ed. A Ong, S Collier, pp. 59-78. Malden, MA: Blackwell
27. Franklin S, Roberts C. 2005. Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. In press
28. Fukuyama F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
29. Gilman S. 1999. Making the Body Beautiful. A Cultural History of Aesthetic Surgery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
30. Goodman A, Heath D, Lindee S. 2003. Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two-culture Divide. Berkeley: Univ. Calif Press
31. Gray CH, ed. 1995. The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge
32. Gray CH. 2001. Cyborg warriors. In Cyborg Citizen: Politics in the Posthuman Age, ed. CH Gray, pp. 55-65. New York: Routledge
33. Hacking I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
34. Haiken E. 1997. Venus Envy: A History of Cosmetic Surgery. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
35. Haiken E. 2000. The making of the modern face: cosmetic surgery. Soc. Res. 67(1):81-97
36. Hall S. 2003. The quest for a smart pill. Sci. Am. 289(3):54-65
37. Haraway D. 1985. Manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Social. Rev. 80:65-108
38. Haraway D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium_FemaleMan©_Meets_Onco Mouse™. New York: Routledge
39. Hau M. 2003. The Cult of Health and Beauty in Germany: A Social History 1890-1930. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
40. Hayles NC. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Information. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
41. Healy M. 2004. Botox for the brain. Los Angeles Times, Dec 20:F1
42. Hoag H. 2003. Remote control: Could wiring up soldiers' brains to the fighting machines they control be the future face of warfare? Nature 423:796-97
43. Hockenberry J. 2001. The next braniacs. Wired Aug.: 94-105
44. Hogle L. 2003. Life/time warranty: rechargeable cells and extendable lives. In Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences, ed. S Franklin, M Lock, pp. 61-96. Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res.
45. Hogle L. 2004a. Body augmentations and war. Presented at the Univ. Wis., Madison, Dep. Anthropol. 6 Dec.
46. Hogle L. 2004b. Engraftment strategies: researchers and managers respond to stem cell research and policy. Paper presented to the Soc. Soc. Study Sci., Paris. Aug.
47. Juengst E, Binstock R, Mehlman M, Post S, Whitehouse P. 2003. Biogerontology, "anti-aging medicine," and the challenges of human enhancement. Hastings Cent. Rep. 33(4):21-30
48. Kalb C. 1999. Our quest to be perfect. Newsweek Aug. 9:52-60
49. Kaw E. 1993. Medicalization of racial features: Asian American women and cosmetic surgery. Med. Anthropol. Q. 71(1):74-89
50. Kevles D. 2003. From eugenics to genetic manipulation. In Companion to Science in the Twentieth Century, ed. J Krige, D Pestre, pp. 301-18. New York: Routledge
51. Kohrman M. 2003. Why am I not disabled? Making state subjects, making statistics in Post-Mao China. Med. Anthropol. Q. 17(1):5-24
52. Kotulak R. 2004. A new link to the brain. Wis. State 7. Aug. 8:14
53. Kramer P. 1993. Listening to Prozac. New York: Penguin
54. Kurzman S. 2003. Performing able-bodiedness: amputees and prosthetics in America. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Santa Cruz
55. Lakoff A. 2004. The anxieties of globalization: antidepressant sales and economic crisis in Argentina. Soc. Stud. Sci. 34(2):247-69
56. Lock M. 2000. Accounting for disease and distress: morals of the normal and abnormal. In Handbook of Social Studies of Health and Medicine, ed. G Albrecht, R Fitzpatrick, S Scrimshaw, pp. 259-76. Thousand Oaks: Sage
57. Martin E. 1992. The end of the body? Am. Ethnol. 19(1):121-40
58. Martin E. 2000. Mind-body problems. Am. Ethnol. 27(3):569-90
59. Martin E. 2005. Bipolar expeditions: an anthropology of moods. Lecture to die Holtz Cent. Sci., Technol. Soc., Univ. Wis., Madison. 2 Mar.
60. Negrin L. 2002. Cosmetic surgery and the eclipse of identity. Body Soc. 8(4):21-42
61. Ott K, Serlin D, Mihm S, eds. 2002. Artificial Parts, Practical Lives: Modern Histories of Prosthetics. New York: New York Univ. Press
62. Parens E, ed. 1998. Enhancing Human Traits. Ethical and Social Issues. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ, Press
63. Pernick M. 2000. Defining the defective: eugenics, aesthetics and mass culture in early-twentieth-century America. In The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability, ed. D Mitchell, S Snyder, pp. 89-110. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
64. Porter T. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
65. Post S, Binstock R, eds. 2004. Fountain of Youth: Cultural, Scientific and Ethical Perspectives on a Biomedical Goal. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
66. President's Counc. Bioethics. 2003. Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy
67. Proctor R. 1988. Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
68. Rabinow P. 1992. Artificiality and enlightenment: from sociobiology to biosociality. In Incorporations, ed. F Delaporte, pp. 234-51. New York: Zone
69. Rabinow P. 1996. Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
70. Rapp R, Heath D, Taussig K. 2001. Genealogical disease: where hereditary, abnormality, biomedical explanation and family responsibility meet. In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. S Franklin, S McKinnon, pp. 384-412. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
71. Rose N. 2001. The politics of life itself. Theory Cult. Soc. 18(6):1-30
72. Rose N. 2003. Neurochemical selves. Society 41(1):46-59
73. Rothman S, Rothman D. 2003. The Pursuit of Perfection: The Promise and Perils of Medical Enhancement. New York: Pantheon Books
74. Scully J, Rehmann-Sutter C. 2001. When norms normalize: the case of genetic "enhancement." Hum. Gene Ther. 12:87-95
75. Serlin D. 2002. Replaceable You: Engineering the Body in Postwar America. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
76. Shapiro M. 2002. Does technological enhancement of human traits threaten human equality and democracy? San Diego L. Rev. 39:769-842
77. Sinding C. 2004. The power of norms. In Medical History: The Stories and Their Meanings, ed. JH Warner, F Huisman, pp. 262-84. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
78. Strathern M. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge
79. Sunder Rajan K. 2003. Genomic capital: public culture and market logics of corporate biotechnology. Sci. Cult. 12(1):87-121
80. Talbot D. 2002. Super soldiers. Technol. Rev. 105(8):44-50
81. Turner B. 1996. The Body and Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2nd ed.
82. Waldby C. 2002. Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health 6(3):305-23
83. Weindling P. 1990. Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism 1870-1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
84. Zylinska J. 2002. The Cyborg Experiments: Extensions of the Body in the Media Age. New York: Continuum